Compare the ways in which Soyinka in Death and a King’s Horseman and Miller in All My Sons present Elesin and Keller? How far would you hold that the personal calamity of each protagonist’s decease is less of import than the decease of their boies? Soyinka and Miller shape the supporters by their presentations of their voice utilizing different linguistic communication and usage of puting cultural context which presents their different duties and responsibilities exposing their character. The different presentations of the characters find how the audience connect with the supporters. Elesin and Keller’s deceases are climatic points in the drama. with their son’s deceases besides being polar ; moving as accelerators for the protagonist’s decease which cause the protagonist’s to admit their fatal defects. The different intents of the protagonist’s self-destructions. made evident besides by the protagonist’s presented characters. find whether the calamity of their decease is more of import than the decease of their boies.

The scene and cultural context of each of the dramas a profound function in determining the characters as the differing cultural context affects the character’s responsibilities and duties which shape their presentations as characters. Though set in the same clip periods. the civilizations differ between dramas. Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman opens in “Oyo. an ancient Yoruba metropolis in Nigeria. 1944” . during British colonialism whereas All My Sons by Miller is set in the “outskirts of an American town” merely after the war in the late 1940’s after universe war two. Soyinka and Miller’s debuts of the civilization and the scene at the beginning of the dramas expose the protagonist’s single characters. The “secluded atmosphere” on the “outskirts of an American town” in which All My Sons opens Acts of the Apostless as a dramatic device to demo Keller’s devotedness to his household by showing him as sectioned off from wider society. Additionally. the “closely planted poplars” which seclude the country act as a dramatic device to stand for Keller’s slightly narrow minded rules and set values.

Soyinka’s portraiture of the civilization and scene besides presents Elesin’s character and nature. Soyinka invites the audience to the rich Yoruban civilization through Elesin’s voice ; “a adult male of tremendous vitality” who exposes the beauty of the scene to the audience. therefore uncovering his lecherousness for earthly pleasances. “The odor of anil on their fabric. this is the air I wish to breath” portrays Elesin’s yearn for life. The usage of redolent description of the scene and civilization creates a image of Elesin’s vivacious character. The author’s usage of linguistic communication. which creates the character’s voice. presents the supporters otherwise and shapes the audience’s reactions and feelings towards them in each drama. Miller’s usage of confused linguistic communication such as “what’s goin” . to make Keller’s voice. presents him as an un-educated simple adult male. Though his incoherent linguistic communication means the audience isn’t enticed or fascinated by him. it presents him as an ordinary character. leting the audience to link with him on a personal degree. The fact the audience is able to link with Keller personally. because of his down to earth nature. means the audience are less sympathetic of his fatal defect as Miller’s presentation of him causes the audience to be un-expectant of his down autumn.

“Back in my twenty-four hours you were either a physician or a lawyer” unmaskings Keller’s myopic position of the universe and strong fond regard to his set values. Conversely. Soyinka’s usage of complex linguistic communication to make Elesin’s voice fascinates and captivates the audience. giving him high position as a character. Soyinka presents Elesin as an ebullient character fascinated by earthly pleasances. “I go a sovereign whose castle is built with tenderness and beauty” . The fluxing beat of his voice and the usage of positive adjectives expose his passion for life ; his fatal defect as a character. Elesin speaks poetically in conundrums such as “when the Equus caballus sniffs the stable does he non strive at the bridle? ” showing him as articulate and expressive. He besides uses metaphors to show his thoughts such as “you’re like a covetous wife” when speaking to the Praise-Singer. This usage of conundrums and metaphors makes him sometimes hard to understand showing the thought he hides his fatal defect by utilizing his linguistic communication to deflect the congratulations vocalist from admiting his love for life which distracts him from his cultural responsibility.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

For illustration when the congratulations vocalist accuses Elesin of burying “a long faithful female parent of his children” mentioning to his duties to his civilization. Elesin replies poetically stating “when the Equus caballus snuffs at the stable does he non strive at the bridle? ” . However. his superior place makes it hard for the audience to link with him on a personal degree. This foreshadows his ruin as a character as he subsequently abandons his duties to his civilization by non perpetrating to his responsibility of self-destruction. Because his fatal defects are foreshadowed. when his ruin is finally exposed it is expected by the audience therefore they feel sympathy for him and his decease is seen as an act of salvation.

Both All My Sons and Death and a King’s equestrian are structured with the climatic parts of the drama at the terminal and usage prefiguration techniques throughout the dramas to construct up the tenseness and flood tide. In Death of a King’s Horseman Soyinka portrays Elesin’s fatal defect ; his desire for earthly pleasances which distracts him from the duty of decease ; to bode his ruin as a character. Soyinka’s usage of linguistic communication unmaskings Soyinka’s desire for mortal pleasances. “This market is my roost” foreshadows his inability to give his be devotedness for life for the benefit for the people in his civilization. Similarly. Miller uses boding techniques to predict the disclosure of Keller’s errors.

The broken tree which is a memorial for Larry acts as a dramatic device which foreshadows the terminal of Keller’s family’s ignorance to his error. The female parent besides foreshadows this by The different intents within the narration of the protagonist’s decease affect their differing importance’s compared to the decease of their son’s which acts as a accelerator The point at which the male parents acknowledge their boies decease is the polar point at which the protagonist’s accept their fatal defects. In Death and a King’s Horseman. because the decease of Elesin is presented as an act of salvation. in my sentiment the calamity of his decease is more of import than the decease of his boy When Keller’s error of killing Larry is discovered he responds defensively to protect himself. “The infinitesimal there’s problem you [ mother ] run out of strength” suggests Keller efforts to direct the incrimination on to person else and deny his errors.

The fact his decease takes topographic point as a consequence of his household eschewing him suggests his purposes for his self-destruction are selfish. to protect himself from sadness as his household is the lone thing he values in life. This causes the audience to see his decease as a fearful act instead than an act of salvation from his errors. In my sentiment this makes his self-destruction less of import than the decease of his boy within the drama which is the polar point of exposing Keller’s mistakes as a character. On the contrary. Elesin’s knowing decease is presented as an act of salvation. It is clear Elesin kills himself for the benefit of his civilization as “he has a responsibility to perform” .

The presentation of his cultural responsibilities at the beginning of the drama The minute at which he kills himself is more of import than the decease of his boy as it is the polar point in the novel where his errors and defects are redeemed by demoing his trueness to his civilization. Therefore. although Keller’s suicide seems less of import than the decease of his boy as his self-destruction is simply a selfish act to protect him. Elesin’s knowing decease is an act of salvation. doing it every bit of import as the decease of his boy.


I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out