In the past 20 old ages gun control has become one of the most controversial subjects in the United States. With public shots going more popular, citizens are now forcing for stricter gun ordinances harder than of all time. Many citizens are opposing these ordinances feeling that this would be menace to their rights as an American citizen. I believe that certain ordinances against certain guns and people are all right and apprehensible, but stricter Torahs than what we already have are nowhere near necessary. With the American citizens in difference the Government is seeking to come to a via media on these proposed Torahs.

Gun ordinances are really wide and non impossible to acquire around. Fully automatic arms are now about impossible to acquire and you can merely make so with highly deep background cheques and a certain license. This I can understand, why would the mean citizen demand to hold a machine gun? Though I do non believe limitations on arms used for runing, athletics shot and ego protection demand to be strengthened. There is genuinely no demand for this you are making more injury than good. By beef uping ordinances on guns you are penalizing many who have done nil incorrect. “ There are 45 million Americans that consider themselves huntsmans ” stated in [ beginning 6 ] , by beef uping these Torahs you would already be penalizing all of them for events they could and can non command. I do non believe huntsmans should hold to perchance confront these possible Torahs placed against them when all they are making is utilizing guns for athletics. Why should this group of 45 million Americans have to travel through this to merely make what they love? Hunters, such as myself should non hold to confront these limitations as if we were felons and making something incorrect.

Puting Torahs on certain arms such as bolt action rifles will make much more harm than good. Restrictions on arms are aching the jurisprudence staying citizens because they are the 1s who will really follow the Torahs placed upon them. Criminals will be the citizens that benefit from this, and even if a slayer does non hold a gun those who want to kill will kill, whether it is with a knife, gun, or even their custodies. A liquidator will non obey the Torahs nor will drug traders, stealers or even your common “ mobster ” . Your common citizen will be left defenseless while all of your felons are left armed. By holding no guns you are practically a sitting duck for all kinds of felons, would you like that?

In 2008 there were 5,340,000 violent offenses committed in the United States, merely 8 % were committed with person transporting a gun stated in [ beginning 5 ] . This disproves the idea of everyone believing less guns means less offense. Criminals do non ever have guns with them so this will non cut down the offense rate if anything it will lift from tighter limitations on guns. I believe that after many of the school shots people believe that gun limitations will wholly bring around this. These liquidators had a undertaking and they merely take to make it with a gun because it was the simplest thing they could utilize. If limitations were tighter on guns and they could non pull off to happen guns I believe that these liquidators would of establish another manner to kill at these schools. They could merely as easy do a bomb and do an detonation that would do merely every bit much harm if non more. Gun Torahs will non curtail people from killing each other, it ne’er has.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Mexico is one of the hardest states to obtain a gun in yet it has an highly high offense rate. Though guns are non easy to purchase the felons or drug trusts have no job acquiring their custodies on them. Latin America has strict regulations on guns and are now confronting high force in many of their states “ When guns are outlawed, merely outlaws have guns ” , because felons know that the civilians are largely defenseless they have no jobs acquiring their offenses done. If there were no ordinances on guns or even less rigorous ordinances offense rates would take down because more citizens would be armed and could support themselves. In the 1970 ‘s Jamaica tightened their gun Torahs and witnessed a rise in offense. Drug trusts began to catch the state and slaying rates rose in all major metropoliss such as Kingston. It has been proven multiple times that beef uping our gun Torahs will make nil for the better of our state. [ Source 7 ]

In The United States, the Second Amendment gives all citizens the “ Right to bear weaponries ” . This means that U.S. citizens have the right to have a piece, with the right makings. American citizens obtained this right for two chief grounds. One ground being the ability to protect themselves from foreign states that could perchance assail. With this citizen ‘s owning guns would do organizing a reserves much easier. The 2nd ground is to protect themselves from our ain authorities. This is because if another revolution was necessary so the authorities would non hold the upper manus by holding defenseless citizens. The citizens would be armed and ready to revolt if they had to alternatively of being left unarmed if they were to revolt. The Second amendment is frequently used as a counter statement to any individual seeking to reason for stricter gun Torahs. Which I believe is really good stuff our initiation father wrote this in to the fundamental law for a ground. I believe this was done for the populace ‘s ain good and citizens have every right to support there place in this state of affairs. This Amendment is making more good than injury by far ; it leaves most American citizens with the right to hold a piece, hence giving them a beginning of protection. This Amendment is now going one of the most controversial rights in America.

There are three chief types of pieces, those being a rifle, scattergun and a pistol. They are all used for different state of affairss and some types of guns are harder to obtain than others. Different specifications on all three types of these guns are now under force per unit area from perchance new gun limitations.

A rifle is a gun that has spirally channels running through the barrel, and is normally used for long scope shot, but non ever. Rifles are the most normally used gun for runing. They can be used in close and long scope state of affairss while runing. Rifles are frequently used by snipers in the military therefore picking up the name “ sniper rifle ” . Most rifles are what you would name “ bolt actions ” . This action is really simple and sufficient, to steer this you merely raise up on the bolt, draw back and so force frontward and this should set a unit of ammunition into the chamber of the gun. Bolt actions can non be fired quickly because you must work the bolt each clip before firing. This is why rifles are normally used for runing because when runing why would you necessitate a machine gun? Rifles are a popular hunting arm throughout America and now huntsmans are confronting jobs with new proposed gun Torahs.

Shotguns are guns that fire little pellets or BBs at a short scope. There are multiple types of scatterguns those being a individual shooting, semi automatic, pump actions and dual barrels. Double barrels can be either a side by side or an over and under. A side by side shooting gun has two barrels that are place next to each other. An over and under has two barrels one placed right above the other. Though these guns have two barrels they can merely hit one unit of ammunition at a clip. A individual shooting means that the gun can merely keep and fire one unit of ammunition at a clip. Semi machine rifles chamber rounds themselves and all you must make to fire is pull the trigger. A pump action is manually re-chambered each clip you “ pump ” the gun. When pumped the gun grabs a shell from the magazine and loads it into the chamber and so fires when the trigger is pulled. Shotguns are frequently used for short scope state of affairss. They besides along with rifles are used largely for hunting, but besides self protection. Shotguns have many different types or besides called gages. Some are a 10, 12, 16 20 and 28. The lower the figure gauge the more pellets packed into the shell. Shotgun pellets range in size depending on the game being hunted. Shotguns have characteristics called stoppers which limit the sums of unit of ammunitions you can maintain in your magazine. In Arizona you must hold a stopper in a scattergun restricting the sum of unit of ammunitions in your gun to three [ Source 8 ] . Shotguns are one of the most popular hunting arms and besides used for personal defence. So why punish those utilizing them for the right grounds and making nil illegal because a little per centum of citizens are perpetrating offenses with pieces?

Pistols are little hand-held pieces and are largely used for ego defence, but can be used for some types of hunting. Handguns are the most popular pick for felons and this is for many grounds. Pistols can be easy concealed and disposed of after perpetrating a offense because of their size. Besides felons like them because they are light and can be rapidly drawn for het state of affairss. It is estimated that there are around 52,000,000 pistols in circulation today [ Source 2 ] . Strengthening gun Torahs on any type of gun even handguns is incorrect, merely because many felons do posses a pistol does non intend all pistols are used for immorality. Handguns face heavy persecution, but I believe taking pistols off would take away many civilians manner of protection off. Therefore rigorous Torahs will on pistols or any tpe of gun will go forth civilians defenseless.

Semi automatic arms are now wanted by many to go illegal or hold really rigorous Torahs placed upon them. A Sheriff in Minnesota stated “ What if terrorist ‘s arm of pick was a shotgun-would people support taking away runing scatterguns? “ [ Source 9 ] . I believe this is a great illustration of how Americans are handling the state of affairs of gun control. Many semi automatic arms ( a terrorist ‘s arm pick ) , are being proposed to go banned in America. This is merely because of the media ‘s position on semi machine rifles are a negative position hence giving the general populace a negative feeling for any semi automatic arm. The general populace is non given the side about how the semi machine rifles are used for recreational intents and runing. But is any one gun more unsafe than the other? A Minnesota Sheriff stated that he believed a scattergun was merely every bit unsafe as an AR 15 ( a semi automatic rifle ) . This is every spot of true so why would the authorities effort to put more Torahs on certain types of guns when in truth no 1 gun is more unsafe than the other. All guns fire potentially fatal unit of ammunitions, merely at different velocities and sums. So what would censoring one type of gun do for take downing decease and offense rates? If certain pieces are banned felons will merely travel to a different type of gun or maintain the arm they have, therefore what job does this work out? By censoring guns you are non work outing a job, you are making one. You are penalizing the jurisprudence staying citizen [ Source 9 ] , and besides seting them in a more unsafe atmosphere. A prohibition on guns will make nil but raise a metropolis and state ‘s offense rates.

In Kennesaw, Georgia a jurisprudence was passed in 1982 that required each family caput to have a gun. The jurisprudence has been effectual and Kennesaw has kept a low offense rate since the jurisprudence was passed [ Source 10 ] . This jurisprudence proves that having guns for ego defence has merely positive facets. Alternatively of implementing stricter gun Torahs on citizens in America, why do they non follow what happened in Kennesaw. This would go forth common citizens armed and protected from any possible felons. Alternatively of taking guns off from those who do obey the jurisprudence and go forthing lone felons with guns. Now what do you believe makes more sense? In my sentiment I would much instead be armed and protected than have to contend a cat with a gun off with my custodies.

Many believe guns are the major cause of decease in the United States when in all truth this is non what is go oning. Though there are many gun related deceases it is merely a fraction of other causes of decease.

hypertext transfer protocol: // [ Source 11 ] As you can see in the chart above piece homicides merely do up about 1/50th of the sum of deceases that tobacco causes. So if we are traveling to censor pieces should we censor baccy excessively? By censoring baccy you would salvage about 490,000 more lives than by censoring every individual piece. Besides more people die by medical mistakes than by firearm homicides. Should we maintain physicians from practising their occupation because of all those deceases? That would look a bit pathetic to me candidly, but so does censoring pieces. If pieces were banned I believe that decease rate would remain the same if non lift. More people on mean dice from incidental falls than firearm homicides. How can we forestall this from go oning should we censor citizens from walking? Besides on mean 25,500 people a twelvemonth dice from drug maltreatment. Drugs are illegal in every province besides the exclusion of marihuana, yet more people are deceasing from drugs which are illegal than being changeable. So what if guns were made illegal? Obviously doing something illegal does non halt people from obtaining it and utilizing it, but those who do obey the jurisprudence are left to cover with the felons who in this state of affairs would hold the upper manus. It is proven by this graph there are many other causes for decease much higher decease toll Numberss than piece homicides. Most of the grounds being something that will ne’er hold stricter Torahs placed upon it because it is impractical merely like puting tighter gun limitations on the common gun proprietor ; it does nil but cause injury.

It has been successfully proven that states with rigorous Torahs on guns still have higher slaying rates. In Russia pistols are wholly outlawed. You can merely buy rifles and you must acquire a license for that. You can merely hold a rifle for ego protection in Russia. You would conceive of that that would assist lower slaying rates in a state. Yet Russia ‘s slaying rate sits at a reeling 30.6 [ Source 12 ] . This disproves the theory of fastening gun Torahs would assist lower slaying and offense rates. By criminalizing guns you are merely making jobs for your jurisprudence staying citizen. You are giving felons easy marks because they know their victims will be unarmed. There is no manner for a citizen to protect themselves against felons in life or decease state of affairss affecting guns. Russia proves a premier illustration by holding a prohibition on all pistols yet they have a really high slaying rate. There prohibition has solved nil and truthfully merely created a bigger job. Puting prohibitions on guns will non work out the job and this has been proven true by many states.

Making heavier gun Torahs in the United States will non work out a job, it will make one. This has already been proven in many states with tight gun limitations. In Kennesaw, GA it was proven that having guns helps lower offense rates. Guns are non killing people in America people are killing people. Taking guns from people will non take down your slaying rates ; people are traveling to kill each other. They ever have manner before guns were of all time invented. So what is taking guns traveling to make? You are still traveling to hold slayings if non more. You have defenceless citizens with no manner to protect themselves, I would believe felons would feed off this because they have no challenge to harm their victims. Gun control Torahs will non work out this states job, but making harsher punishments for those perpetrating offenses with guns harsher. I believe this could perchance do felons believe more before perpetrating offenses with pieces. Firearms in America are non the job, the people are.

With gun control going more and more controversial in America people truly need to believe, will censoring guns truly solve the job? It did non for Russia and I candidly believe it will non assist the United States either. The Second amendment is in topographic point for a ground, and it is to protect us as U.S. citizens, without guns citizens would be defenceless. Guns are besides apart of 1000000s of Americans lives whether they be huntsmans, athletics taws or merely proprietors of guns for defence intents. No citizen deserves to hold their guns taken from them unless they do non decently obtain them. Americans should be able to utilize guns for diversion and ego defence intents without holding any restraints against them. Tightening gun limitations is non traveling to assist our state it is traveling to harm it ; this has been proven clip and clip once more. American citizens do non merit to hold their gun rights stripped from them like they are felons, by making this I believe America will see nil but a rise in felons, which is precisely what we are seeking to forestall.


I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out