APLICATION OF PORTER’S FIVE FORCES FRAMEWORK IN THE BANKING INDUSTRY OF TANZANIA: Determine, Develop and Deliver Competitively. By Dr. Elisante Ole Gabriel (PhD) Head of Entrepreneurship Development Centre Faculty of Commerce Mzumbe University P O BOX 6 Dar es Salaam Tanzania [email protected] com : Tel. +255-754-434412 Abstract: The banking industry of Tanzania has been growing fast during the last decade. There are so many things happening within the industry after the liberalization of the sector. The aspect of competition is now crucial for the operators who are within the banking industry.

Porter’s Five Forces Framework is one of the strategic models used to assess the attractiveness of the industry (being service or manufacturing). This model is defined by the five key forces which are; Rivalry among the existing firms, Threat of new entrants, Threat of substitutes, Bargaining power of suppliers and bargaining power of customers. The banking industry of Tanzania has 22 full-fledged banks, 5 Regional unit banks, 5 Financial Institutions and 102 bureux de change operators. The rivalry among the existing banks, threat of new entrants and bargaining power of customers is found to be unfavorable forces to the industry.

Threat of substitutes and bargaining power of suppliers are found to be favorable forces to the industry. The industry is therefore of two starts, hence not attractive. Those who are already in the industry need to operate competitively by using a differentiation strategy to win the confidence of the customers who have higher bargaining power. A good customer service is necessary. This can be achieved through synergy and Total Quality Management (TQM) approach. The forces are not and will never be static but dynamic, hence a need for the banks to be reviewing their strategies from time to time. Introduction: The banking Industry in Tanzania has tremendously changed its dynamics for the last one decade. Many banks have joined the industry both local and foreign. Notably, the nobanks financial institutions have been mushrooming by an alarming speed. For this very reason the players in the banking industry need to consider their competitive positioning and repositioning strategically. In mid 1960s the industry had only one bank, National Bank of Commerce. It can therefore be said that in 1960s the industry had a monopolistic structure.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

In 1986, Corporate and Rural Development Bank (CRDB) was established hence to make the industry to experience a duopolistic market structure. In any industry, including the banking industry, the nature of competition is always a function of the market structure. The trend today is a perfect competition and the central bank has withdrawn from managing the market forces. Banks are now working on their own about what are relevant products and rates to be offered to the market. In this regard the need for the assessment of the attractiveness of the industry becomes a necessity.

Porter’s Five Forces Framework has been widely used in analyzing the attractiveness of an industry. Any firm (in this case a bank) needs to answer two fundamental questions; (i) What makes an industry attractive? (ii) What positions within an industry lead to superior performance? Answering these two questions is vital for any firm, which needs to compete competitively. This article makes a clear discussion of the banking industry in Tanzania and how the Porters Five Forces can be used as a tool of analysis for profitability.

The Banking Industry of Tanzania The industry has various key players. These to include; Fully fledged banks (commercial and non Commercial), Regional Unit Banks, Financial Institutions, Regional Financial Institutions, Regional Unit Financial Institutions and Bureaux de Change. As of December 2005, the banking supervision of the Bank of Tanzania has approved and register the key players of the banking sector of Tanzania as follows: Fully Fledged banks (22), Regional Unit Banks (5), Financial Institutions (5), Bureux de Change (102).

The summary of the player is given as appendices (1 – 5). 3 Fully-fledged Banks. A bank is an institution authorized to receive money on current account subject to withdrawal by cheque. It can offer various products and services including loans, letter of credits, guarantee, etc both locally and internationally. A list of fully-fledged banks operation in Tanzania with the locations of their headquarters is given as Appendix 1. Regional Unit Banks. A regional unit bank is an institution authorized or licensed to operate as a regional unit bank.

The institution may receive money on current account subject to withdrawal by cheque. Since it is a regional unit, it has no mandate to open branches in other regions. A list of licensed regional unit banks operating in Tanzania is given as Appendix 2. Financial Institutions A financial institution is an institution licensed by Bank of Tanzania and authorized to engage in banking business not involving the receipt of money on current account subject to withdrawal by cheque. A list of the licensed financial institutions operating in Tanzania is given as Appendix 3.

Bureaux de Change Operators These are institutions registered by the Bank of Tanzania and entrusted with the task of changing money over the counter. The bureaux are regulated under the Foreign Exchange Act, 1992 and Foreign Exchange (Bureaux de Change) Regulations, 1999. There are 80 operators in Tanzania Mainland and 22 in Zanzibar. This makes a total of 102 operators in the United Republic of Tanzania (Bank of Tanzania, 2005). A list of the registered operators is given as Appendix 4 and 5, for Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar respectively.

Licensing Conditions in the Banking Industry (See Bank of Tanzania Reports, 2005) Any individual or company wishing to establish a bank or financial institution in Tanzania must submit the following information to the Bank of Tanzania: 4 1. Letter of Application in prescribed format. 2. Proposed Memorandum of Association (unregistered with the Registrar of Companies). 3. Proposed Articles of Association (unregistered with the Registrar of Companies). 4. Proof of Availability of Funds for Investment as Capital of the Proposed

Institution e. g bank certification. 5. List of Incorporators/Subscribers and Proposed Members of Board of Directors and Other Senior Officers. 6. Information Sheet of Every Incorporator/Subscriber and Every Proposed Member of the Board of Directors, and Senior Officer. 7. Proof of Citizenship of Every Incorporator/Subscriber and Every Proposed Director and Senior Officer. This Includes Detailed Curricula Vitae (CV), Photocopy of the First Five Pages of a Passport, a Passport Size Photograph and Historical Background. . Audited Balance Sheet and Income Statement of Every Incorporator/Subscriber and Every Proposed Member of the Board of Directors and Senior Officer who is engaged in Business. 9. Certified Copies of Annual Returns of Every Incorporator/Subscriber and Every Proposed Member of the Board of Directors and Senior Officer (together with accompanying schedules/financial statements) Filled During the Last Five Years with Income Tax Office for Income Taxation Purposes. 10. Tax Clearance From the Income Tax Office 11.

Statement From Two Persons (not relatives) Vouching for the Good Moral Character and Financial Responsibility of the Incorporators/Subscribers and the Proposed Directors and Senior Officers. 12. Business Plans for the First Four Years of Operations Including the Strategy for Growth, Branch Expansion Plans, Dividend Payout Policy and Career Development Programme for the Staff, Budgets for the First Year Must Also be Included 13. Projected Annual Balance Sheets for the First Four Years of Operations. 14. Projected Annual Income Statement for the First Four Years of Operation. 15. Projected Annual Cash Flow Statements for the First Four Years of Operation. 16. Discussion of Economic Benefits to be Derived by the Country and the Community From the Proposed Bank/Financial Institution. Other Players in the Industry There are other players, who can also be offering a challenge to the banking sector of Tanzania. These to include some micro finance institutions which offer various products which are either similar or substitute of what the banks are offering. The example for these includes organizations like; FINCA, PRIDE, SACCOS and various NGOs.

To some extent even some passenger transporters and currier companies are providing some substitute products to some customers (E. g A passengers’ transporter: Scandinavia Express Service, offering money transfer service to various parts of the country in Tanzania by charging a reasonable transfer fee = 3% of the amount to be transferred) The availability of the various players makes the industry so competitive and dynamic. This calls for a need for each individual player to operate competitively in order to sustain its business.

The players in the industry need to make a strategic analysis of the industry in order to know the appropriate strategies to be applied in order to sustain the business continuity. One of the useful models in assessing the attractiveness of any industry is Porter’s Five Forces Framework (Porter, 1980) Porter’s Five Forces Framework (PFFF) More than two decades ago, Professor Michael Porter suggested some driving forces which could help to analyse the attractiveness of any industry/sector as well as its competitive positioning. This framework is widely used and known as ‘Porter’s Five Forces’.

Professor Porter invented this model in 1979 and this was published in his book in 1980. Whether the business is service oriented or physical goods, there are always competitive forces in any perfect competitive business environment, like that of the banking sector in Tanzania. 6 Rationale of the Porter’s Five Forces Model in the Banking Industry The model attempts to address key strategic issues in a wider scope. Many of the issues mentioned in the model, including the forces and the management of those forces, are relevant to the banking sector as well as any other service-oriented business.

The results, which will be obtained by the application of this model, should be given the value of the time of the analysis and that a continuous review is necessary in order to avoid to be myopic or obsolete with the results. Michael Porter provided a framework that models an industry as being influenced by five forces (Porter, 1980). Figure 1 provides details of the framework. Figure 1: Porter’s Five Forces Framework THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS -Absolute cost advantages -Learning curve SUPPLIERS’ POWER -Supplier concentration – Inputs differentiation

DEGREE OF RIVALRY -Exit barriers -Products -Switching costs -Brand identity BUYERS’ POWER -Bargaining leverage. –Buyers’ information. THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES -Switching costs -Buyer inclination to substitute SOURCE: Porter, M E. (1980) 7 It is a model of pure competition, which implies that risk-adjusted rates of return should be constant across firms and industries. However, numerous economic studies have affirmed that different industries can sustain different levels of profitability; part of this difference is explained by industry structure.

Any strategic business manager seeking to develop an edge over rival firms can use this model to better understand the industry context in which the firm operates. The manager can then use the analysis as a basic tool for strategic decision making for the current situation or future. The banking sector of Tanzania can also consider the application of this model for some strategic decision processes. A discussion of each component of the model is as follows; Degree of rivalry In the traditional economic model, competition among rival firms drives profits to zero.

However, competition is not perfect and firms are not unsophisticated passive price takers. Rather, firms (banks) strive for a competitive advantage over their rivals. The intensity of rivalry among firms varies across industries, and strategic analysts are interested in these differences. These differences give some firms a competitive advantage while to others a disadvantage. These differences also pose a challenge to the uniform application of this model across the board. Economists measure rivalry by indicators of industry concentration.

The Concentration Ratio (CR) is one of such measures. A high concentration ratio indicates that a high concentration of market share is held by the largest firms – the industry is concentrated. With only a few firms holding a large market share, the competitive landscape is less competitive (closer to a monopoly). A low concentration ratio indicates that the industry is characterized by many rivals, none of which has a significant market share. These fragmented markets are said to be competitive.

The concentration ratio is not the only available measure; the trend is to define industries in terms that convey more information than distribution of market share. If rivalry among firms in an industry is low, the industry is considered to be disciplined. This discipline may result from the industry’s history of competition, the role of a leading firm, or informal compliance with a generally understood code of conduct. Explicit collusion generally is illegal and not an option; in low-rivalry industries competitive 8 moves must be constrained informally.

However, a maverick firm seeking a competitive advantage can displace the otherwise disciplined market. When a rival acts in a way that elicits a counter-response by other firms, rivalry intensifies. The intensity of rivalry commonly is referred to as being cutthroat, intense, moderate, or weak, based on the firms’ aggressiveness in attempting to gain an advantage. In pursuing an advantage over its rivals, a firm (in this case a bank) can choose from several competitive moves: • • Changing prices – raising or lowering prices to gain a temporary advantage.

Improving product differentiation – improving features, implementing innovations in the manufacturing process and in the product itself. The banks can equally reposition themselves from the ‘old way’ the customers have been perceiving them. Those institutions, which will differentiate their products from others, will have a unique opportunity to attract customers at a premium price. A good example for this is the way Barclays bank is charging a premium fee for customers of ‘queueless category’. These customers have no time to wait in a queue hence ready to pay any fee for them to be treated differently. • Creatively using channels of distribution – using vertical integration or using a distribution channel that is novel to the industry. Exploiting relationships with suppliers. The intensity of rivalry is influenced by the following industry characteristics: (i) A larger number of firms increases rivalry because more firms must compete for the same customers and resources. The rivalry intensifies if the firms have similar market share, leading to a struggle for market leadership. (ii) Slow market growth causes firms to fight for market share.

In a growing market, firms are able to improve revenues simply because of the expanding market. (iii) High fixed costs result in an economy of scale effect that increases rivalry. When total costs are mostly fixed costs, the firm must produce near capacity to attain the lowest unit costs. Since the firm must sell this large quantity of 9 products, high levels of production lead to a fight for market share and results in increased rivalry. (iv) High storage costs or highly perishable products cause a producer to sell goods as soon as possible.

If other producers are attempting to unload at the same time, competition for customers intensifies. (v) Low switching costs increases rivalry. When a customer can freely switch from one product to another there is a greater struggle to capture customers. In the case of banking sector in Tanzania, the switching cost has become very low. Some competing banks a located just adjacent to one another (eg CRDB Holland House and Kenya Commercial bank). Some of the banks are located in the same building (E. Stanbic Bank and African Banking Corporation, both of them in Sukari House Building, see Table 1a). (vi) Low levels of product differentiation are associated with higher levels of rivalry. Brand identification, on the other hand, tends to constrain rivalry. (vii) Strategic stakes are high when a firm is losing market position or has potential for great gains. This intensifies rivalry. (viii) High exit barriers place a high cost on abandoning the product. The firm must compete. High exit barriers cause a firm to remain in an industry, even when the venture is not profitable.

A common exit barrier is asset specificity. (ix) A diversity of rivals with different cultures, histories, and philosophies make an industry unstable. There is greater possibility for mavericks and for misjudging rival’s moves. Rivalry is volatile and can be intense. (x) Industry Shakeout. A growing market and the potential for high profits induces new firms to enter a market and incumbent firms to increase production. A point is reached where the industry becomes crowded with competitors, and demand cannot support the new entrants and the resulting increased supply.

The industry may become crowded if its growth rate slows and the market becomes saturated, creating a situation of excess capacity with too many goods chasing too few buyers. A shakeout ensues, with intense competition, price wars, and company failures. The founder of Boston Consulting Group (BCG) model, Bruce Henderson, generalized this 10 observation as the Rule of Three and Four: a stable market will not have more than three significant competitors, and the largest competitor will have no more than four times the market share of the smallest.

If this rule is true, it implies that: • • • • • If there is a larger number of competitors, a shakeout is inevitable. Surviving rivals will have to grow faster than the market. Eventual losers will have a negative cash flow if they attempt to grow. All except the two largest rivals will be losers. The definition of what constitutes the “market” is strategically important. Whatever the merits of this rule (Three & Four) for stable markets, it is clear that market stability and changes in supply and demand affect rivalry. Cyclical demand tends to create cutthroat competition.

Threat of Substitutes In Porter’s model, substitute products refer to products in other industry. To the economist, a threat of substitutes exists when a product’s demand is affected by the price change of a substitute product. A product’s price elasticity is affected by substitute products – as more substitutes become available, the demand becomes more elastic since customers have more alternatives. A close substitute product constrains the ability of firms (banks) in an industry to raise prices. The competition engendered by a Threat of Substitute comes from products outside the industry.

In the banking sector, there are so many products and at the same time there are so many substitute products. For example if someone is looking for a travelers cheque and that could not be provided, one might decide to opt for Telegraphic Transfer. Buyers’ bargaining power The power of buyers is the impact that customers have on a buying process of the products from a certain industry. In general, when buyers’ power is strong, the relationship to the industry is near to what an economist terms a monopsony – a market in which there are many suppliers and one buyer.

Under such market conditions, the buyer 11 sets the price. In reality few pure monopsonies exist, but frequently there is some asymmetry between a producing industry and buyers. The same case can as well be applied to the service industry, as nowadays there is no pure-manufacturing or pureservice industry. The combination is the way forward. The only vital difference is the definition of the ‘core product’. For instance much as we consider banks to be under the service industry, physical properties like furniture, building, computers, etc are vital to make the service a possibility.

Suppliers’ bargaining power A producing industry requires raw materials – labour, components, and other supplies. This requirement leads to buyer-supplier relationships between the industry and the firms that provide the raw materials used to create products. Suppliers, if powerful, can exert an influence on the producing industry, such as selling raw materials at a high price to capture some of the industry’s profits. In a service sector there is no direct supplier of raw material. However the supply of supporting facilities like cheque books, furniture, stationeries, etc can give the same analogy.

Barriers to entry / Threat of new entrants It is not only incumbent rivals that pose a threat to firms in an industry; the possibility that new firms may enter the industry also affects competition. In theory, any firm should be able to enter and exit a market, and if free entry and exit exists, then profits always should be nominal. In reality, however, industries possess characteristics that protect the high profit levels of firms in the market and inhibit additional rivals from entering the market. These are barriers to entry. Barriers to entry are more than the normal equilibrium adjustments that markets typically make.

For example, when industry profits increase, we would expect additional firms to enter the market to take advantage of the high profit levels, over time driving down profits for all firms in the industry. When profits decrease, we would expect some firms to exit the market thus restoring market equilibrium. Falling prices, or the expectation that future prices will fall, deters rivals from entering a market. Firms also may be 12 reluctant to enter markets that are extremely uncertain, especially if entering involves expensive start-up costs.

These are normal accommodations to market conditions. But if firms individually (collective action would be illegal collusion) keep prices artificially low as a strategy to prevent potential entrants from entering the market, such entrydeterring pricing establishes a barrier. Barriers to entry are unique industry characteristics that define the industry. Barriers reduce the rate of entry of new firms, thus maintaining a level of profits for those already in the industry. From a strategic perspective, barriers can be created or exploited to enhance a firm’s competitive advantage.

If it happens that for a certain industry there are low entry barriers but high exit barriers, then this situation is referred as ‘the worst situation of competition’ in that particular industry. Dynamic Nature of Industry Rivalry Schumpeter and, more recently, Porter have attempted to move the understanding of industry competition from a static economic or industry organization model to an emphasis on the interdependence of forces as dynamic, or punctuated equilibrium, as Porter terms it. In Schumpeter’s and Porter’s view the dynamism of markets is driven by innovation.

The banking industry of Tanzania is equally facing a lot of dynamism and the dynamics will keep on changing over time at an increasing speed. Mapping the Banking Industry of Tanzania within PFFF: Is it attractive? It is imperative at this stage to make a succinct application of PFFF to the banking industry of Tanzania and make an objective assessment about the attractive ness of the industry. One key assumption needs to be made before the mapping. This is to assume that the model is considered INSIDE-OUTSIDE approach. This is to say, the analysis is done considering the full-fledged banks being in the industry already.

The analysis of the forces always does change the direction when the perspective is outside-inside. Competition among the existing fully-fledged banks: There are 22 banks, which are recognized and licensed to operate in Tanzania (Bank of Tanzania report, 2005). Looking on the trend of dates of commencement of business of these 22 banks, 19 of them commenced just within ten years (1995 – 2005). This is 86% 13 of the registered banks. This gives a clear signal that the increase of the number of banks within the industry is fast and in any case there is now a great struggle for banks to create and maintain a good market share.

Though there might be an increase of the number of customers, but that cannot dilute the fact that there is a tension of competition between the existing rivals in the industry. Therefore, this element of PFFF in respect of the banking sector in Tanzania is now ranked unfavorable. The unfavorable forces will be indicated by a minus sign (-) while favorable will be marked by a plus sign (+). Threat of New Entrants: The Bank of Tanzania has set a minimum capital requirement of 1 billion for a bank to be registered.

However, this amount has been raised to 5 billion and it is expected that by the year 2008, it should be fully operational. The conditions set for registering a bank are not all that much complex, hence entry barriers become low. There are also 5 Regional unit banks (see Appendix 2), which stand a better chance to convert to full-fledged banks. There are also 5 Financial institutions (see Appendix 3), which have established themselves very well hence to make easy for them to convert to banks. All these make the entry barriers much lower.

Bearing in mind the early assumption made (Insideoutside perspective), for the banks, which are within the industry, this is an unfavorable condition. However, for the prospective new entrants who are outside the status of fullfledged banks, it is a favorable condition. Therefore for the analysis based on the existing full-fledged banks in the industry, to them, this force bears a negative sign (-) Threat of Substitute Products: Though there are 5 regional unit banks, 5 financial institutions and 102 bureux de change operators, there are some features and products of which they can only be obtained from the fully-fledged banks.

These to include; broad network of operations, Current account, etc. For this reason, this force is favorable to the full-fledged banks. It therefore bears a positive sign (+). 14 Bargaining Power of Suppliers: The core business of the banking industry is ‘service’ which mainly focuses on safety of wealth. The suppliers do provide some tangibles like chequebooks, furniture, etc. The impact of this in business is not significant since they are not really like the raw material. Therefore this is a favorable force in this industry hence it bears a positive sign (+).

Bargaining Power of Customers: Having the whole range of players apart from the full-fledged banks, it is evident that customers can move within the 22 operators as full-fledge banks and can also decide to switch to the Regional Unit banks or financial institutions. Their choice can even extend to the NGOs, depending on the nature of the product. For instance if a customer is looking for a small amount of loan, he/she can even get the said product from organizations like FINCA, PRIDE, etc. The close location of various banks is also giving customer a very high bargaining power.

For instance in the city of Dar Es salaam, consider the Ohio Street, off Ali Hassan Mwinyi Road to the junction of Sokoine drive, there is only a distance of about 600 Metres. Along that street you find the following banks located very close or opposite to each other; Barclays bank (close to Akiba Commercial Bank), CRDB Bank (Tower Branch), Kenya Commercial Bank, CRDB Bank (Holland House Branch), Baroda bank, Standard Chartered (opposite to Stanbic Bank and African Banking Corporation) and Eurafrican Bank. This implies 9 brands within just a distance of 600 metres.

With this concentration the bargaining of customers always goes high before customers start looking on a differentiated service. Therefore, to the full-fledged banks within the industry this is an unfavorable condition, hence bearing a negative sign (-) From the above analysis of the five forces as mapped in the banking industry of Tanzania, we can summarize the outcome by showing the sign of each force as follows: Rivalry among the existing full-fledged banks (-), Threat of New entrants (-), Threat of substitute products (+), Bargaining power of Suppliers (+), Bargaining Power of Customers (-).

This outcome can be shown diagrammatically as follows (see Figure 2). 15 Figure 2: The Porter’s Five Forces Framework of the Banking Industry of Tanzania THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS (-) BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS RIVALRY AMONG EXISTING BANKS BARGAINING POWER OF CUSTOMERS (+) (-) THREAT OF SUBSTITUTE PRODUCTS (-) (+) Source, Research Survey and analysis From Figure 2 above, the banking industry has two favorable forces and three unfavorable. From this analysis the industry is considered to be of TWO STARS. Conclusion The banking industry of Tanzania has been growing at a high speed for the last decade.

Out of 22 banks, 19 of them have been licensed within a decade. These are good news to 16 the customers. On the other hand this has increased a tremendous competition within the industry. The bargaining power of the customers is high and also barriers to entry are gentle hence allowing more entrants to get to the industry. Finally the Porter’s Five Forces Frameworks reveals that this industry is of TWO starts. This implies that two (Bargaining Power of Suppliers and Threat of substitutes) forces are favorable to those who are already full-fledged banks.

Three forces are unfavorable. It is therefore urged from this analysis that on average the industry is not attractive. This implies that for the bank to survive profitably in the industry, it needs to choose a strategy, which can lead to a possibility of charging premium price for some products (Kotler, 1991). Since customers have a high bargaining power, it is imperative for the banks to make sure that they have a customer retention strategy in place. In this industry therefore, it is about survival of the fittest. There is no room for losers but winners only.

If in the future the Tanzanian Government implements the condition of the increase of the required initial capital from 1 billion to 5 billion, this will have a direct impact on the ‘threat of new entrants’. This force might change and become favorable to the industry for those who are already within the industry. It should be borne in mind that these forces are not and will never be static. Therefore, when they change in the future, there will be a shift on the attractiveness of the industry. Bibliography Ansoff, I. (1957) ‘Strategies for Diversification’, Harvard Business Review.

September – October (p. 113 – 124). Barnes, J G. (2001) Secrets of Customer Relationship Management: It’s All About How You Make Them Feel, New York: McGraw-Hill. Burnett, J. (1998) Introduction to Marketing Communication, London: Prentice Hall International. Carlzon J. (1989) Moments of Truth London: Harper & Row. Christopher, M G. , Payne, A. and Ballantyne, D. (2002) Relationship Marketing: Creating Stakeholder Value, 2nd Edition, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Christopher, M. , Payne, A. and Ballantyne, D. (1991) Relationship Marketing, London: Prentice Hall. 7 Davidow, H W. (1990) Total Customer Service: The Ultimate Weapon, New York: Prentice Hall. Druker P. F, (1989) ‘What Business Can Learn from Nonprofits,’ Harvard Business Review, July – August, p. 88-93. Fill, C. (1999) Marketing Communications: Contexts, Contents and Strategies, 2nd Edition, London: Prentice Hall. Gabbott, M. , Hogg, G. (1996) Consumers and Services, New York: John Wiley & Sons. Gabbott, M. et al, (2003) An Introduction to Marketing: A Value Exchange Approach, Harlow: Pearson Education/Monash University, (forthcoming). Gabriel, E. 2002) ‘Export Marketing Strategies: A Global Communication Emphasis’ The African Journal of Finance and Management, Vol. 11, Number 1 (p 49 –59). Gabriel, E. (2003) ‘Choosing an Epistemic Stance’ The African Journal of Finance and Management Vol. 11, Number 2 (p 59 –64). Garvin, G A. (1987) ‘Competing on the eight dimensions of Quality’, Harvard Business Review, November – December. Glueck, W. (1988) Strategic Management and Business Policy, London: McGraw-Hill. Glynn, J W. and Barnes, J G. (Eds. ) (1995) Understanding Services Management, New York: John Wiley & Sons. Gronroos, C. (1990) Service Management and Marketing: Managing Moments of Truth in Service Competition. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Gronroos, C. , (1997) ‘Value-driven Relations Marketing: From Products to Resources and Competencies. ’ Journal of Marketing Management, Volume 13, Number 5, p. 407419. Gronroos, C. , (1987) Developing the Service Offering – A Source of Competitive Advantage. In Surprenant, C. (ed. ), Add Value to Your Service. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association. Gronroos, C. , (2000) Services Management and Marketing: A Customer Relationship Management Approach, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Gummesson, E. , (1999) Total Relationship Marketing Management: From 4Ps to 30Rs. Oxford: Butterworth Heineman. 18 Hamel, G and Prahalad, C. K (1994) Competing for the Future, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Johnson, G. and Scholes, K. (1989) Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases, 2nd Edition, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International. Kotler, P and Andreasen, A. , (1991) Strategic Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations 4th ed. , Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Lynch, R. , (2000) Corporate Strategy, 2nd Ed. London: Prentice Hall International. McKenna, R. (1991) Relationship Marketing: Own the Market Through Strategic Customer Relationships, London: Century Business Books. Mintzberg, H. (1998) The Strategy Process, London: Prentice Hall. Palmer, A. and Worthington, I. (1992) The Business and Marketing Environment, London: McGraw-Hill. Porter, M E. (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors, New York: The Free Press. Porter, M E. (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: The Free Press.

Rumelt, P. (1991), Richard, P (ed, 1994) Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda, Harvard Business School Press. Varey, R J. and Gabriel, E. (2000) ‘How Can a Relational Strategy Contribute to Service Competition of Two Modes of Passengers Transport? ’ 13th UK Conference for services marketing, University of Nottingham. Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (1998) Strategy: Process, Content, Context, 2nd Edition, London: Thomson Business Press. Zelditch, M. (1962) ‘Some Methodological Problems of Field Studies’ American Journal of Sociology, Volume 67, Number 5, p. 66-576. www. bot-tz. org 19 APPENDIX 1: Fully-fledged Banks and their Headquarter Location in Tanzania NO. NAME OF BANK PHYSICAL LOCATION DATE OF OF HEAD OFFICE COMMENCE MENT OF BUSINESS Robert DEC. 1993 TEL. : 2122125, 2122129, Shaaban TELEPHONE & FAX NUMBERS 1 Standard Chartered Bank 2122140, 2122143 St/Garden Ave, (T) Ltd FAX: -2113770/2122157 DSM Stanbic Bank (T) TEL. : 2666430/2196400 Ltd MD: 2196301 FAX: 2666301 Ohio Street, DSM 2 2/5/1995 3 Citi Bank (T) Ltd TEL. : 2117575, 2117601 Alli Hassin Mwinyi RD, FAX: 2113910, 2117576 DSM Federal Bank of TEL. 2126000 the Middle East FAX: 2126006 (T) Ltd Samora Avenue, DSM MAY, 1995 4 JULY, 2003 5 Eurafrican Bank TEL. : 2110928, 2111229, Kivukoni/Ohio Street, (T) Ltd 2110104 ,2114975 DSM FAX: 2113740 Diamond Trust Bank (T) Ltd Exim Bank (T) Ltd NBC Limited TEL. : 2114888-92 Jamhuri/India Street, FAX: 2114210, 2118953 DSM TEL. : 2113091/3 Samora Avenue, FAX: 2119737, 2121791 DSM TEL. : 2113914, 2112082, City Drive RD, DSM 2111803 FAX: 2112887/MD’S 2112887 NOV. 1994 6 MARCH, 1997 AUG. 1997 7 8 1/10/1997 9 National Microfinance Bank Ltd CRDB Bank Ltd TEL. 2118785, 2116925/9, (2124048 MD) FAX: 2114058 TEL. : 2117442-7 FAX: 2116714 Samora Avenue, DSM 1/10/1997 10 Azikiwe Street, DSM 2/10/1996 11 The Peoples’ Bank of Zanzibar Ltd TEL. : 2231118/2231120/ Stone-Town, 2133967 ZNZ FAX: 2231121 1/7/1966 20 NO. NAME OF BANK TELEPHONE & FAX NUMBERS PHYSICAL LOCATION DATE OF OF HEAD OFFICE COMMENCE MENT OF BUSINESS Alli Hassin Mwinyi RD, DSM Samora Ave/ Ohio St, DSM AUG. 1997 12 Akiba Commercial Bank Ltd Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd. International Commercial Bank (T) Ltd. Habib African Bank Ltd Barclays Bank (T) Ltd United Bank of Africa CF Union Bank Ltd

TEL. : 2118340-4 FAX: 2114173 TEL. : 21153868/2115390 FAX: 2115391 13 6/10/1997 14 TEL. : 2110518, 2110538, Upanga / Kisutu 2110571/ Street, DSM HQ. 2134990/1 FAX: 2110196 TEL. : 2111107 FAX: 2111014 India Street, DSM 16/2/1998 15 16 6/3/1998 19/10/2000 Tel. 2129381, 2129758 Ohio Street, DSM Fax. 2129757 Tel. 2130113 Fax: 2130116 2130127 PPF House, Samora DSM 17 22/4/2002 18 Tel. 2117880, 2110212, Indira Gandhi St. / Morogoro Rd 2118750 DSM Fax. 2118750 Tel. 2111990 Fax. 2112402 TEL: 2118625/8 FAX: 2116733 TEL: 2117997/9 FAX: 2118010/11 Sukari House, Ohio St. DSM Mission St. Samora Avenue, DSM Samora Avenue DSM 1/4/2002 19 African Banking Corporation (T) Ltd Savings and Finance Bank Limited Azania Bancorp 3/6/2002 20 21 DEC 2000 22 Bank of Baroda TEL: 2124487/2124472 Ohio/Sokoine Drive DSM 13/10/2004 Source: Bank of Tanzania reports, December 2005 21 APPENDIX 2: Regional Unit Banks operating in Tanzania NO. NAME OF THE REGIONAL UNIT BANK Kilimanjaro Cooperative Bank Limited Kagera Farmers Co-operative Bank Mbinga Community Bank Dar es Salaam Community Bank Uchumi Commercial Bank TELEPHONE & FAX NUMBER TEL: 027 2754470/1 FAX: 027 2753570 DL. 28 – 2220041 TEL: 028-2220018 TEL: 025 2640719 FAX: 025 2640000 Tel. 2180253 Fax. 2180259 Tel. 027 2750491 Fax: 027 2750492 Anatouglou Hall, Mnazi Mmoja KKT Building Kilimanjaro OCT. 2001 PHYSICAL LOCATION DATE OF OF HEADQUATERS COMMENCE MENT OF BUSINESS Mawenzi Road Moshi Bukoba Township Kagera Mbinga 10/7/1996 1 2 AUG. 2002 3 JULY 2003 4 5 19th Septe. 2005 Source, Bank of Tanzania Reports, December 2005. APPENDIX 3: Financial Institutions operating in Tanzania (See BoT Reports, 2005) NO.

NAME OF THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTION Tanzania Investment Bank TELEPHONE & FAX NUMBER TEL: 2111708/13 FAX: 2113438 PHYSICAL LOCATION DATE OF OF HEADQUATERS COMMENCE MENT OF BUSINESS Samora Avenue DSM Samora Avenue DSM Samora Avenue DSM Mufindi Township Iringa Mwanga Township Kilimanjaro JAN. 1994 1 2 3 4 Tanzania Postal TEL: 2112358/60 Bank FAX: 2114815 Twiga Bancorp TEL: 2115575/2118455 Limited FAX: 2112350 Mufindi Community Bank Mwanga Community Bank TEL: 026 7721165 FAX: 026 2772075 TEL: 027-2757830 FAX:027 2754235 OCT. 1993 SEPT 1998 1/6/1999 5 OCT. 2000 22 Table 4: Bureaux de Change Operators in Tanzania Mainland

BUREAUX DE CHANGE OPERATING IN TANZANIA – MAINLAND S. No. Bureau de Change Name Postal Address 14025 2481 11169 8277 999 7302 7302 362 2288 604 2075 7356 11169 7302 11707 1516 14793 City/Town Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Arusha Physical Address Joel Maeda Road Stadium Road Sokeine Road Boma Road Sakina, Nairobi Road Kijenge Commercial Center Joel Maeda Street Uchumi House Uhuru Road Joel Maeda Road Boma Road Golden Rose Hotel Annex Col Middleton Road Sokoine Road Boma Road Sokoine Road Sokoine Road Arusha Airport.

Sokoine Road 1 Exchange Centre Bureau de Change 2 Heldal (1) Stadium Bureau de Change 3 Hedal (II) Sokoni Bureau de Change 4 King’s Bureau de Change 5 Lions Bureau de Change 6 Motel Impala Bureau de Change 7 Northern Bureau de Change 8 Benush Bureau de Change 9 Camel Bureau de Change 10 West East Bureau de Change Money Wise Forex Bureau de 11 Change 12 Sanya Bureau de Change 13 Arusha Forex Bureau de Change 14 Classic Bureau de Change 15 Clock Tower Bureau de Change 16 Luwanze Bureau de Change 17 Roika Bureau de Change 23 8 Pesame Bureau de change 19 Tanganyika Bureau de Change 20 Al-abry Bureau de Change 21 Alpha Bureau de Change 22 Amafhh Bureau de Change 23 Bureau de Change 2000 24 Crown Bureau de Change 25 Equity Bureau de Change Galaxy Money Changers Bureau de 26 Change 27 Galaxy Bureau de Change 28 Globax Bureau de Change 29 Kai Bureau de Change 30 Kariakoo Bureau de Change 31 King’s Palace Bureau de Change 32 Local Curency Bureau de Change 33 M. G. M Bureau de Change 34 Masai Bureau de Change 35 Maxcare Bureau de Change 36 Mcsoms Bureau de Change 37 Mobile Bureau de Change 1525 6143 5464 Arusha Arusha Boma Road AICC Complex Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue – IPS Building 70190 Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue – IPS Building 4504 Dar-es-Salaam Oysterbay Shopping Complex 20263 Dar-es-Salaam Jamhuri Street Ilala 6672 283 Dar-es-Salaam Zanaki/ India Streets Dar-es-Salaam Royal Palm Hotel 21219 Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue/ Bridge Street 21219 Dar-es-Salaam Dsm International Air port Samora/Azikiwe Street 21219 Dar-es-Salaam Coronation House. 21530 Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue. 175 8297 5331 816 4907 Dar-es-Salaam Swahili/Narung’ombe Street Dar-es-Salaam Sikukuu Street – Kariakoo Dar-es-Salaam DIA Terminal II Dar-es-Salaam Morogoro Road Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue 79300 Dar-es-Salaam Namanga Shopping Centre 4504 Dar-es-Salaam India/Makunganya St. 75639 Dar-es-Salaam Jamhuri Street – Ilala 24 38 Money Link Bureau de Change 39 Oriental Bureau de Change 40 Prudential Bureau de Change 41 Rocks Bureau de Change 42 Ruby Bureau de Change 43 S. H.

Amon Bureau de Change 44 Sharif Alwi Bureau de Change 45 Small Bureau de Change 46 Trade Bureau de Change 47 Tristar Bureau de Change 48 Unique Bureau de Change 49 Waljis Bureau de Change 50 West Bureau de Change 51 BS (Swiss) Bureau de Change 52 Palace Hotel Bureau de Change 53 Golden Bureau de Change 54 Rasilimali Bureau de Change 55 Mermaid Bureau de Change 56 The Terminal Bureau de change 57 Dahab Shiil Bureau de change 7177 2554 9163 Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue Dar-es-Salaam IPS Building Samora Avenue. Lehmans Building, Samora Dar-es-Salaam Avenue. 70980 Dar-es-Salaam Mbezi Beach 21718 Dar-es-Salaam Jamhuri Street.

IPS Building Samora/Azikiwe 72483 Dar-es-Salaam Street 3199 6672 Dar-es-Salaam U. W. T Street Dar-es-Salaam Crescent Flats 20066 Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue 2554 3269 434 5252 906 Dar-es-Salaam Tazara Railway Station Dar-es-Salaam Samora /Morogoro Road Dar-es-Salaam Indira Gandhi/Zanaki Street Dar-es-Salaam Railway/Samora Avenue Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue 31673 Dar-es-Salaam 85 Sikukuu Street 4438 9373 Dar-es-Salaam 739-23I Indira Gandhi St. Sokoine Drive, Tacoshili Dar-es-Salaam Building 21032 Dar-es-Salaam Kaluta Street 31673 Dar-es-Salaam Ubungo BusTerminal 21855 Dar-es-Salaam Livingstone Street 25 8 Livingstone Bureau de Change 59 Worldwide Money Exchange 60 Jamani Bureau de Change 61 Amani Bureau de Change 62 S. H. Amon II Bureau de Change 63 Samora Bureau de Change 64 Riki Bureau de Change 65 Riki Hotel Bureau de Change 66 Seaside Money Changer BDC 67 Financial Agency Bureau de Change 68 Toreda Bureau de Change 69 City Exchange Bureau de Change 70 Joshua Bureau de Change 71 Reality Bureau de Change 72 Arcade Bureau de Change 73 DCT Bureau Bureau de Change 74 Panjatan Bureau de Change 75 Chase Bureau de Change 76 Executive Bureau de Change 77 Trast Bureau de Change Livingstone/Pemba House 79610 Dar-es-Salaam No. 4 76142 Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue – IPS Building 7495 Dar-es-Salaam Dar es salaam Airpot 42571 Dar-es-Salaam Dar es salaam 72483 Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue – IPS Building 8954 Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue 31673 Dar-es-Salaam Riki Hotel 31673 Dar-es-Salaam Kleist Sykes 3270 Dar-es-Salaam Toure Drive Oysterbay 7732 Dar-es-Salaam India Street – Arusha 4082 Dar-es-Salaam Ilala 76142 Dar-es-Salaam Samora Avenue – IPS Building 60576 Dar-es-Salaam Shauri Moyo Street 22164 Dar-es-Salaam Mosque/Indira Gandhi 38132 Dar-es-Salaam Old Bagamoyo Road 15 156 315 586 8540 Dodoma Kigoma Moshi Moshi Moshi Kuu Street Dodoma Lumumba Road Subzali Building Section 1 Moshi Soko Kuu 26 78 DBK Bureau Bureau de Change 79 Victoria Bureau Bureau de Change 80 Boma Forex Bureau de Change 308 19275 1151 Mwanza Mwanza Tanga Bantu Street New Mwanza Hotel Indepence Avenue

Source: Bank of Tanzania reports, December 2005. APPENDIX 5: Bureux de Change Operators in Zanzibar BUREAUX DE CHANGE OPERATING IN ZANZIBAR S/No Bureaux Name Postal Address 1739 1537 4222 2744 3781 3784 3567 1732 992 992 3784 2068 3784 City/Town Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Physical Address Darajani Darajani Youth League Shangani Street, Old Stone Town Malindi Kenyata Road, Shangani Kiembe Samaki Gizenga Kiponda Street Airport Shangani Street House No. 37 Malindi Shangani Street Kiembe Samaki 1 Icon Bureau de Change 2 Express Bureau de Change 3 Shangani Bureau de Change 4 Adams Exchange Bureau de Change Ndame Bureau de Change 6 Arrival Bureau de Change 7 Eagle Bureau de Change 8 Accurate Bureau de Change 9 10 Local Currency Airport Bureau de Change Local Currency Shangani Bureau de Change 11 New Malindi Bureau de Change 12 New Stone Town Bureau de Change 13 Departure Bureau de Change 27 14 Queens Bureau de Change 15 Hilmy Bureau de Change 16 Darajani Bureau de Change 17 Baghani Bureau de Change 18 El Riyami Bureau de Change 20 Universal Bureau de Change 1739 271 245 1642 1 1732 Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Zanzibar Shangani Street Airport Darajani Baghani Gizenga Street Mchangani 21 Old Market Bureau de Change 22 Five Stars Bureau de Change 3684 42 Zanzibar Zanzibar Darajani Malindi Source: Bank of Tanzania reports, December 2005. 28


I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out