I believe Caravaggio’s take on “The Conversion of Saint Paul” was controversial because some believe the transition was presented in a disrespectful mode. The sixteenth century was a clip of Religious Reformation and I think it would hold been less controversial if Saint Paul was presented in a more positive visible radiation ( non knocked down to the land ) . A batch of focal point seems to lie on the Equus caballus as that takes up rather a spot of the picture.
However. Saint Paul is besides highlighted as he lifts his custodies in congratulations and resignations to the Lord. Possibly such focal point is placed on the Equus caballus to stand for the power that knocked him down ( literally and figuratively talking ) . This picture is a perfect illustration of Baroque art because it contains the usage of chiaroscuro where there is a important contrast between the highlighted parts of the pictures and the dark shadows. I liked the “spotlight” mention noted in the Lecture as that merely seems to be the perfect manner to depict it. It’s about as if the creative person portrays a scene and highlights the chief character in the drama. That’s why I believe the Equus caballus must mean a message Caravaggio was seeking to portray as he is highlighted merely every bit much as Saint Paul was.
Saint Paul became a really prominenet Christian leader and harmonizing to the Testament he converted after meeting a resurrected The nazarene on his manner to Damascus. this would hold been for any Christian an highly Holy and godly minute. to hold Jesu’s visible radiation shined upon you and in this image nil Godhead is represented. to the contrary. this is represented in a really coarse manner in which Caravaggio used figures of the likes of doubtful beginning and exteme commonalty. Besides. the Equus caballus takes on most of the picture. and the whole scene is really upclose to the spectator therefore doing it really realistic and possibly unsuitable for the intended location which was the Cerasi chapel in Santa del Popolo.
This picture is a perfect illustration of the Baroque manner due to its extremely charged emotional and dramatic undertone every bit good as radical and controversial in which the usage of overdone gesture. idiosyncrasy. every bit good as luxuriant scenes. I believe that the Caravaggio’s picture. Conversion of St. Paul. illustrates person coming to their senses and seeing the truth when they realize what must be done. From a spiritual facet. when I look at this picture and see Saint Paul lying on the land with his custodies raised and eyes closed I get the feeling that he is idolizing or thanking God for demoing him the truth or possibly he had a vision of God. The bright colourss. or reflecting visible radiation. that is over Paul is besides symbolic of seeing “the truth” . The adult male standing in the background could perchance stand for immorality and the Equus caballus is stepping in forepart of him to protect Saint Paul. Besides. it shows that the horse’s pess portray him as vulnerable.
The Conversion of St. Paul caused contention is the 1600’s because it was really realistic and it was seen as an reading of the event of Paul’s transition that was really of import to the Christian community. The church was upset because Caravaggio made the Equus caballus occupy the bulk of the infinite and the buttocks was a chief focal point. They saw this as disrespectful and felt that Caravaggio saw Paul as unimportant.
Caravaggio’s work represents Baroque manner. He was considered the most of import Baroque painter in Italy. This picture is exciting. supernatural. dramatic. excessively expressive and theatrical. The usage of visible radiation. the mixture of dark and bright colourss. Paul’s facial look. and the pragmatism besides give it a churrigueresque touch. I believe this image was so controversial in 1600’s because during that clip faith was large and this image doesn’t appear to be a good representation of the narrative behind it at least non in that epoch. The people believed that Paul was depicted as a cipher lying impotently on his dorsum on the land.
The biggest part/ chief focal point in the image was the Equus caballuss behind which automatically took the focal point from Paul and was seen as a mark of discourtesy. It likely was seen as if the Caravaggio was doing visible radiation of the transition as if it was a gag although it wasn’t intended to look that manner. I don’t think they truly knew how to construe the image. The features seen in the image make it a perfect illustration of churrigueresque art. Baroque art is dramatic. excessively expressive and theatrical all of which you see in the picture. Another feature is the usage of “chiaroscuro”- the strong contrast between light and shadowing as you see most of the Equus caballus and Paul in the visible radiation and the background shadowed out. The image was done to demo pragmatism and pragmatism is besides a feature of Baroque as the image looks like a existent scene in which the soldier fell off his Equus caballus. That type of manner was used to give the viewer the ability to associate more to the narrative and the characters in which the image does at least for me being able to visualise the narrative behind it.
The Conversion of Saint Paul was contraversal during the 1600’s. When it wa shown they found the picture to picture Saint Paul as non of import and to be common. Besides it was non liked that he had the Equus caballus be the chief focal point. To me when I look at his picture I seeSaint Paul on the land with Hs weaponries up to god. with Gods visible radiation hining onhim. Besides his Equus caballus could be protecting him from the immorality in the backround. Caravaggio was seeking to demo us a more realistic facet of what Saint Paul traveling through. With Baroque the picture were more realistic. non fabulous. This picture shows the contrast of visible radiation and darkness. It is good word picture of Baroque by holding people be able to associate better to the narrative being told.
Caravaggio’s oil painted rendering of the Conversion of Saint Paul is the prototype of Baroque Art. This new artistic motion of the 1600’s was founded by Caravaggio. who has been renowned as the most of import Baroque painter in Italy. The manner is exemplified in this peculiar piece through its realistic reading of the narrative of Saint Paul which is rendered in a dramatic. theatrical. expressive mode and utilizes strong contrast between light and dark in the chiaroscuro technique.
Caravaggio’s commissioned rendering was polemically accepted by the members of the Cerasi chapel as his symbolic reading of the epiphany of the Jewish soldier was depicted with a focal point on the human facet of the instant realisation as opposed to the Godhead and supernatural accent most likely expected by the church. The portraiture of Saint Paul on his dorsum with his weaponries extended towards the sky in the form of a rood after holding seemingly fallen from his Equus caballus is presented in a compositional signifier that draws viewer accent to the back terminal of the Equus caballus. and a common adult male on his dorsum. This was interpreted by the commissioners as vulgar and disrespectful as they did non grok Caravaggio’s traveling and emotional portraiture of the powerful minute of realisation.