Many athletes in the past and present have been bringing in attendance and money to the university. Patrick Ewing former NAB Star went to college in Georgetown and he brought in Profit, I’m pretty sure that this was back when Ewing played back in the ‘ass that should be over $1 7,000,000 now. A lot of these college athletes such as Andrew Luck, Anthony Davis, Jarred Slinger, Robert Griffin Ill bring in tons of money for their university, people want to see these young college athletes play.
Most of these athletes on big time teams put on amazing performances and bring the university millions of Lars, these athletes get paid a quarter of a million dollars at the most. The big time colleges now such as Kansas, Kentucky, Baylor, Duke, Michigan SST all basketball, and Alabama, ILLS for football grab millions of dollars each year. The athletes for those teams such as Austin Rivers, Anthony Davis, Thomas Robinson, Jeremy Lamb, Andrew Luck, and many more get scholarships worth $250,000 at the most.
Another reason people believe that college athletes should be paid is because some athletes are not getting paid from what others are benefiting from. It is obvious that big companies benefit from unpaid athletes. “The video game business is a multi-billion dollar industry that uses college athletes in games without giving them names or credits” (Cassavas, Dan). That is a lot of money these companies are making, these athletes are not even getting recognized, and these athletes don’t get a dime.
Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot
Athletes should be paid for this; the athletes don’t get paid for all the money they bring to all these people. The Big Time Industries, The Universities, and all the other places that benefit from these athletes. College athletes are under looked by all these people and do not get what they deserve. These athletes deserve pay for all the money they bring in. Athletes do not even get a penny from these companies who make millions or even billions of dollars from their popularity. These Athletes names are known by millions across the U.
S. They buy these athletes gears with their name yet these athletes do not get pay. (Dry. Dave) “Show them the money! ” That’s what some officials are saying on behalf of college athletes. They say students who play sports for their schools should receive salaries. Top athletes deserve paychecks because many of them practice full time, the officials argue. The students also make money for their schools when people buy tickets to their games. The players should receive some Of that cash, supporters reason. Weekly Reader News Edition 4-6) Is playing big-time college sports an extracurricular activity or a job? Two law professors at Michigan State University, Robert and Amy McCormick, think it is definitely a job for football and basketball players on athletic scholarships at Division schools. The married couple has added a new dimension to the long debate over paying athletes by arguing they are “employees” under federal labor laws and entitled to form unions and negotiate wages, hours ND working conditions.
The NCAA, in accordance with courts that have addressed the issue, believes that student-athletes are not employees, under the law, and that they should not be treated as employees either by the law or by the schools they attend. Moreover, taxing authorities do not consider the benefits student athletes receive to be taxable compensation. In an article in the Washington Law Review, the McCormick analyze whether Division I football and basketball players are really employees under common law and the National Labor Relations Board’s 2004 decision that graduate assistants t Brown University were students, not employees.
Common law has three tests: (1) the right of others to control a person’s activities; (2) whether that person is compensated; and (3) if that person is economically dependent on that compensation. The law professors find that college athletes meet all three because a coach has much control over what they do, an athletic scholarship amounts to compensation and players depend on those funds for food and shelter as well as schooling. In their analysis of the Brown University decision, the McCormick conclude the status of athletes differs from radiate assistants’.
The professors say athletes are not primarily engaged in learning, play sports unrelated to their course Of study and fall under the supervision of coaches rather than faculty members. The McCormick dispute the Null’s finding on the fourth test, which has to do with compensation. In their judgment, young men playing major football and basketball are not there primarily for an education. They’re primarily there to win football games and basketball games and perform well. (Cox, Mathews) Division One college football and basketball are no longer games.
They are huge billion dollar entertainment businesses built on the backs and dreams of athletically gifted college students. The Ohio State University and the university of Miami are among the latest to become embroiled in controversies over impermissible benefits to players. When Men’s football and basketball generate $775 million annually in television revenues the amateurism ideal that the NCAA purports to promote no longer exists. College conference and school authorities are quick to discipline and disqualify student athletes for receiving improper benefits.
But theres toting proper about athletic scholarships when only fifty percent of the players graduate. Ensure that student athletes have collective bargaining rights and representation that begins during the recruiting process. Ensure that student athletes with scholarships who are injured are able to retain their scholarships and recover Out of pocket medical expenses and related costs they and their families receive. Student athletes should be able to negotiate payment terms over and above the value of their athletic scholarships with colleges. (Renee Ferguson) The argument has two main sides.
The first would be to pay the college athletes due to the amount of work that sports require. College-athletes put in nearly the same amount of time to their sports that professionals do and make no money, while professionals make millions. Another main argument for giving a stipend to players is the fact that without them, the NCAA would not be able to make the multi-million dollar television contracts that they do. Therefore, people argue that the players help generate revenue and should be paid accordingly. College athletes are so invested in their sports that it’s basically a job for them.
