Attention is drawn to the fact that right of first publication of this thesis rests with the writer. This transcript of the thesis has been supplied on status that anyone who consults it is understood to recognize that its right of first publication remainders with its writer and that no citation from this thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the anterior written consent of the writer.
This thesis may be available for audience within the University Library and may be photocopied or loaned to other libraries for the intent of audience.
Cheat AND PLAGIARISM
“ I certify that I have read and understood the subdivision in the MSc Student Handbook on Cheating and Plagiarism and that all stuff in this assignment is my ain work, except where I have indicated with appropriate mentions. ”
Name: K.A.AATHITHIYAVARSHAN
Student Number: 119340471
Signed: Date
Abstraction
Historic cognition and informations are used as a footing for future work often by Engineers. Airbus In-Service Department at Filton sets an illustration for this. Technical advice and expertness to clients around the universe in the field of flying fixs are offered. Future fixs carried out by citing past fix instances are in common pattern with the in-service section. Repair petitions from aircraft operators around the universe are dealt by In-service section. It is confronting growing in petitions and knowledge keeping jobs. Customer satisfaction and response to clients with in a really short period of clip are the cardinal ends of in-service section. To answer to their clients within a really short clip period the applied scientists are under terrible force per unit area. The clip force per unit area additions as the commercial air power industry grows. Finding suited historic instances expeditiously is vitally of import to get by up with the current scenario. The coevals of fix instructions is optimized by using old instances which act as mentions. The old instance certification is contained within Portable Document Format ( PDF ) files dwelling of fix inside informations and information rich elements such as diagrams and exposures. These elements can be used by the applied scientists to set up instances context and finally turn up a suited yesteryear instance on which to establish the fix direction. The context of this undertaking concerns the UK In-service Department of aircraft maker Airbus SAS, Filton. The service section in Filton trades with flying fix services. It investigates ways of bettering historic instance hunt techniques. This undertaking aims at back uping one of the Airbus in-service squad in developing an efficient system of techniques and procedures to pull out information rich elements. A set of historic instances are collected and analysed manually page by page. From this, a set of demands was defined that focused chiefly on better classification of instances, lineation of information rich paperss.
Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot
Contentss
ABSTRACT 3
Contentss 4
2. Introduction 9
2.1 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT 10
2.2 AIRBUS IN-SERVICE DEPARTMENT 10
2.3 Demand 11
2.4 State OF THE ART AND CURRENT RESEARCH 12
3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 14
4. LITERATURE REVIEW 15
4.1 PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT ( PDF ) 15
4.2 SAMPLE CASE 16
4.3 DOCUMENT DECOMPOSING 16
4.4 VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF DOCUMENTS 18
4.5 ROLE OF IMAGE AND GRAPHS 18
4.6 Summary: 20
5. METHODOLOGY AND DELEVERABLES 20
5.1 PHASE 1: Classification 21
5.1.1 SKETCH/GRAPHICS: 25
5.1.2 Correspondence: 28
5.1.3 Calculation: 31
5.1.4 Summary: 35
5.2 PHASE II COMMUNICATION AND REPORTS AVAILABLITY: 35
5.2.2 AVAILABLITY OF REPORTS: 36
5.2.3 DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DETAILS: 40
5.3 PHASE III INDIVIDUAL BREAKDOWN: 46
5.3.1 Detailed ANALYSIS OF CASE 11: 46
5.3.2 NATURE OF INFORMATION 49
5.3.3 Summary: 65
5.4. PHASE IV DECOMPOSITION 66
5.4.1 SUMMARY 72
6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 72
8. FUTURE WORK 75
Mentions: 76
APPENDIX 79
Figures:
FIGURE 1 CATERGORIZATION BREAKDOWN
FIGURE 2 TOTAL CASE SUMMARY GRAPH
FIGURE 3 PERCENTAGE CONTRIBUTIONS
FIGURE 4 SKETCH/GRAPHICS SUMMARY
FIGURE 5 CALCULATION SUMMARY GRAPHS
FIGURE 6: Communication Flow
FIGURE 7 REPORT SUMMARY GRAPH
FIGURE 8 CASE 11 SKETCH SUMMARY GRAPH
FIGURE 9 PROCESS OF DOCUMENT NATURE
FIGURE 10 CUSTOMER SERVICE DIRECTORATES
FIGURE 11 AERODYANMIC STATEMENTS
FIGURE 12 REPAIR DESIGN APPROVAL SHEET
FIGURE 13 STATIC STRENGTH APPROVAL SHEET
FIGURE 14 SERVICE SUMMARY SHEEET
FIGURE 15 TECHNICAL REPORTS
FIGURE 16 FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET
FIGURE 17 F & A ; DT JUSTIFICATION
Tables:
Table 1 TOTAL CASES SUMMARY
Table 2: SKETCH/GRAPHICS Summary
Table 3 Correspondence
Table 4 CALCULATION SUMMARIES
Table 5 REPORTS Summary
Table 6 DAMAGE DESRIPTION
Table 7 REPORTS Summary
Table 8 CASE 11 SKETCH SUMMARY
Abbreviation
A/C AIRCRAFT
FD FORMAL DIAGRAM
FD+A FORMAL DIAGRAM + ANNOTATIONS
RDAS REPAIR DESIGN APPROVAL SHEET
SRM SERVICE REPAIR MANUAL
SISS SERVICE ITEMISED SUMMARY SHEET
TD TECHNICAL DISPOSITION
2. Introduction
Historic cognition and usage of old plants are being the key pillars for Engineers in transporting future work. This is common in service industry and peculiarly true for airbus in-service sector. It widely believed that there is a demand for Engineers to often mention old work or studies to organize or transport out their following activities.
The activities of the In-Service Department, the lineation of the old research undertaken and the overall construction of the study tantrum in this debut.
2.1 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Knowledge direction examines how administration can efficaciously pull off, shop, retrieve and augment their rational belongingss. ( Mark Ackerman et al. , 2003 ) . Newman ( 1992 ) defined knowledge direction as the procedure that governs the creative activity, airing, and use of cognition. O’Leary ( 1998 ) defined KM as pull offing the organisation ‘s cognition by making, structuring, airing and using it to heighten organisational public presentation. Alavi and Leidner ( 1999 ) said that the Process to get, form, and pass on cognition of employees so others may be more effectual in their work as Knowledge direction. Andriessen ( 2004 ) besides gives asimilar definition for KM as the Procedure to get, form, and communicate Knowledge. So from all the definitions it ‘s all about CREATE, CAPTURE, PRESERVE, TRANSFER, DISSEMINATE, UTILIZE
2.2 AIRBUS IN-SERVICE DEPARTMENT
Technical advice and expertness on flying harm across all Airbus aircraft are provided by Airbus In-service section based at Filton. Various fix and inspection and repair installations are available throughout the universe to transport out aircraft care. To transport out their ain care Airbus supplies a Structural Repair Manual ( SRM ) to all operators of their aircraft. However, the expertness of the In-Service Department are utilised when the fixs frequently fall outside the bounds of the manual, ( McMullen 2011 ) . Advice and assistance peculiarly on complex fixs are provided and direction are besides provided for fixs which is non available in the manual and proficient questions are answered
The services provided that scope from material supply and fix to full care. This is termed as Flight Hour Services by Airbus. From airbus website it ‘s apparent that the entire worldwide aircraft in operation is 6868 and 7368 figure of bringings.From Global market prognosis 2011 predicted by Airbus a sum of 27,850 bringings are predicted. A rapid growing is witnessed ( i.e. ) a 3.5 times more bringings are expected than current twelvemonth. From this Numberss the current work load of the in-service section applied scientists and the expected to increase in close hereafter is witnessed.
2.3 Demand
The growing of air power industry, in peculiar Airbus increases the work load of the in-service squad. In general the service carried out for each and every aircraft is recorded as instances for future mention for service and redesign intents. The clip the aircraft enters for service to the clip it leave the service station all activities are recorded and stored. Each and every recording are termed as instances and stored for future mentions. The addition in figure of instances is straight relative to increase in aircrafts in operation.
It is acknowledged that the entire depository presently is approximately 90,000 Pdf files. This is about 60,000GB+ file size, runing from 100KB to 89,000 MB. The current depository is increasing quickly as the In-Service squad digitise all of their historic paper files, which is to be done before December 2012. ( E.Carey, pers. Comm. , 15th August2012 ) . This Numberss are expected to lift as the air power industry expands. The historic instances stored are extracted or retrieved by the service and fix applied scientists. The rise in figure of instances reduces the efficiency of extraction procedure. It is approximately estimated that there are around 31000 PDF files as of Sept 06 and this figure quickly increased the to 60000 PDF files as of Sept 2011. The Numberss of files has doubled in clip span of 5 old ages. The storage size in Gigabytes has been recorded as 6.3 GB in 2005 and 72.5 in 2011. The storage size has besides been increased quickly.
To react to client fix petitions in a short period of clip the in-service section is under utmost force per unit area. They work to guarantee high public presentation with following marks ( McMullen 2011 ) :
A everyday question: answer within 48 hours.
A work arrest: answer within 8 hours. This is when an aircraft is in care and a job will do it to be returned to service tardily.
Aircraft on the land: answer within 4 hours. This is when an aircraft is prevented from taking off due to a job.
From Mccullen ‘s Understanding Damage Context, the overall purpose is to run into these marks in 97 % of instances. Last the rate was 98 % . Without extra staff members and betterment in hunt efficiency these will go more hard to accomplish as the work load additions.
2.4 State OF THE ART AND CURRENT RESEARCH
Many research related to database searching and usage of in-service information in Airbus has been carried out.
James McMullen ( 2011 ) carried out his concluding twelvemonth undertaking on Understanding Aircraft harm context. His research defines the undermentioned undertakings and the development carried out for the paradigm tools:
Better categorization of harm instances, ensuing in a badness graduated table system.
Designation of location as most of import similarity metric.
Better representation of hunt consequences through ocular interface.
Improvements in future instance logging techniques by using mechanization.
Hunter ‘s concluding twelvemonth undertaking investigated informations excavation, computational extraction and administration of informations and fix instance summarization. By making fix instance summaries that extract peculiar utile pieces of information, a user can salvage clip and attempt ( Chang & A ; Hsiao, 2008 ) . A paradigm hunt tool was developed by Hunter ‘s undertaking that was based around the Vivisimo hunt engine, and which utilised the instance sum-ups. Vivisimo package was developed specifically to let concerns to optimise their information retrieval techniques ( Vivisimo, 2011 ) . To cut down user work load and to help in historic instance seeking Vivisimo tool was found.
Xie has been involved extensively with understanding and researching current patterns within the In-Service Department. It was through his work that the semantic hunt saloon was implemented into the ISQ Database. This has allowed for faster seeking through usage of equivalent word, and besides by cut downing the clip intensive procedure of column filtering in Excel. Semantic engineerings allow greater entree to informations through the usage of a model or web, where relationships are established. Vivisimo besides utilises this semantic hunt engineering.
With respect to data visual image, the tool developed by Hunter, utilised a higher degree of ocular feedback than bing systems by supplying exposures and diagrams from the PDF files in the hunt consequences. However, neither Hunter ‘s system, nor the Semantic Search saloon developed by Xie, use a basically different manner of transporting out the hunt or categorizing the historic fix instances. They both rely on applied scientists come ining cardinal information into a hunt saloon.
Searching through the usage of cardinal words is comparatively simple engineering in comparing with modern web hunt engines. These tools rely much more on context, for illustration web pages are normally ranked in hunt engines through the figure and quality of hyperlinks they have to other relevant pages ( Henzinger, 2007 ) . Other research has shown benefits to following a scope of different hunt techniques other than cardinal word seeking. Harth ( 2010 ) developed a tool that utilised keyword searching as an initial manner of specifying an initial set of consequences, and so several other hunt techniques such as object focal point ( e.g. hyperlinks ) and way traverse ( e.g. a series of hyperlinks ) to happen specific consequences. This follows the same rules described by Buckland and Gey ( 1994 ) and Shneiderman ( 1998 ) of an initial overview hunt followed by a secondary elaborate hunt to happen a coveted consequence.
3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
This overall undertaking aims at studying/analysing the historic instances page by page manually, that is stored by airbus with purpose of assisting the Airbus In-service squad in developing an efficient papers extraction technique. A set of 20 recorded instances were obtained from Airbus and is used for the analysis intent. The instances were analysed briefly and in deepness to happen out the nature and importance of the information available. This analysis consists of
Structure of the instances
The flow form of communicating
The study types involved and its construction.
Contributions from Media, computation, electronic mail and facsimile correspondence.
Page wise break down
The nature of the paperss, the manner the paperss are identified.
Graphs, pie charts and tabular columns are used to foreground the consequences obtained. The analysis was carried out with an aim that the historic instances are easy understood, the extraction procedure and job resolution techniques are self-handled by applied scientists
4. LITERATURE REVIEW
The undermentioned subdivision is a reappraisal of work that has been undertaken for this undertaking.
4.1 PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT ( PDF )
The planetary criterion for capturing and reexamining rich information is Portable Document Format ( PDF ) .A A PDF is frequently used to unite informations and information from multiple beginnings, in peculiar applied scientists frequently seek information from multiple beginnings ( Liu et al. , 2007 ) which can be collaborated normally in this format. Data excavation and informations extraction from multiple elements in a PDF is hard ( Hassan and Baumgartner, 2007 ) this is due to the deficiency of structural information in PDF paperss ( Kwok and Nguyen, 2006 ) . The unstructured text within PDF paperss is difficult to question with automatic metadata gaining control of import as manual metadata shaping tools increase employee work loads, hence implementing the importance of understanding the papers construction in order to automatically pull out metadata ( Ojokoh et al. , 2009 ) .
4.2 SAMPLE CASE
A sample historic instance collected from Airbus is analysed foremost and its content is studied. The analysis revealed the work and information type, the in-service section covering with. The analyses lead to transport out an extended survey on Visual representation & A ; its function and Document decomposition strategies.
4.3 DOCUMENT DECOMPOSING
Document Decomposition is a method to break up a papers into balls and to give each ball a label. The labels and regulations are defined in document decomposition strategies. This method should supply an penetration into the physical and semantic construction of paperss. ( Dirk Schumacher 2005 ) The intent of papers decomposition is to do the content of an electronic papers more conformable to geographic expedition and to supply a agency “ by which content ( from individual or multiple paperss ) can be reconfigured and presented to accommodate the user ‘s current information demands ” .
The aims of papers decomposition are to supply ( Dirk Schumacher 2005 ) :
aˆ? Navigation within a Document
aˆ? Exploration utilizing faceted categorization hunt
aˆ? Summaries of paperss based on their constructions
aˆ? Isolation and extraction of specific mark elements bounded by a peculiar decomposition strategy
This attack has been created peculiarly for paperss of the technology sphere. Therefore, it is non merely developed to use to text-only paperss but besides to paperss that contain graphical elements: Therefore, for the intents of decomposition the graphical elements and their significance are of equal importance to the text.
Document decomposition comprises of three strategies ( S.J.Culley, pers.comm. , 8th June2012 )
Logical Content Decomposition ( LCD ) strategies
Media Type Decomposition ( MTD ) strategies
Technical Description Decomposition ( TDD ) strategies
Different points of position of a papers are emphasized by each strategy. The character of a ball of a papers and its function within the context is focused by the LCD strategy. The MTD strategy describes merely the manner how the information is transmitted. Therefore, it is non applicable for text-only paperss. It provides an overview of the incorporating sorts of media ( e.g. drawings, text, and sound ) of a papers. The connotation of a papers is focused by TDD strategy. It is based on the descriptive character of proficient paperss. The Media Type Decomposition strategy is really utile for both applications inter- and intra-document retrieval and provides an penetration into the physical and layout construction of a papers ( Dirk Schumacher 2005 ) .
4.4 VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF DOCUMENTS
The ocular representation uses diagrams, charts to stand for informations and Knowledge The combination of artworks, image and picture in paperss are said to be ocular representation. The information is put in to chart or image or in any kind of ocular medium for easy apprehension and reading of informations. The ocular representation of the informations reduces the cognitive work needed to execute certain undertakings.
Graphs, diagram, drawings are normally used in paperss for research, understanding and reading of consequences. The effectual usage of illustrations ( images, charts, graphs, and diagrams ) in instructional stuffs is an of import aspect of instructional message design. The function of ocular representation is important in conveying information ( Paton & A ; Neilson 1999 ) .
4.5 ROLE OF IMAGE AND GRAPHS
Images and graphs are critical portion of stand foring a information in diagrammatic from. Information or information sets illustrated as images and graphs are easy to understand and construe. In service sector of aerospace industry the jobs on aircraft, in specific if wing has encountered a job means it will be easy understood by the applied scientists, if depicted in image signifier instead than text signifier.
Tables, images and diagrams are frequently built-in constituents of paperss. Each of these document constituents is characteristic of diagrammatic representations. Their reading is related to the human encephalon ‘s capacity for analogical ( or spatial ) logical thinking ( Srihari et al. , 1992 )
Tables are used in paperss as an effectual agencies of pass oning property-value information refering to several informations points ( keys ) . Diagrams, like tabular arraies, are used to convey information which is understood by worlds more readily when presented visually. This class is really diverse and includes spheres such as maps, technology drawings, flow charts, etc. The intent of diagram apprehension can be either one or both of the followers: ( I ) to transform the paper representation into a more utile mark representation ( two ) to deduce a more compact representation of the information for the intents of archival ( Srihari et al. , 1992 ) .
From a paper named Machine Graphics & A ; Vision ( Annon, 1994, pp. 77-103 ) the most common utilizations of diagrams are:
Data presentation: It means encoding of some informations in ocular format, intended to pass on it to other party. If both an conceiver and receiver are worlds, it is the traditional in writing design field. In instance of computing machine conceiver and human receiver, it is called either informations visual image, or else presentation design. Human conceiver and computing machine receiver represent the instance of diagrammatic informations input. The man-machine graphical interfaces normally combine several of the above instances.
Diagrammatic representation: It means in general encoding any informations in diagrammatic signifier, largely for storage intents, to be subsequently used as a information or cognition base, by the same or other party, be it human or computing machine.
Diagrammatic concluding involves usage of diagrammatic representations to help information processing, particularly pull outing new facts from the 1s encoded in the representation. The logical thinking may be either made merely by a human, or merely by a computing machine, or in other combinations. Useful new dimension in this instance involves separating internal usage of a diagram ( ocular imagery- homo or computing machine ) and external usage of a diagram ( diagram drawing as an assistance to reasoning-usually specific to worlds ) .
4.6 Summary:
The literature reappraisal discusses the land work carried out for the thesis. The format in which the historic instances are stored, PDF is studied. A research has been carried out on ocular representation and Documentation. With the aid of sample instance, a set of 20 historic instances ten from A320 household and 10 from A330 household is collected and a elaborate analysis has been carried out. The undermentioned subdivision methodological analysis and deliverables explains the methods followed for the analysis and the end product for the analysis is delivered.
5. METHODOLOGY AND DELEVERABLES
This subdivision provides the methods followed and stairss taken to accomplish the defined aims. Each historic instance received from Airbus is analysed manually page by page for the different types of information available. The analysed information is recorded in Excel sheet and consequences are aforethought utilizing graphs. The aim is achieved by transporting out four phase of stage work. The four stage of work carried out are
Phase I CATEGORIZATION
Phase II COMMUNICATION AND REPORTS AVAILABLITY
Phase III INDIVIDUAL BREAKDOWN
Phase IV DECOMPOSITION
5.1 PHASE 1: Classification
Classification of information is carried out to happen the type of information available in each and every instance. The available information is tagged individually and similar information is tagged under separate heading. From the overview each instance were found to possess different information viz. correspondence, diagrams, exposures, computations, tabular columns etc. Microsoft office excel is used to enter the handiness of the information and exemplify the consequences as tabular columns and graphs.
The possible dislocation done is shown in figure 1. The instances are foremost analysed to happen the figure of paperss available. It is followed by analyzing the instances for artworks, correspondence and computations. The tabular array 1 shows the figure of pages consumed by instance scopes from 5 to 552 and the identified paperss runing from 3 to 57. The papers is termed as the set of pages used for individual correspondence or single studies. It is clear that each instance has a part from correspondence and graphics/sketch. 9 out of 20 instances have part from computations
FIGURE 1: CATERGORIZATION BREAKDOWN
CASE NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
NO OF DOCUMENTS IDENTIFIED
17
33
32
7
6
13
13
23
22
11
57
32
3
13
11
11
4
7
3
3
Entire No OF PAGES
77
266
64
14
9
32
27
45
62
37
552
104
9
59
36
37
20
23
5
9
Entire NUMBER OF CORRESPONDENCE
13
48
34
6
6
19
15
22
24
12
56
32
3
14
10
11
2
4
1
1
Entire NUMBER OF SKETCH/GRAPHICS
20
281
13
2
2
11
4
9
16
10
276
39
2
28
11
15
11
8
1
5
Entire NUMBER OF PAGES WITH CALCULATION
13
16
9
4
160
11
1
11
1
Table 1: Entire CASES SUMMARY
FIGURE 2: Entire CASE SUMMARY GRAPH
The graph ( i.e. figure 2 ) stress on the consequences obtained from the entire instance sum-up tabular array 1. It is clear that the major part is from sketch/graphics. Calculation and correspondence follows study in per centum part. The per centum part of the chief three classs is depicted in the pie graph ( figure 3 ) shown below. It is clear that out of 1498 pages of entire instances 764 pages have been consumed by sketch/ artworks ( i.e ) 46 % .
FIGURE 3: Percentage Contribution
5.1.1 SKETCH/GRAPHICS:
The sketch/graphics are the media types related to the instances. It is a medium of construing information or information. A user can easy understand the information conveyed through this medium. Proof or grounds is provided to back up the information provided for the user through this medium. The study class is sub classified into
Formal Diagram
Formal Diagram + Annotation
Photograph
Photo + Annotation
Cad
SRM FD
SRM PHOTO
Trial Consequences
In general the graphics/ study illustrate or depict parts of aircraft or harm of aircraft. This even includes some trial consequences. The artworks can be a Formal diagram which is defined as the normal diagrams created by applied scientists. The same kind of diagram with notes ( i.e. ) markers or descriptions is tagged under formal diagrams and notes. Some instances depicts exposure and some including notes.
The study drawn utilizing computing machine aided design ( CAD ) package is tagged under CAD. A service fix manual ( SRM ) is provided to the aircraft operators which provided fix direction that could transport out by the operators.
CASE NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
FORMAL DIAGRAMS
1
2
3
9
5
FORMAL DIAGRAMS + ANNOTATIONS
8
21
1
2
2
1
3
13
3
26
23
2
2
1
1
2
PHOTGRAPHS
2
37
8
3
2
4
67
7
1
9
6
13
10
5
PHOTOGRAPH + ANNOTATION
4
82
1
2
6
2
2
3
8
0
1
17
3
1
1
CAD DIA
4
22
6
Trial Consequence
134
4
DIAGRAMS/ PHOTOGRAPHS FROM SRM
2
140
3
10
Entire NUMBER PAGES OF SKETCH
20
140
13
2
2
11
4
9
16
10
276
39
2
28
11
15
11
8
1
5
Entire No OF PAGES
77
266
64
14
9
32
27
45
62
37
552
104
9
59
36
37
20
23
5
9
Table 2: SKETCH/GRAPHICS Summary
FIGURE 4: SKETCH/GRAPHICS Summary
The diagrams in SRM are tagged individually. Some trial consequences end product are shown in diagrams, for illustration supersonic trial, these trial consequences are tagged individually. The tabular array 2 shows the handiness of study inside informations in each instance. It gives a elaborate sum-up of study bomber classs. The information recorded in table 2 is shown in graph figure 4. It is apparent from the graph that all instance has a part from study. Case 2 and case11 have about more than 50 % pages of part from study out of the entire figure of pages. It can be seen that there are more studies with notes and less CAD diagrams and less SRM studies.
5.1.2 Correspondence:
The correspondence is termed as a communicating medium through which every section or the applied scientists are contacted. The correspondence can be mail, facsimile, telephone etc. Each instance is manually analysed and classified. The
CASE NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
NO OF PAGES CORRESPONDENCE USING EMAIL
8
26
13
3
4
7
8
8
13
8
24
1
3
4
3
2
1
2
1
2
NO OF PAGES CORRESPONDENCE USING FAX
11
46
23
2
2
9
10
15
10
7
40
32
2
13
7
10
1
3
2
1
NO OF PAGES INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
8
26
24
4
4
10
3
15
19
9
37
21
2
9
7
6
1
3
NO OF PAGES OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
5
22
10
2
2
9
12
7
5
3
19
11
1
5
3
5
1
1
1
1
Entire Page
13
48
34
6
6
19
15
22
24
12
56
32
3
14
10
11
2
4
1
1
Entire No OF PAGES
77
266
64
14
9
32
27
45
62
37
552
104
9
59
36
37
20
23
5
9
Table 3 Correspondence
correspondence is classified into electronic mail and facsimile. It is farther divided as entrance and outgoing.
Each correspondence has aircraft inside informations and topic sing which it is posed. The table 3 provides elaborate information on the figure of pages the correspondences consume. The tabular array besides provides the information on incoming facsimile and electronic mail, surpassing facsimile and electronic mail. Percentage part of minimal 12 % to maximum 67 % is witnessed. It can besides been seen that the entrance correspondence is ever greater than the outgoing in every instance.
The entrance correspondences ( i.e. ) received by Airbus are the harm questions from client through SEER seeking fix instructions. The outgoing correspondence consists of fix instructions and applied scientists approved studies in bulk. Some outgoing correspondence belongs to clarification cell inquiring aircraft operators ( i.e ) the client to unclutter the uncertainties arrived.
5.1.3 Calculation:
Calculations are meant to be an of import grounds to back up a consequence. It is an estimation on known facts and informations. The historic instances possess computations to happen elements viz. emphasis, weariness, corrosion degree, flying place etc. The computation group is divided into three types viz.
Standard
Master
REPEATED
CASE NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Standard
7
11
9
4
121
10
4
1
REPEATED
3
Master
6
5
36
1
1
4
COMPUTER PROGRAM
3
Entire NUMBER CALCULATION
13
16
9
4
160
11
1
11
1
Table 4: Calculation Summary
Standard computations are tagged for the computations that are predefined, for illustration informations tabular arraies that possess values for certain maps. The computation or consequences that are used normally or referred are tagged under standard computations. Original computations are termed for the computations that are derived are formulated newly for work outing comparative questions. As the name defines, the computation that are repeated more than one clip in a instance is grouped under repeated computations
FIGURE 5 CALCULATION SUMMARY GRAPH
The tabular array 4 shows figure of page each group consume and the graph figure 5 interprets the informations recorded for the handiness of computation in every individual instance. It is clear that merely nine instances have part from computations. Case 11 has high Numberss of pages for computations and four instances have merely standard computations
5.1.4 Summary:
Phase I work emphasizes on the classification of information available in each instance. This classifications lead to happen kind of information available in each and their part. It can be concluded that there are major part from study followed by correspondence and computations. The figure of pages with Aircraft figure, tabular columns, signatures, and handiness of fond regards are besides done. The tabular array of full analysis for the 20 instances are shown in Appendix.
5.2 PHASE II COMMUNICATION AND REPORTS AVAILABLITY:
The stage 2 work is carried out to happen
The communicating procedure taking topographic point inside the service section ( i.e. ) who is reaching and who is being contacted.
The studies available in each instance and the information available in each study
The harm and aircraft inside informations of each and every instance
5.2.1 Communication:
The figure 6 exhibits the communicating flow that is taking topographic point in the in-service section. The clients are the aircraft operators who experience amendss and questions. The SEER acts as barrier between Aircraft operator and AUK.
FIGURE 6: Communication Flow
It organise the questions received from the aircraft operator across the universe and directs it to respective fix unit. The AUK, a Wing fix unit located at Filton, is contacted by SEER ( i.e ) SEER forwards the harm questions to AUK for fix instructions.
5.2.2 AVAILABLITY OF REPORTS:
The initial analyses carried lead to happen many comparative studies, back uping each and every instance. These studies are found to hold their ain importance. The studies available in each individual instance is has its ain importance and part. The table 5 emphasize on the studies available in each instance. Each study has its ain importance. It is understood that Daily fix petition, proficient Disposition, Repair design Approval Sheet, System In-service drumhead sheet are found to be commom in about all instance.
The day-to-day fix sheet which is besides know as Airdoc sheet is present in all instance. Airdoc comprises of
CASE NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DAILY REPAIR REQUEST
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TECHNICAL DISPOSITION
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
REPAIR DESIGN APPROVAL SHEET
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SERVICE INSERVICE SUMMARY SHEET
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
FATIGUE JUSTIFICATION
1
1
STRUCTURE REPAIR MANUAL
1
DAMAGE REPORT
1
1
1
1
1
1
STATIC JUSTIFICATION
1
1
TECHNICAL Request
1
1
1
1
Technology Disposition
1
SERIVICE BULLETIN
1
FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET
1
STATIC SHEET APPROVAL SHEET
1
1
STRENGTH SUMMARY SHEET
1
TECHNICAL ADAPTION
1
CHECK STRESS CALCUATION
1
N D T REPORT
1
1
JUSTIFICATION REPORT
1
Table 5 REPORTS Summary
Aircraft inside informations
A/C NUMBER
AIRCRAFT TYPE
AIRLINE NAME
Flight Cycles
Flight Hours
Title
Damage name
Indate
Governments signature
Techincal temperament provides the review to be embodied for the inspected harm. This study carries
Aircraft inside informations
Introduction which tells what harm has been diagonised and where it has been found.
Inspection & A ; Repair Instruction to be carried.
Refferences
Technical dispositon besides posses some media types. These studies are compliled by an applied scientists and checked for emphasis by another individual and approved by another applied scientist. In commom three signature can be found.
REPAIR DESIGN APPROVAL SHEET
RDAS is acronym for fix design blessing sheet. This sheet keep the information of aircraft and damage/repair description. Where and what informations of harm is indicated with the carried fix inside informations. Repair and justification mentions are besides provided. Authorisation and blessing inside informations of applied scientists are besides availble in this sheet.
Service ITEMISED SUMMARY SHEET
SISS is acronym for Service point drumhead sheet. Aircraft inside informations, harm and fix desriptiona and its mentions are provided. This sheet besides holds the justification information. The signature inside informations of staic and weariness applied scientists are available.
5.2.3 DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DETAILS:
The harm and aircraft inside informations associating to each instance is identified and medium through which harm evinced is investigated in item. The table 6 provided high spots the harm rubric, aircraft inside informations and the medium through which the harm is interpreted.It is clear that in most instances the harm is interpreted through a official harm study and exposure fond regards.
CASE NO
Damage Name
Damage AT
MSN
Flight CYLES
Flight Hours
Airlines
Damage ILLUSTRATED THROUGH
1
Corrosion
chief landing gear pintle pin, LH flying
326
11677
43196
Emirates Dubai
Damage study
2
Oversized holes and surrogate fasteners
outboard taking border, LH flying
696
5568
17661
Egypt air/ Cairo
Photograph
3
Corrosion
chief landing gear support rib, aft pintle frontward & A ; aft Lugs, both wings
348
10992
41061
Emirates Dubai
NDT trial study
4
Fastener designation
interior flap and wriggling, right manus flying
102
0
0
Cathay Pacific, Hong kong
Photograph
5
Question on seal coloring material difference
under flying entree panel
Gen
0
0
China airlines/ Taipei
Photograph
6
Crack aft refuel pipe fond regard hole
RHW
388
6484
46531
us air passages
CAD Diagram
7
Delamination
interior aileron tip molding, lower surface, RH flying
393
10078
34463
Cathay Pacific, Hong kong
Photograph
8
Rust harm coating
outboard interface tablet, flap path 5, LH
365
11493
43182
Emirates Dubai
Photograph
9
Crack
Centre spar angle, root articulation, rib 1 interface, both wings
333
7768
51816
US Air passages
10
Multiple impact harm due to tyre explosion
chief landing cogwheel fixed fairing, LH
132
18839
38243
Air Transat
Photograph
CASE NO
Damage Name
Damage AT
MSN
Flight CYLES
Flight Hours
Airlines
Damage ILLUSTRATED THROUGH
11
Corrosion
Bottom tegument left manus wing
331
20869
43349
Gatx renting carbon monoxide
Formal harm study
12
Corrosion
Upper surface lower rim, gear rib 5, RHW
1334
14859
31652
Taca houseman. airlines/san saiva
Photo, fd & A ; damage test study fond regard with mail
13
Damage at draging border and aileron
RHW
934
26805
26969
Tame
Photo fond regard with mail
14
Impact harm
Flying tip fencing and flying tip construction
4532
1572
3732
Tiger air passages
Company harm study
15
Crack and delamination
Movable flap path fairing, RH flying
2380
11598
16709
Easy jet
Company proficient petition fond regard
16
Damagess holes
Forward fairing assembly
1147
16
25
German wings
Damage study
17
Nut corrosion and sleeve harm
Forward pylon tap, RHW
gen
0
0
British air passages
Photo fond regard with mail
18
Gouge grade
Rib 12 stiffener between stringers 14-15, LHW
534
33158
34714
All Nippon airwaya/ Tokyo
Formal Defense Intelligence Agency and cad Defense Intelligence Agency attach. with mail
19
Minimum allowable thickness exceeded
Trunnion chafe wear, RHW
633
17823
40237
Dragon air Hongkong
Photo fond regard with mail
20
Flap trap assembly question
Both wings
1238
0
0
Sodium
Photo fond regard with mail
Table 6 DAMAGE DESRIPTION
5.3 PHASE III INDIVIDUAL BREAKDOWN:
The stage III work elucidates single interrupt down carried out for selective instances. Two single dislocations have been carried out viz.
Detailed ANALYSIS OF CASE 11
NATURE OF INFORMATION
5.3.1 Detailed ANALYSIS OF CASE 11:
A elaborate analysis for instance 11 is carried out. Case 11 is chosen for the elaborate analysis as it contains maximal figure of pages and extra studies that are n’t available in other instances.
REPORT NAME
Pages
DAMAGE REPORT
170
SERVICE REPAIR MANUAL
23
T D
2
AERODYNAMIC STATEMENT
2
R D A S
22
S I S S
1
STATIC JUSTI. REPORT
25
Compaction ANALYSIS
13
STRINGER BOLT REPORT
4
Tension ANALYSIS
9
RESERVE FACTOR SUMMARY
4
FRONT SPAR LOADING ANALYSIS
3
CHECK STRESS ANALYSIS
11
SKIN BOLTING ANALYSIS
1
STATIC STRENGTH APPR. Sheet
3
FATIGUE APPR. Sheet
15
F & A ; DT JUSTIFICATION
130
REMAINING
50
Entire NO OF PAGES
552
Table 7 REPORTS Summary
FIGURE 7 REPORT SUMMARY GRAPH
FORMAL DIAGRAMS
9
FORMAL DIAGRAMS + ANNOTATIONS
26
PHOTGRAPHS
67
PHOTOGRAPH + ANNOTATION
8
CAD DIA
22
Trial Consequence
134
DIAGRAMS/ PHOTOGRAPHS FROM SRM
10
Entire NUMBER OF SKETCH
276
Table 8 CASE 11 SKETCH SUMMARY
FIGURE 8 CASE 11 SKETCH SUMMARY GRAPH
The tabular array 7 and its several graph, figure 8 shows the studies inside informations and its entire page part. It is apparent that harm study and F & A ; DT justification study have more figure of pages. Table 8 and its several graph, figure 9 gives the inside informations of study and part of its classs. It is seen that 49 % of the study is consumed by trial consequences. Here the trial consequences are the consequences of an experimental apparatus that are carried out and illustrated utilizing artworks.
5.3.2 NATURE OF INFORMATION
The nature of information that is available in 10 selective instances are studied and analysed.
CASE 11:
DOCUMENT NO
UNDERSTANDING/ RESOLVING/ SOLVING
Reason
Date
1
Understanding
It ‘s an airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing.
In: 18.01.2010
Target:
19.01.2010
2
Understanding
Contains mail forwarded from SER to AUK fix unit from Lufthansa Airlines. It has a harm study fond regard holding harm inside informations and fix proposal.
12.02.2010
40 exposures
2 CAD
46 Test consequences Defense Intelligence Agency.
3
Clarification
Reply from AUK inquiring for elucidation sing grid readings, whether old location studies are for mention
17.02.2010
4
Understanding
Reply from SEER with clarified study fond regard sent from Lufthansa air passages.
03.03.2010
11 exposures
2 CAD
18 trial consequences
5
Understanding
Reply mail from AUK to SEER saying high volume of work burden and giving advice on work to be carried at this phase. Rectification from operator is asked.
05.03.2010
6
Solving
Mail to AUK from SEER inquiring for complete concluding fix direction with provided inside informations.
12.03.2010
1 exposure
2 CAD
4 trial consequences
7
Solving
Repair instructions and advice from AUK to SEER
17.03.2010
8
Solving
From AUK to SEER remarks on damaged countries
19.03.2010
9
Deciding
From Lufthansa to SEER, feedbacks
01.04.2010
CAD 2
Test consequences 3
10
Solving
From SEER to Lufthansa proficient temperament ( fix processs )
26.03.2010
1 FD+A, 1 Cad
11
Deciding
Lufthansa waiting for concluding fix direction, from SEER to AUK, fond regard of Structural fix manual
12.04.2010
12
Solving
Remarks provided for damaged countries by AUK to SEER
12.04.2010
13
work outing
From AUK to SEER, attached fix instructions
AUK TO SEER, instructions to operator
AUK TO SEER, instructions to operator
14.04.2010
30.06.2010
04.07.2010
SRM FD 10
14
deciding
Lufthansa studies to be reviewed and repair instructions to be provided
20.07.2010
15
1 trial consequences
16
Decide
From SEER to AUK, to reexamine Lufthansa study and supply instructions
21.07.2010
17
Understanding
From SEER to AUK
22.07.2010
18
Decide
Visionary to AUK, reappraisal LTM study and to supply instructions
10.08.2010
1 trial consequence
19
understanding
AUK to SEER
11.08.2010
20
elucidation
SEER to AUK, reappraisal LTM study and to supply instructions
18.08.2010
1 trial consequence
21
Understanding
SEER to AUK, reappraisal LTM study and to supply instructions
27.08.2010
22
Understanding
AUK to SEER
20.08.2010
23
Understanding
AUK to SEER
31.08.2010
24
Understanding
AUK to SEER
31.08.2010
25
understanding
AUK to SEER
02.09.2010
26
Deciding
SEER to AUK, requested to reexamine and supply preliminary remarks
10.09.2010
2 trial consequences
27
Understanding
Advice to operator, from AUK to SEER
13.09.2010
28
Deciding
From SEER to AUK, bespeaking, fix design, emphasis, RAS issue ( relevant paperss )
03.1.2011
29
Understanding
From AUK to SEER, bespeaking to alter RAS deadline
11.01.2011
30
Deciding
SEER to AUK, reappraisal of LMT feedback and issue of RAS, fastener installing inside informations
03.02.2011
31
understanding
AUK to SEER, operator has deviated from instructions and has requested for verification
18.02.2011
32
Understanding
Reply to deviation verification
24.02.2011
33
Solving
Aeromechanicss statement attached, from SEER AUK
04.03.2011
2 FD
34
Understanding
Reticular activating system
35
Understanding
Sister
36
Solving
Inactive justification study, contains original computation ( ref )
25.02.2011
3 FD+A
37
Understanding
Compaction analysis trial ( ref )
Sept 97
38
Understanding
Analysis of stringers ( ref )
Oct 97
39
Understanding
Tension analysis ( ref )
Oct 97
2 FD+A
40
Understanding
Reserve factor sum-up ( ref )
Feb 98
41
Understanding
Front spar lading analysis ( ref )
Mar 98
42
Understanding
Check emphasis analysis ( ref )
Oct 97
5 FD+A
43
Understanding
Skin bolting analysis ( ref )
Dec 97
44
Understanding
Reserve factor sum-up ( ref )
Jan 98
45
Understanding
RDTAS
46
Understanding
STATIC STRENGTH APPROVAL SHEET
47
Solving
FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET
48
Solving
F & A ; DT JUSTIFICATION, DAMAGE AND REPAIR DESCRIPTION WITH TEST RESULTS
1.08.2011
11 FD+A
5 FD
15 Photograph
8 PHOTO+ Angstrom
52 Trial Consequence
49
Decide
Visionary TO CUSTOMER
16.09.2011
50
understanding
SEER TO AUK
16.09.2011
51
understanding
RDTAS
52
work outing
FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET
53
work outing
SEER TO AUK
27.09.2011
54
work outing
SEER TO AUK
12.10.2011
55
understanding
RDTAS
56
understanding
STATIC STRENGTH APPROVAL SHEET
57
understanding
FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET
CASE 12
Document no
Nature
Reasons
Date
1
Understanding
It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing.
26.10.2010
2
understanding
From SEER to AUK, bespeaking for preliminary remarks
26.10.2010
1 FD
2 FD+A
1 Photograph
1 Trial Consequence
3
Resoluteness
Response from AUK to SEER bespeaking for full damaged study as informations sent is deficient, saying probes had started with informations provided
26.10.2010
4
Solving
From SEER to AUK, supplying function required and inquiring for reappraisal and fix recommendations
26.10.2010
2 fd+a
2 exposure
2 trial consequences
5
Deciding
From AUK to SEER, saying, grid analysis sent is deficient for analysis, inquiring specification for fastners removed
27.10.2010
6
Deciding
From AUK to SEER, saying airbus noticed some disagreements in the clients damaged study and inquiring for accounts.
27.10.2010
7
Deciding
Feedback information from client to airbus
27.10.2010
1 fd
2 fd+a
2 exposure
1 trial consequences
8
Solving
Asking for reappraisal and fix recommendations, from SEER to AUK
28.10.2010
9
Understanding
From AUK to SEER
28.10.2010
10
Solving
From client to airbus, inquiring for fix instructions
29.10.2010
11
understanding
From visionary to AUK
29.10.2010
12
Deciding
From client to airbus
30.10.2010
13
deciding
From Airtac to client, TD is attached
30.10.2010
14
deciding
From AUK to SEET
29.10.2010
15
solve
From client to Airbus
1.11.2010
16
resoluteness
From SEER TO AUK
02.11.2010
17
understanding
From AUK to SEER
02.11.2010
18
resoluteness
From SEER TO AUK
06.11.2010
19
Decide
From client to airbus
06.11.2010
1 exposure
20
Solve
From AUK to SEER
07.11.2010
21
Resoluteness
From SEER TO AUK
07.11.2010
22
Resoluteness
From AUK to SEER
08.11.2010
23
SOLVE
From client to airbus
08.11.2010
24
SOLVE
FROM SEER TO AUK
09.11.2010
25
Resoluteness
FROM SEER TO AUK
10.11.2010
26
Resoluteness
FROM AUK TO SEER
10.11.2010
27
Understanding
FROM CUSTOMER TO AIRBUS
14.11.10
28
SOLVE
FROM SEER TO AUK
14.11.2010
29
Understanding
RDAS
15.11.2010
30
Understanding
Sister
15.11.2010
31
UNIDENTIFIED
UNIDENTIFIED
UIDENTIFIED
32
Understanding
WORKS AND CALCULATION CARRIED
15.11.2010
33
Understanding
FSTIGUE JUSTIFICATION REPORT WHICH HAS SUMMARY OF DAMAGE AND REPAIR INSTURCTIONS
16.11.2010
CASE 13
DOCUMENT NO
Nature
Reason
Date
1
Understanding
It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing
06.02.2012 IN & A ; TARGET
2
Resoluteness
SEER TO AUK, CONTAINS A SERVICE REPAIR MANUAL
06.02.2012
2 Photograph
3
Resolution
FROM AUK TO SEER
06.02.2012
CASE 14
DOCUMENT NO.
Date
Nature
Reason
1
In and aim day of the month 14.12.2011
understanding
It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing
2
14.12.2011
Solving
From SEER TO AUK, CONTAINS A DAMAGE REPORT
3 Photograph
3
14.12.2011
Solving
FROM SEER TO AUK, CONTAINS A AMAGE REPORT, MORE DAMAGE FOUND
4 exposure + A
4
14.12.2011
Understanding
From SEER TO AUK
5
14.12.2011
Resoluteness
FROM SEER TO AUK ASKING FOR CHECK REPORT AND ASSESS REWORK PERFORMED
6
14.12.2011
SOLVE
FROM SEER TO AUK, PRELIMINARY INSPECTION PROGRAM IS GIVEN, INCLUDES DAMAGE REPORT
1 Photograph
4 PHOTO + A
7
14.12.2011
Resolution
FROM AUK TO SEER, ADVICE TO OPERATOR IS PROVIDED AND TD IS ATTACHED
4 Photograph
8
14.12.2011
Understanding
DAMAGE REPORT IS ENCLOSED, WITH INSPECTION RESULTS FROM SEER TO AUK
9
14.12.2011
Resolution
FOUND A CRAK AND SIAEC PROVIDED NEW REPORT, REQUEST FOR REPAIR INSTRUCTIONS, ATTACHED DAMAGED REPORT
1 Photograph
1 PHOTO +A
10
14.12.2011
Resolution
FROM AUK TO SEER WITH TD ATTACHED, PROVIDEING INSPECTION TO BE EMBODIED.
11
15.12.2011
Deciding
From SEER TO AUK, REQUESTINF ADVICE, DAMAGE REPORT IS ATTACHED
12
15.12.2011
Resolution
FROM AUK TO SEET, WITH TD ATTACHED PROVIDING INSPECTION INSTRUCTIONS
4 PHOTO + A
1 FD+A
13
15.12.2011
Understanding
FROM AUK TO SEER
CASE 15
DOUMENT NO
Nature
Reason
Date
1
Understanding
It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing
IN 24.04.2010
Target 29.04.2010
2
SOLVE
From visionary to auk, bespeaking for reappraisal and fix remarks, proficient petition and technology temperaments are attached.
28.04.2010
1 P + A
1 Phosphorus
3
Resoluteness
from auk to seer, bespeaking operator to execute removal instructions and ndt review and to supply with studies of the findings
29.04.2010
4
Resolution
from visionary to auk, technology temperament is attached, reappraisal and fix instructionare requested
03.05.2010
2 P+A
1 Phosphorus
5
Understanding
from AUK TO SEER, thanking for feedback and information that they are transporting on with analysis field-grade officer harm
04.05.2010
6
Understanding
FROM SEER TO AUK
04.05.2010
7
SOLVE
FROM AUK TO SEER, answer to last message dated 04.05.2010, inquiring to transport out fix in conformity with fix direction, and operator is requested to describe back.
05.05.2010
8
Decide
From SEER TO AUK, petition for RAS
07.05.2010
9
Understanding
Reticular activating system
10.05.2010
10
Understanding
Sister
10.05.2010
11
UNDERSTANGING
STATIC JUSTIFICATION. THE REPORTER DAMAGE HAS BEEN RESPONDED
10.05.2010
FD+A 2
PHOTO 4
CASE 16:
Document no
Nature
Reason
Date
1
Understanding
It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing
In: 30.06.2010
Target: 06.07.2010
2
Solving
From SEER TO AUK, contains damage study
30.06.2010
4 Photograph
3
Resoluteness
FROM AUK TO SEER
06.07.2010
4
Understanding
FROM SEER TO AUK
08.07.2010
5
Resoluteness
FROM SEER TO AUK
06.07.2010
6
Understanding
FROM TO AUK TO SEER
09.07.2010
7
SOLVE
FROM SEER TO AUK, bespeaking reappraisal and TD and contains damage study
12.07.2010
4 Photograph
8
Resoluteness
FROM AUK TO SEER,
14.07.2010
9
SOLVE
FROM SEER TO AUK, bespeaking reappraisal and has damage study fond regard
30.09.2010
5 Photograph
1 PHOTO+A
10
Resoluteness
FROM SEER TO AUK
15.07.2010
11
Understanding
contains a TD with fix process
06.07.2010
TD. APPROVAL:04.10.2010
CASE 17
DOCUMENT NO
Nature
Reason
Date
1
Understanding
It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing
Inch: 19.10.2011
Target: 24.10.2011
2
Resolution
TO AUK
18.10.2011
2 Photograph
1 FD+A
3
Resolution
TO AUK
24.10.2011
8 Photograph
4
Resoluteness
FROM AUK TO SEER
25.10.2011
CASE 18
DOCUMENT NO
Nature
Reason
Date
1
Understanding
It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing
Inch: 13.06.2011
Target: 15.06.2011
2
Resolution
DAMAGE REPORT IS ATTACHED, REQUESTING AUK TO REVIEW REPORT AND PROVIDE COMMENTS
13.06.2011
1 FD+A
2 CAD DIA
3
Resolution
FROM AUK TO SEER WITH TD PROVIDING REPAIR PROCEDURE
14.06.2011
4
Resoluteness
SEER TO AUK REQUESTING TO REVIEW THE REPAIR FEEDBACK AND TO PROVIDE RELEVANT DOCUMENTS
22.06.2011
5
Understanding
RDTAS
27.06.2011
6
Understanding
STATIC STRENGTH APRROVAL SHEET
27.06.2011
7
Understanding
FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET
27.06.2011
CASE 19
DOCUMENT NO
Nature
Reason
Date
1
Understanding
It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing
INDATE: 19.09.2011
TARGETDATE: 20.09.2011
2
Resolution
FROM SEER TO AUK, REQUESTING REVIEW OF DAMAE REPORT AND COMMENTS
19.09.2011
1 Photograph
3
Understanding
FROM AUK TO SEER
20.09.2011
CASE 20:
DOCUMENT NO
Nature
Reason
Date
1
Understanding
It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing
IN DATE:28.10.2011
