Would an AY really be able to make a deep emotional connection with a being who thinks lions of times more slowly than it does, and who lives such a radically different existence from its unbounded, silicon and fiber-optic universe? Think Of it this way: Could you really fall in love with an Operating System? Artificial Intelligence (AY) is still a distant dream but the experts are already pondering its potential impact on humanity.
Even AY far less sophisticated than Cantata’s could engender some serious issues, says Kate Darling, an intellectual property researcher at Mitt’s Media Lab who is also on the forefront of robot-ethics. One-sided love affairs are more likely, at first. A man of Tomboys type might be enthralled by Sir 2. 0 but shell only ever give polite quips and Google Search results in return. “We’re going to be able to fall in love with AY long before it is able to fall in love with us,” Darling says. Issue 1: How Close Are We To Artificial Intelligence? The movie “Her” is set in a safely near future.
It was just hazy and weird enough to seem different, yet not outside a present-day viewers lifespan. And likewise, most predictions by experts and amateurs alike place the advent of truly self-aware artificial intelligence in the realm of “just around the ornery,” according to Stuart Armstrong, an Oxford University philosopher who works at the Future of Humanity Institute. Armstrong has been analyzing hundreds of AY predictions as he posted an initial write-up of his findings, and has found little difference between timeliness hazarded by experts and non-experts.
As he have said, “the most common prediction is 15 to 20 years from when the prediction is being made” One problem in trying to pin down a timeline for the development of AY is that the goalposts for what constitutes true “intelligence” keep moving. It’s harder ND harder to identify the features that you could call uniquely human. Behaviors that we thought could only be accomplished by humanity turn out to be within the reach of computers, and start to look less like intelligence and more like database processing. No one knows what the problem is, so we have no clear idea how to solve it. You’re talking about an entity that has never existed in human history,” Armstrong says. “If you told people 10 or 15 years ago that we’d have a computer that could win on ‘Jeopardy,’ they’d say that AY is solved and it’s not. ” Issue 2: No Need to Procreate We humans prize our humanity, and we love to project it onto everything from puppies to household appliances. “Even those of us who work with robots every day and know they re not real tend to anthropomorphism them,” Darling says. We’ll think that they’re cute, give them a gender, or ascribe intent and states of mind. Its something we like to do. ” But there’s little reason to expect that true AY would bear any resemblance to a human personality. Most AY in fiction from “2001: A Space Oddity'”s HAL 9000 to any number of B-movie robots are made by humans, for humans. Every single AY that’s ever been in any movie is a human,” Armstrong says. “The evil ones are generally emotionally repressed humans, while the good ones are generally affectionate saints.
All of these fall within the very narrow bounds of humanity. ” The reality of AY might be something wholly alien. A bodiless program like Samaritan might have a fairly different notion of her individuality, since she can be copied from one device to another, or connect with other operating systems online. How could one maintain a cohesive whole? “They may have no sense of self-preservation,” Armstrong says. They might see that they should probably stay alive to accomplish their goals, but beyond that they may be perfectly willing to overwrite themselves. So what form might love take in an entity with no sense of self, and no sense of mortality plus no need to procreate. Issue 3: Technology Danger The risks of AY love in the real world may go beyond heartbreak. Darling points out that some thinkers, like MIT colleague Sherry Turtle, worry that people may start preferring relationships with AY to relationships with people. “l, personally, am more concerned with this technology falling into the wrong ands,” says Darling and she means hands of both of the corporate and government kind.
A super-intelligent operating system in everyone’s ear carries equal possibilities for surveillance and advertising. “If you can get a child to become friends with a robotic toy, that toy could start manipulating that child,” Darling says. “Or what if Samaritan is telling [Thee] all the time that she loves Coca-Cola? ” Entrusting AY with power over our lives could also turn into a classic “monkey’s paw’ scenario. Like a fairy tale genie, an AY personal assistant may end up technically granting your wish or fixing your life, but in a way that sakes you wish they hadn’t bothered.