Relationship between client satisfaction and hotel properties, such as ; service or installations, will impact the penchant of person in taking a hotel. Research in hotel choice standard has focused on the relationship between client satisfaction and service quality or services and installations. Whether or non they have experienced or it is their first clip remaining in a certain hotel, the hotel merchandises features which are intangible, inseparable, variable and perishable can make a perceptual experience to the possible clients every bit good as outlook which may consequences in future backing ( Parusaraman et al. , 1985 ; Bitner, 1990 ) . The properties, characteristics or benefits of the hotel consumer merchandises can straight act upon possible consumers to take a certain hotel to remain which acts as deciding properties. The opportunity to get possible clients increased when there is a property that is different with the rivals ( Alpert, 1971 ; Kivela, 1996 ) .

Wuest et Al, ( 1996 ) mentioned that travelers ‘ satisfaction can be increased by service qualities and installations given that match their perceptual experiences of hotel properties. Furthermore, there have been researches on demands and features of travelers. Many research workers have found that travelers consider the cleanliness, location, room rate, service quality, security and repute of the hotel ( Lewis, 1984 & A ; 1985 ; Atkinson, 1988 ; Cardotte and Turgeonm, 1988 ; Wilkinsky and Buttle, 1988 ; Burton, 1990 ; Rivers et al. , 1991 ; Ananth et al. , 1992 ; Marshall, 1993 ; McCleary et al. , 1993 ; Clow et al. , 1994 ; Clow et al. , 1994 ) . Atkinson ( 1998 ) findings showed that first of all the client will see cleanliness of the hotel as the most of import thing, security comes into 2nd, followed by the value for money and last but non least is the service quality provided purchase the staff such as helpfulness, earnestness and courtesy. This is strengthened by a research that mentioned travelers truly take personal service, physical properties of the hotel, criterion of service, image and worth for money into their consideration ( Wilensky and Buttle, 1998 ) .

The consequences of Rivers ‘ et Al ( 1991 ) survey in analyzing factors impacting hotel choice for members and non-members in a hotel showed that convenience of location is the most of import thing after service. Furthermore, Ananth et Al ( 1992 ) research asked 510 travellers to name down 57 hotel properties in taking a hotel. The consequence was monetary value and quality was the precedence in choosing a hotel irrespective the age of the invitees, security and convenience of location come in their head after monetary value and quality. Furthermore, there are five hotel factors that attract and signaling hotel ‘s image to the invitees which are: physical environment, individuality of hotel, staff, service quality and handiness ( LeBlanc and Nguyen, 1996 ) . They besides suggested foregrounding the environmental factors in hotel selling attempts in order to pull possible clients.

Properties of Customer Satisfaction in Hotels

Harmonizing to Wilkins et Al ( 2007 ) , clients have perceived value of the properties to judge the hotel service quality during their stay in a hotel and Ekinci et Al ( 2008 ) found that physical and service qualities of a hotel drama of import function on client satisfaction. The standards or factors sometimes are related to intangibleness of service, tangibleness of physical basicss and factor of “ value for money ” for case, are more complicated to be determined ( Mohsin and Lockyer, 2010 ) .

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Normally, service or client service are related to intangible elements of a hotel every bit good as understanding the division of hotel direction, warrant and the easiness of covering minutess during a hotel stay. These sort of intangible elements in a hotel are every bit good received by eating house clients. While the touchable elements are usually associated with the physical installations or properties of the hotel, the handiness and quality of installations provided in a hotel, for case ; installations in the room itself ( for illustration: air conditioner, java machine and towels or bathrobe ) every bit good as installations in the full hotel ( for illustration: swimming pool and fittingness installations ) .

The employees ‘ physical visual aspect ( for illustration: uniform ) , the cleanliness of the public country of the hotel ( for illustration: anteroom and corridor ) every bit good as the cleanliness of the room itself are besides included in physical factors of the hotel. If the hotel owns a eating house in the hotel itself, the cleanliness of the country and the nutrient quality of the eating house are besides portion of physical property that affect invitees ‘ opinion of the hotel ( Han et al. , 2009 ; Wu and Liang, 2009 ) .

Customers use a assortment of properties to judge the quality of service that they receive

during their stay in a hotel ( Wilkins et al. , 2007 ) . Both physical and service qualities of

a hotel have positive impact on client satisfaction ( Ekinci et al. , 2008 ) . Some of these standards or factors are related to the intangible service elements, some are related to the touchable physical elements, while some other factors for case “ value for money ” are more complex to specify ( Mohsin and Lockyer, 2010 ) . The intangible elements are basically service related – client service, understanding and caring on the portion of hotel direction, confidence, and the comparative convenience of covering with minutess while remaining in a hotel. This will besides include the service that the client receives at the eating house, if any, in the hotel.

The touchable elements are basically related to the physical installations – the handiness and quality of assorted installations in the room ( e.g. java installations and bathrobe ) and in the full hotel ( e.g. swimming pool and gym ) . The physical visual aspect of hotel forces, the cleanliness of the room every bit good as the full hotel will besides be included in the physical elements. If the hotel has its ain eating house for usage by the invitees, the cleanliness of the eating house and quality of nutrient are besides some of the physical elements clients use to judge the quality of a hotel ( Han et al. , 2009 ; Wu and Liang, 2009 ) .

Claver et Al ( 2006 ) and Holverson and Revaz ( 2006 ) found that The intangible and touchable factors have been recognized to be able to win good feedback or may ensue in ailment from the hotel invitee, nevertheless, the ability of the intangible and touchable factors to impact invitees experience are different from one to another. The survey of which factors or attributes that will increase the possibility of acquiring good feedback or factors that might ensue in ailments are of import for the direction of the hotel in order to heighten the client satisfaction and to guarantee client trueness to their hotel.

Furthermore, Cadotte and Turgeon ( 1988 ) classified service properties into four chief factors or classs which are: criticals ; satisfiers ; dissatisfies and neutrals. Critical properties are the properties that usually contribute high possibilities for good feedback of the public presentation and at the same clip supply high possibilities for ailments of hapless public presentation. Cadotte and Turgeon ( 1988 ) found that suites quietness in a hotel and the nutrient quality in a eating house are usually categorized in critical properties. The critical properties provide both an chance every bit good as a menace to the direction. If the directors are able to place the critical properties of their constitution, they could get the better of the menace and do it into an chance to execute better in the hereafter.

Furthermore, harmonizing to them, satisfiers are in a class whereby unusual God public presentation by the staff consequences in regards from the invitees while if the staff perform below the par public presentation, there will be no complain from the invitees. For illustration: hotel anterooms or the parts of nutrient in a eating house.

Silverman and Grover ( 1995 ) have categorized hotel service attributes utilizing the Importance-Performance Analysis ( IPA ) theory. The classification is harmonizing to necessary, desirable and inactive in order to depict the properties ‘ ability in act uponing the invitees ‘ perceptual experiences of quality that consequences in clients ‘ trueness. They mentioned that in order for the invitee to judge the hotel has a high quality service, necessary properties must be performed or functioned decently. Whereby, desirable properties put a base of quality perceptual experiences that the quality is good but, desirable properties might be given to cut down the quality perceptual experience of a invitee, nevertheless, the opinion is non to the point whereby the service quality is hapless.

Furthermore, by utilizing the same theory which is Importance-Performance Analysis ( IPA ) theory, a model has been found to place the degree of importance of sensed value of six hotels ‘ properties that affect concern and leisure invitees to take their hotel choice in Hong Kong. Recently, there was a research utilizing the same IPA model that identifies the behavior of luxury hotel client. The research worker ( Mohsing and Lockyer, 2010 ) found that luxury hotel clients are associated with value for money of the hotel which is considered as ‘high importance ‘ for the luxury hotel clients. In add-on, room trappingss or physical quality of the hotel and rapid response of the hotel ‘s reserve system play an of import function every bit good.

By uniting the thoughts from Cadotte and Turgeon ( 1988 ) and Silverman and Grover ( 1995 ) , Hartline et Al ( 2003 ) classified the public presentation of hotel service in hotels as necessary, desirable or impersonal. The study found that, in order to vouch the good perceptual experiences of quality in a hotel, the forepart desk staff public presentation is the necessary factor that affects guest experience. The research has besides found that the handiness of parking batch in the hotel and the housekeeping staff public presentation are considered as desirable factor, whereas the room service public presentation and concierge or known as bell adult male were considered as impersonal factor that affect client satisfaction.

Last but non least, plants of Ingram ( 1996 ) which were cited in Briggs et Al ( 2007 ) mentioned that there are 2 types of hotel direction: independent V concatenation hotel ) and assumed that high service quality are largely provided and emphasized by hotels which are portion of a concatenation hotel than an independent hotel. However, that premise was non correlated to the findings which were obtained utilizing questionnaire study informations. The findings showed that there is no important difference in client service evaluations of operational properties in a hotel ( for illustration: friendliness of staff, criterions practiced, individualized service and tangibles factors of hotel ) .

In decision, hotel properties of client satisfaction in hotels are related to intangibleness of service and tangibleness of physical factors ( Mohsin and Lockyer, 2010 ) . Harmonizing to Han et Al ( 2009 ) and Wu and Liang ( 2009 ) , the touchable elements are related with physical factors of the hotel, for illustration, design of hotel, staff visual aspect, cleanliness, etc while the intangible factors are related to client service. Both touchable and intangible facets of hotel are of import to win regards from the invitees or may ensue in complain from the invitees ( Claver et al. , 2006 ; Holverson and Revaz, 2006 ) . While there are many methods in finding the hotel attributes, it has been found that suites ‘ soundlessness and nutrient quality in eating house every bit good as hotel are categorized as critical factors that affect client satisfaction ( Cadotte and Turgeon, 1988 ) and besides front desk staff public presentation ( Hartline et al, 2003 ) .

Hotel ‘s Properties Preferred by Leisure and Business Hotel Guests

As most of hotel invitee are chiefly consists of leisure and concern invitees, there have been researches on the properties impacting leisure and concern invitees. Hotels by and large meet the demands of both concern and leisure invitees.

There were an efforts to understand the penchants of both leisure and concern invitees. Past survey by Clow et Al ( 1994 ) ; McCleary et Al ( 1993 ) ; Yavas and Babakus ( 2005 ) have shown that the most of import properties considered by concern invitees are cleanliness and location of the hotel while finding in which hotel they should remain. While in the same research, It has been found that security, personal interaction or service and pricing ( room rates ) are considered as major properties in leisure invitees hotel choice.

There was a research by Yavas and Babakus ( 2005 ) that examined whether the penchants of hotel properties are tantamount between concern and leisure invitees. Their research discovered that handiness of general comfortss is the highest precedence for both concern and leisure invitees. However, after general comfortss, the following properties are different between them. Business invitees ‘ following ranked properties were convenience, nucleus service, room comfortss and atmosphere consequently, whereby, the order of preferable properties of leisure invitees were core service, convenience, atmosphere and room comfortss which mean that there were no important in preferable properties by both type of invitees.

Another research has found that guest ‘ perceived monetary values and guest ‘ perceived quality of hotel ‘s public countries were of import in finding the evaluations and return purpose for both leisure and concern invitees. However, the findings showed that the impact or the consequence of sensed quality and monetary value of both type of invitees were different. The quality of hotel ‘s room was the most factor impacting return purpose and evaluations for concern invitees but it was non important in finding the behavior or return purpose of leisure invitees.

Customer Satisfaction in Service Industry

Determining client satisfaction is indispensable in order to bringing efficient and effectual service. The thought involves sensible and emotional procedures ( Churchill and Suprenant, 1996 ; Gundersen, Heigh and Olson, 1996 ) . Harmonizing to legion surveies, client satisfaction can be described as appraising post-consumption opinion by clients before buying a merchandise or service. Oliver ( 1980 ) defined client satisfaction as a consequence of a procedure that evaluate the pre-purchase service outlook of clients with the perceptual experiences of service public presentation while sing every bit good as after sing the service or ingestion.

There has been assortments of researches that were dedicated to look into the satisfaction determiners. Barsky ( 1995 ) categorized the client satisfaction as followed: outlooks, consumer penchants and consumer satisfaction. Furthermore, there was a determination that found atmosphere, handiness, location, flexibleness and communications between clients and service suppliers are the factors that may impact client satisfaction ( Choi and Chu, 2001 ) . Zeithaml and Blittner ( 2003 ) explained that the client satisfaction determiners are merchandises and service features, emotions of clients, success or failure of service properties, equity or equity perceptual experiences, household members and friends or other consumers.

In cordial reception industry, there have been several researches sing properties that clients seek in a hotel that are of import to their satisfaction in a hotel stay. Based on Atkinson ( 1988 ) ; Barsky and Labagh ( 1992 ) ; Choi and Chu ( 2001 ) surveies, it has been found that the most of import attributes a client seeks are staff service quality and friendliness, the location of the hotel, the cleanliness and comfort of room and security. He besides mentioned that those factors are the factors that affect client satisfaction in a hotel stay.

Even though researches have ne’er clarified the connexion between client satisfaction and service quality, but Churchill and Surprenant ( 1982 ) ; Oliver ( 1997 ) ; Oh ( 1999 ) ; Zeithaml and Bitner ( 2003 ) researches acknowledged that one of the cardinal triggers to heighten client satisfaction is service quality.

Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry ( 1988 ) argued that the spread between client satisfaction and client perceptual experiences of a certain service is the most common comparing that clients make to find whether they are satisfied or non. Therefore, harmonizing to Fornell ( 1992 ) , in order to accomplish client satisfaction in service industry or hotel, service suppliers should run into the point of outlook or surpass beyond the invitees ‘ outlook and execute an exceeding high quality service continuously as surveies of client satisfaction could impact the concern consequences of a company. Whether the client satisfaction is impacting the concern straight or indirectly, it is understood that, client satisfaction has an consequence to a concern ‘ future net incomes and client satisfaction is touted as one of the most of import indexs to better and derive more net incomes in the hereafter. Those statements from Fornell ( 1992 ) are strengthened by a research that found there is a important correlativity between client satisfaction and concern profitableness in a hotel ( Anderson et al. , 1994 ; Yeung et al. , 2002 ; Luo and Homburg, 2007 ) . Furthermore,

Soderlund ( 1998 ) ; Dimitriades ( 2006 ) ; Faullant et Al ( 2008 ) besides mentioned that client satisfaction may take to the spread of a good word of oral cavity, behavior every bit good as the client redemption purposes of the hotel ‘s service or installations.

Last but non least, the grounds why houses ‘ effort to obtain and keep client satisfaction is the fact that “ pulling new clients is much more expensive than maintaining the old 1s ” ( MarkoviA‡ et al, 2010 )

Factors Lending Customer Satisfaction Towards Guest Experience in Hotel Stay

Harmonizing to Clowe et Al ( 1994 ) , McCleary et Al ( 1993 ) and Yavas and Babakus ( 2005 ) , there are 6 factors impacting invitees ‘ experience in a hotel stay. The factors are client service, cleanliness, installations, monetary value, nutrient, and location which will be described one by one below.

( 1 ) Customer service

Due to the direct communicating or interaction between tourers and hotel staff, to keep the quality service of a hotel is really of import in order to make client satisfaction. The statement is strengthened by legion surveies that argued service attitude provided by the staff has a critical consequence in impacting client satisfaction ( Tas, 1983 ; Larsen and Bastiansen, 1991 ; Jaworski and Kohli, 1993 ; Heskett and Schlesinger, 1994 Bach and Milman, 1996 ; Mayo and Collegain, 1997 ;

McColl-Kennedy and White, 1997 ; Kriegl, 2000 ) . Furthermore, there is a research that found employee service attitude is critical in prosperity of hotel operation ( Guller, 1985 ) . It has besides been confirmed that there is a relationship that exists between client satisfaction and service quality and attitude that are provided by the employee ( Tornow and Wiley, 1991 ) .

From the probe of hotel properties impacting client satisfaction in cordial reception industry, researches have suggested the hotel to see or to keep the cleanliness of hotel, suites, service quality and staff behavior, location, security every bit good as the good will of the hotel trade name name or hotel concatenation, as those factors are considered of import for hotel invitees ( Cadotte and Turgeon,1988 ; Atkinson, 1988 ; Barsky and Labagh, 1992 ; Ananth et al. , 1992 ; Verespej, 1994 ; Worcester, 1999 ; Dube and Renaghan, 2000 ; Choi and Chu, 2001 )


I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out