An enterpriser must be skilled in bring forthing new thoughts and presenting them to the market, but a large portion of invention besides is the ability to stabilise procedures and market conditions in order to let clients and clients to purchase the merchandises or services over a sustained period of clip ( Stokes and Wilson, 2010 ) . So fundamentally, the kernel of invention is the successful development of a new thought. But before working the thought, an enterpriser must possess the ability to acknowledge the right chances. Entrepreneurial chance acknowledgment is the ability to place ‘situations in which new goods, services, natural stuffs, markets and forming methods can be introduced through the formation of new agencies, ends, or means-ends relationships ‘ ( Eckhardt and Shane, 2003: 336 ) . In one of the most of import documents to day of the month on this subject, Ardichvili et Al. ( 2003: 106 ) argue that ‘identifying and choosing the right chances for new concerns are among the most of import abilities of a successful enterpriser ‘ .

In the entrepreneurship literature the impression of entrepreneurial capablenesss – ‘the ability to place a new chance and develop the resource base needed to prosecute the chance ‘ ( Arthurs and Busenitz, 2006: 199 ) – has become an progressively of import construct that has been used to explicate the resources and accomplishments required for effectual entrepreneurial activity ( see, for illustration, Alvarez and Busenitz, 2001 ; Chell and Allman, 2003 ) .

Dataset 8: Type of entrepreneurship ( chance or necessity )

As aforementioned, entrepreneurship can be either chance driven or necessity driven. Surveies have found that, in general, persons with lower chance costs are more likely to establish houses ( Amit et al. , 1995 ) . In other words, entrepreneurship can besides be considered as a effect of lower chance costs.

It can be observed that restraints and chances differ depending on the type of entrepreneurship. As Van Stel et Al. ( 2007:173 ) points out, a high regulative load influences necessity entrepreneurship and chance entrepreneurship otherwise. Van Stel et Al. goes farther by claiming that possible necessity enterprisers normally possess less wealth ; regulative costs can upset their fiscal position and discourage them from entrepreneurship. On the other manus, possible chance enterprisers usually possess more wealth ; they have more options ( notably, to go on being a pay earner ) , which in bend make them sensitive to start-up costs ( Ho and Wong, 2007 ) . In contrast, possible high-impact enterprisers who expect big additions are less likely to be deterred by a regulative load, granted that the expected addition is high plenty ( Ho and Wong, 2007 ) .

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
Writers Experience
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
Writers Experience
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
Writers Experience
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

There are four chief grounds that emphasize the importance to do a differentiation between chance and necessity driven enterprisers. First, necessity and chance enterprisers appear to differ in footings of their socio-economic features, such as the degree of instruction, relevant experience and age ( Reynolds et al. , 2001 ; Amit and Muller, 1995 ; Block and Wagner, 2007 ; Wagner, 2005 ; Giacomin et al. , 2007 ) .

Second, the grounds why enterprisers decide to go freelance influence the ways how they conduct and manage their concern, which in bend affects their concern public presentation. For illustration, enterprisers who start a concern because they want to gain more money than in wage-employment can be expected to act otherwise than persons who create a new venture to be better able to unite work and family duties ( Hessels et al. , 2008 ) . Besides, necessity-driven enterprisers seem to be less satisfied than opportunity-driven enterprisers ( Block and Wagner, 2007 ; Galbraith and Latham, 1996 ; Block and Koellinger, 2009 ; Kautonen and Palmroos, 2009 ) .

Third, in their survey of the interplay between the concern rhythm and the entrepreneurship rhythm Koellinger and Thurik ( 2009 ) show that, when a favoritism is made between the start-up motivations, chance entrepreneurship leads the rhythm by two old ages, while necessity entrepreneurship leads the rhythm by merely one twelvemonth.

The 4th statement comes from the observation that determiners of ( nascent ) chance and necessity entrepreneurship differ ( Block and Wagner, 2007 ; Wagner, 2005 ; Morales- Gualdron and Roig, 2005 ) . This means that policies that are intended to excite entrepreneurship may hold different effects for necessity-driven entrepreneurship and opportunity-driven entrepreneurship. For illustration, exciting the unemployed to get down a concern will profit necessity and non chance enterprisers ( Bergmann and Sternberg, 2007 ) .

Finally, it should be noted that there is no rigorous division between these two types of entrepreneurship. As Block and Sandner ( 2009 ) point out, people are non ever a complete chance enterpriser, merely driven by the alone concern chances on the market, or a complete necessity enterpriser.

Market conditions:

Another cardinal facet in making an entrepreneurial environment is related to the market conditions. Which chances are created by the current market conditions? As Writings ( 1980 ) put it, as the substructure develops and as the entrepreneurial system grows, the system will boom merely if the environment is contributing for entrepreneurial activity and new venture creative activity. Whether a market is attractive for an enterpriser depends on a figure of factors, such as the size and growing rate of the market, the figure of rivals, and the strength of the competition. Is at that place long-run growing potency for their products/services, are at that place any market limitations, how are the labour Torahs constructed, all of these and many more inquiries are posed by enterprisers who are sing to present a new merchandise or service into a market.

Dataset 9: Puting up a new concern or pickings over an bing one

This dataset investigates whether an enterpriser prefers taking over an bing company or instead starts a new concern. Often it is seen that enterprisers choose to take over an bing company when it concerns a household concern. In general it is unusual for kids who have entrepreneurial parents to go wageworkers. Numerous surveies have highlighted that persons whose parents are freelance are more likely than others to set-up their ain concerns, for illustration because they are more inclined to see the creative activity of a new endeavor as a feasible calling option ( Shapero and Sokol, 1982 ) .

In the United States, 61,2 % of the respondents chose to put up a new concern instead than taking over an bing one. 30,4 % chose taking an bing one over puting up a new concern. The penchant of get downing a new concern can be due to the costs that are involved with concern start-up processs. As the graph below indicates, the start-up costs are significantly lower in the United States compared to South Korea and the remainder of the universe.

Cost of concern start-up processs ( % of GNI per capita )

In South Korea, 43,3 % of the respondents chose to put up a new concern instead than taking over an bing one. Yet over tierce of the respondents ( 34 % ) chose taking over an bing one over puting up a new concern. Blanchflower and Oswald ( 1998 ) find that the reception of an heritage seems to increase an person ‘s chance of being selfemployed, and Fairlie and Robb ( 2004 ) discourse how anterior work experience in a family-owned concern has positive effects on concern results. Wholly, as mentioned earlier, taking over an bing one is most likely because it concerns a household owned concern.

3 ) What does it connote for entrepreneurship in both states and how make these variables really postpone?

After discoursing the indexs of entrepreneurial activity in the old chapters, the inquiry now arises: how precisely do these determiners of entrepreneurial activity interact with each other? To look into on this inquiry, an empirical analysis is done to research to what extent a choice of factors have an consequence on the pick of position ( freelance or employee ) .

1. A function theoretical account

2. Education

3. Previous experience: Experience in get downing a concern

4. Barriers: Trouble of happening fiscal support

5. Fear of failure

The relevant variables will be farther explained in the subdivision below where the observations within the theoretical account will be discussed. In entire 26168 respondents from 35 states have been interviewed on these subjects. These indexs have been chosen to make a general representation of a state ‘s sentiment towards entrepreneurship during their procedure of taking stairss to going freelance.

We will analyze the relationship between the dependant variable ‘choice of position ‘ on the LHS and the independent variables ‘role theoretical account ‘ , ‘education ‘ , ‘experience in get downing a concern ‘ , ‘difficulty of happening fiscal support, and ‘fear of failure ‘ on the RHS. All these variables are expected to impact the person ‘s likeliness to go freelance. The outlooks are that as the figure of the these standards that are met additions, the higher the chance of going an enterpriser will go.



Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients



Std. Mistake



( Constant )




Importance function theoretical account





Importance instruction










Importance fiscal support





Fear of failure





a. Dependent Variable: freelance

Significance degree = 0.10

Based on the theoretical account it is significantly true that function theoretical account, experience, and fiscal support affect the pick for self-employment.

Remarkable observations from the theoretical account:

Merely the variables that have a important consequence on the pick of position are being discussed, viz. function theoretical account, experience and fiscal support.

Role theoretical account:

The theoretical account shows as expected that a function theoretical account tends to be significantly more of import for South Korea than for the United States. The cultural differences between these two states can be a possible account for this phenomenon. The United States has a dominantly individualistic civilization where function theoretical accounts serve as a mere beginning of inspiration, whereas South Korea shows to hold a less self-interested civilization where function theoretical accounts are largely associated with prestigiousness and high position. Besides, when a household member is already an enterpriser, this increases the likeliness of other members of the household to go entrepreneurial as good. Blanchflower and Oswald ( 1998 ) find that the reception of an heritage seems to increase an person ‘s chance of being selfemployed, Therefore, South Korea is more likely to value an entrepreneurial function theoretical account than the United States is.


The theoretical account shows that experience in get downing up a concern has a important consequence on the pick of position. As Bosma, new wave Praag, Thurik and de Wit ( 2004 ) explain, the industry experience of the laminitis increases house endurance, house net incomes and steadfast employment. Gimeno, Folta, Cooper and Woo ( 1997 ) besides find that experience in related concerns has a positive consequence on public presentation, and has no consequence on the likeliness of go outing entrepreneurship conditional on public presentation. There is besides consistent grounds that old experience in self-employment additions the likeliness of endurance in new concern ventures ( Holmes and Schmitz, 1996 ; Quadrini, 1999 ; Taylor, 1999 ) .

The United States have a higher per centum of people holding experience with get downing up a concern. As Ellsworth ( 1985 ) explains, U.S. houses ‘ activities have been mostly the consequence of entrepreneurial attempts, unencumbered by authorities engagement but limited by an advanced market system. Companies have hence, within the bounds of the capital establishments, been free to follow market demand and to measure the virtues of chances ( e.g. acquisitions ) based on their attraction ( e.g. ) of industry ) and returns or profitableness ( i.e. ROI, stock monetary value, discounted hard currency flow, projected demand ) .

South Korea has a somewhat lower per centum of people who have experience with get downing a concern than the United States. This lower per centum can be explained because of the chaebol. As mentioned earlier, the Economist ( May, 2011 ) points out, “ the Korean economic system is dominated by the chaebol, immense pudding stones with tentacles in every fret. Parents of bright immature Koreans typically maneuver them into steady callings in the chaebol, the authorities or the professions. ” Therefore, it is less likely in South Korea to hold experience in get downing a concern.

Fiscal support:

The theoretical account shows that it becomes more hard to get down one ‘s concern due to miss of fiscal support, is significantly true. The United States has a high per centum of respondents holding on this affair. As the FCCISL ( 2010 ) points out, “ studies have revealed that SMEs have trouble in borrowing from formal channels of recognition in position of their inability to show bankable proposals due to limited cognition and accomplishments in fiscal direction and operational administration. Many fiscal suppliers consider SME funding as a bad activity that generates high dealing costs and/or low returns on investing. ” This could be a possible account that shows that when there is a deficiency of fiscal support, it can go more hard to get down a concern in the United States.

In South Korea we see a much lower understanding on this affair. In South Korea it is the instance that the authorities ‘s attempts to set up sound economic planning, and the private concern sector ‘s response to strategic industrial enterprises to excite involvement in attractive industries, led to houses diversifying into specific industries to have discriminatory allocation of foreign assistance and grants, discriminatory loans and funding, and revenue enhancement freedoms or tax write-offs ( Chung and Lee, 1989 ; Yoo and Lee, 1987 ) . South Korea besides differs from the United States in the facet that they have a national recognition warrant system. As Jung ( 2002 ) points out, possibly the most of import is the recognition warrant system, by which SMEs acquire recognition warrants from government-owned fiscal establishments in order to obtain bank loans. This window chance has been a manner of deriving entree to capital for many companies in preferable industries.


This paper examined how entrepreneurial activity can be measured and what its indexs are. From the first portion it can be concluded that both the United States and South Korea have a common penchant for being freelance. Why some chose for self-employment and why others chose for being employed were based on the facets such as avoiding high pay revenue enhancements, labour contracts, the demand for accomplishment and venue of control.

The 2nd portion contains how entrepreneurs perceive the six determiners of entrepreneurial activity and the explanatory grounds why they differ in nature in South Korea compared to the United States. These six determiners are regulative model, civilization, entree to finance, entrepreneurial capablenesss, and market conditions. Nine OECD-Eurostat EIP datasets have besides been analyzed to find differences, similarities and anomalousnesss in entrepreneurial activity. The consequences were that these root from cultural, national and economic evidences. The most of import findings from the first two chapters together were:

– The presence of chaebol in South Korea

– The individualistic outlook and high-risk fetching civilization in the United States

– The strong influences of South Korea ‘s Confucian political orientation

In the 3rd portion a arrested development theoretical account was created to look into the consequence of five selected factors ( function theoretical account, instruction, fiscal support, old experience, fright of failure ) on a individual ‘s pick of position: going freelance or being an employee. The findings suggested that merely a function theoretical account, old experience, and fiscal support have a important consequence on the pick of position. To sum up these findings:

– A function theoretical account is of much stronger importance in South Korea

– The higher degree of experience in get downing a concern is of much stronger importance in the United States

– Due to a deficiency of fiscal support, it becomes significantly more hard to get down a concern in the United States


I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out