This literature reappraisal provides a synthesis of research from salary studies, academic diaries, and trade publications on the subject of compensation in the non-profit sector – in peculiar, executive compensation. The reappraisal follows research with a focal point on tendencies of executive compensation, stakeholder outlooks, factors of compensation, increased populace examination, organisational civilization by industry and administration and the IRS.

There is grounds that inordinate executive compensation in the non-profit-making sector attracts attending and examination, and even stronger grounds that a non-profit-making CEOs compensation bundle is non closely related to public presentation. The grounds indicates that there is a demand for construction in the not-for-profit sector, and if non self-regulated, the non-profit-making universe as we know it may shortly be capable to authorities ordinance.

The literature reappraisal concludes by offering advice on finding the rightness of a non-profit-making executive ‘s wage. It besides contains personal positions sing not-for-profits that are sing increasing executive compensation.


Research sing executive compensation can be easy obtained because there has been a great trade of clip and survey devoted to the subject. However, most research has been conducted refering for-profit organisations – chiefly publicly traded companies. There has been small research devoted to nonprofit organisations and their compensation strategies. So, what is sensible compensation for a non-profit CEO? The subject of compensation for the CEOs of not-for-profits has ever been one of contention that receives a great trade of attending. There are many who believe that executive wage must be as competitory in the non-profit-making sector as the for-profit sector in order to pull and retain great endowment. However, there are many other people who will reason that executive wages that are highly high are downright violative. Nonprofits behavior concern in chase of a societal mission to supply a public benefit. They rely to a great extent on contributions and even public support, and because executive compensation is public information, when inordinate it can sabotage public assurance and destruct trust – something else a non-profit-making relies upon. The undermentioned reappraisal will concentrate on tendencies of executive compensation, stakeholder outlooks, factors of compensation, increased populace examination, organisational civilization by industry and administration and the IRS.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Tendencies of Executive Compensation

“ The executive compensation construction of non-profit-making CEOs has been by and large overlooked. What is the incentive construction of these CEOs and how does it impact on executive public presentation? ( Giroux & A ; Wilson ) ” Understanding an organisation ‘s scheme to counterbalance an executive is necessary to support its intent, mission and ends. The best manner to pull off just compensation is with a clear policy in topographic point. Evidence shows that some executives are acquiring “ ace ” wage for a “ craftsman ‘s ” work. In the undermentioned Research… take a expression at the Survey… There is significant grounds that illustrates tendencies of wage additions mostly turning. Furthermore, assorted studies make outlooks about compensation really complicated. It is expected that wage additions will discontinue traveling frontward due to shriveling parts caused by a weak economic system.

Analyzing non-profit-making executive compensation is extremely of import for several grounds. “ First, the relationship of the regulating board to the CEO is extremely political. Second, the regulating board can honor CEOs liberally or end them about instantly. Third, the function of the CEO and the relationship to the board can ensue in black effects under some fortunes, normally because of hapless corporate administration patterns ( Giroux & A ; Wilson ) . ”

Stakeholder Expectations

Some people might show concern that CEOs are paid excessively much for the work they perform. Careful consideration of stakeholder outlooks should be an of import factor when doing necessary organisational determinations. This will non merely assist the decision-makers to come to an appropriate determination, but to boot it helps to reenforce the organisation ‘s intent, mission, and values to the people involved in the organisation. Stakeholders of not-for-profits include, but are non limited to, employees, voluntaries, board members, givers and helpers, the environing community, donees, and in some instances even clients.

Many givers would hold that the CEO taking their favourite non-profit-making organisation does non merit a six figure wage. The disclosures of highly high wages can decrease donor assurance and even more damaging, it can do increased public incredulity. This is why it is necessary for board members to pay really close attending when finding a CEOs wage addition, and entire overall compensation. Nonprofit boards need to hold a principle to warrant their determinations, satisfy any inquiries from stakeholders, and most of import maintain their staff happy. Entire compensation of the top 5 highest paid officers in any not-for-profit is recorded each twelvemonth when it is filed with the IRS Form 990 – an informational revenue enhancement signifier. The Form 990 is a public papers that is made available to the populace, whenever requested, including the media. It is for this ground that a CEO ‘s wage can non be regarded as confidential.

Board members need to be cognizant of deductions of this public information, peculiarly because the media is merely excessively delighted to describe unreasonably big compensation bundles of both private foundations ‘ and public charities ‘ executives. Board members should make a compensation doctrine and a set of regulations or guidelines to follow when finding executive wage. That manner, the executive board can explicate to any stakeholder, whether it is an employee or giver, why the rate of wage is what it is.

Factors of Compensation

As with all other human resources enterprises, compensation should be strategic and should include an expressed guideline for base wage, inducements, and additions. Many different factors help find the rate of wage. A Chief executive officer ‘s compensation varies widely and is dependent upon the type of organisation, rank type, entire figure of employees, and entire one-year budget. To set it merely, more money, more staff, and more duties will ensue in a larger compensation bundle. The geographical location is another factor that determines the rate of wage normally based on the cost of life in a part. The findings through research illustrate that non-profit-making executive wage constructions are complicated and slightly hard to categorise.

In these unsmooth economic times, many top executives in the non-profit-making universe are taking wage cuts in order to increase their bottom-line. But, inordinate executive compensation has become an issue in others.

Executive compensation normally is grouped into three basic classs: ( 1 ) wage and benefits that do non depend on the house ‘s public presentation ; ( 2 ) options and other incentive compensation that are based on the public presentation of the house ‘s stock monetary value ; and ( 3 ) fillips and other incentive compensation that are based on the house ‘s public presentation harmonizing to specified accounting prosodies. The procedure used to find and set up executive compensation is so of import.

“ CEO Compensation Study helps givers, non-profit-making leaders and regulators make educated determinations about the rightness of a non-profit-making executive ‘s wage ( Charity Navigator ) . ” Leading a non-profit-making requires that an single must possess both an apprehension of the specific issues alone to the mission, and in add-on, a concern and direction expertness.

Attracting that sort of endowment requires a certain degree of compensation. Harmonizing to “ Nonprofit World ” , that degree of wage norms $ 160, 000 yearly.

Increased Public Scrutiny

Nonprofit organizations are faced with ethical quandary that for-profits are n’t normally concerned with. the examination being faced by non-profit executives with immense wages in the U.S.

It relates that back in the mid-1990s, Democratic Representative J. J. Pickle of Texas, president of the House commission with legal power over tax-exempts, was so defeated with large wages among the charities that he proposed no charitable executive should gain more than the U.S. president. It cites that several non-profit critics proposed that no charity executive must gain more than the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

Organizational Culture and Industry

“ The entire executive compensation bundle should incarnate the company ‘s vision, mission, aims, ends, and schemes. More specifically, the wage bringing system should be aligned with ends and aims ( Griffith ) . ” Nonprofit salary studies reveal that infirmaries and higher instruction groups pay the highest rewards, and at the other terminal of the spectrum, religion-related not-for-profits pay the lowest base wages. It is really of import to understand that in add-on to industry, an organisations size besides influences compensation bundles. “ Larger nonprofits by and large pay their main executives significantly more than smaller non-profit-making organisations pay ( Twombly & A ; Gantz ) . ”

One exclusion nevertheless is found in human service not-for-profits where “ higher executive compensation is tied to the organisation ‘s dependance on direct public support, irrespective of organisational size ( Twombly & A ; Gantz ) . ”

The compensation a CEO receives besides depends in portion on the types of plans and services offered by the charity.

Administration and the IRS

the governemtns aid, merely like the bond out orgs. Obama restrained exec wages… The new 990 specifies that the procedure of finding non-profit-making compensation should include the undermentioned: ( 1 ) reappraisal and blessing by independent individuals ; ( 2 ) comparison informations, and ( 3 ) contemporary confirmation of the deliberation and determination – in other words, you must enter your compensation procedure when it occurs – no backdating.

IRS continues to prioritise CEO compensation as one of its chief countries of focal point in bring outing deceitful non-profit-making patterns.

Pulling on its experience in look intoing charities, the IRS late redesigned the Form 990 ( the informational revenue enhancement return that charities must register yearly and the papers that Charity Navigator utilizes to obtain the necessary informations to rate each charity ) to supply more transparence sing executive compensation patterns. It is of import for each charity to carry on an independent reappraisal of its CEO ‘s wage utilizing comparative informations.

IRS ordinances call for compensation comparables:

For “ like ” services – occupations similar in duties and responsibilities.

In “ like ” enterprises – organisations similar in size, gross, or figure of employees and in a similar subsector would pay. Although budget size is frequently used as an indicant of size, a non-profit-making with a big budget, five employees, and one undertaking may non be an appropriate comparing with a non-profit-making group that has 50 lower-paid employees supplying direct services to clients. So it ‘s of import to see many factors. The IRS will besides accept for-profit comparings if appropriate.

In “ like ” fortunes – accounting for the value of extra benefits like lodging or transit.

( IRS ) late issued elaborate guidelines for IRS agents analyzing executive compensation at forprofit and non-profit corporations, including infirmaries. The subdivisions on “ non-qualified deferred compensation programs ” and “ fringe benefits ” are most relevant to non-profit infirmaries, harmonizing to Wayne Henry, a spouse in the jurisprudence house of Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP in Omaha, NE, who specializes in wellness attention and taxexempt issues. The guidelines follow and amplify issues raised by the bureau ‘s recent enforcement enterprise to reexamine compensation and benefits at tax-free organisations. In add-on, Henry notes, the IRS has modified its application for tax-free position ( Form 1023 ) for new organisations using for tax-free position beginning May I. The instructions for the new signifier include a sample “ confliet of involvement policy, ” with suggested commissariats specifieally for infirmaries. “ We believe infirmaries should be cognizant of these developments and take appropriate aetion to guarantee eomplianee with these issues, ” Henry said.

Here it is of import for readers to retrieve that unlike the for-profit sector, there is a long slowdown in clip from when a charity completes its financial twelvemonth and when it files its Form 990. In fact, many charities file their 990 eight months to a twelvemonth after their financial twelvemonth ends. So, although our analysis is based on the most current informations publically available, 80 % of the information for this survey is taken from the charities ‘ 2007 financial twelvemonth stoping.

The impact of the recession on the mean charity CEO wage will non be seen until future surveies.

Recommendations and Personal View

When lending my hard-earned money to charities and not-for-profits, I want my contribution to travel toward an efficient, effectual and mission-driven organisation. Donors everyplace will inquire themselves, “ Why am I lending to an organisation whose CEO is raking in all that hard currency? ” This is precisely why the IRS has stepped in to enforce restraints about what is “ lawfully sensible ” . When an organisation depends on contributions and public support, ‘legally sensible ‘ should be carefully as good advice. Alternatively, the best advice is finding what is ‘ethical an appropriate ‘ . While there is no clear definition of what is ethical or appropriate, it is ever a good thought to tilt on the side of cautiousness. It is demonstrated clip and clip once more that some not-for-profits prefer to utilize their money for munificent executive wage alternatively of carry throughing their mission. With such argument environing CEO wage, it should be considered that a chiseled wage construction be considered along with a defined threshold for acceptable wage in any non-profit-making organisation. Self ordinance begins with good administration. President Obama imposed a $ 500,000 salary cap on executive wage to organisations who receive authorities bailout money. So who ‘s to state the authorities wo n’t halt at that place and enforce a salary cap on organisations that get the benefit of revenue enhancement freedom and tax-deductible parts? For now, the IRS regulations merely say that a CEO should have ‘reasonable compensation ‘ – equivocal, obscure, and ill-defined nomenclature to state the least. Some charities go every bit far as holding “ multiple extremely paid household members on staff ( Charity Navigator ) . ”

Overpaid CEO ‘s are non merely violative they are destructive. Take for illustration the most recent headline of a public tumult over the YMCA of Greater Toledo, in Ohio. Robert Alexander, CEO, earns a basal wage of $ 270,357, which makes him the highest paid president and CEO in Ohio as reported by The Blade. His determination to shut of import community-needed plans and the South Y due to a deficiency of support was announced in late July of this twelvemonth, and shortly after triggered a community call. Furthermore, his immediate household, including his married woman and girls all work at the YMCA of Greater Toledo in executive-level places. The Ohio Attorney General is look intoing the fiscal operations of the YMCA. This is non to state that all not-for-profits are run so awfully, in fact there are more good entities than bad 1s, but one time assurance is destroyed, it is difficult to recover trust and it affects the full not-for-profit community. It is rather the dirt for a not-for-profit to cut plans due to budget restraints, freezing wage for staff association-wide, or even layoff staff members, and at the same clip senior executives ‘ big compensation bundles remain untasted or even worse they are given additions! It is a sad but true world. Where is the compassion? An organisation, particularly faith-based, should populate by the mission, and act in the organisation ‘s best involvement.

A company ‘s board of managers is all excessively frequently providing to the CEO, instead than oversing him. For this ground, we should n’t anticipate to see a dent in executive compensation anytime shortly.

In order to measure the rightness of executive compensation, an organisation should see about the organisation: the size, complexness, geographical location, mission, most significantly the fiscal status. Increase should besides be determined by the single makings necessary for the occupation at manus mensurating based on compensation at comparable organisations. Think about this: If wages at a not-for-profit are published on the front page intelligence, what would be a consequence of that?

In San Francisco, a step introduced to restrict wage for leaders of not-for-profits that receive important public support. An executive could gain “ no more than six times the wage and benefits of the lowest-paid full-time employee. ” This seems sensible and just.

The IRS recommends that little not-for-profits review salary informations for at least three comparable organisations, with the deduction that larger organisations should obtain more than three comparables.

That is the thought and it is shocking

Given the current economic clime

“ About on a day-to-day footing we learn of charities cutting plans, staff and wages. So, how could it be that the mean non-profit-making Chief executive officer was awarded a 6 % rise? ” ( Charity Navigator )

The IRS has even redesigned the Form 990, the information revenue enhancement return charities submit to the IRS yearly, in portion, to coerce greater transparence around non-profit-making compensation.

Given the degree of examination environing CEO wage, many would believe that the IRS would denominate a concrete figure as the threshold of acceptable wage. However, IRS regulations merely province that non-profit-making CEOs should have ‘reasonable compensation. ‘

Faith-based not-for-profit organisations which belive in equity and honestness, and are driven by their honest mission will pass on bible Bibles. Hypocrisy. … Which begs the inquiry “ Is the adult male genuinely worthy of his hire? ”

It is apparent that in most instances non-profit-making organisations are trusting on its organisation ‘s size to do compensation determinations. Would n’t it be ideal, to alternatively do a wage determination based on the public presentation of the organisation after first shaping, quantifying, and mensurating any and all societal benefits produced? Possibly, one time such steps exist, an organisation will be able to construction their CEO compensation so that it provides meaningful inducements and at the same clip respects the organisation ‘s intent and mission.


  • hypertext transfer protocol: //www.charitynavigator.org/__asset__/_etc_/CN_CEO_Compensation_Study_2009_Final.pdf
  • [ The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Will Change the Governance of Non Profit Organizations.
  • Nonprofit universe Wages in the Nonprofit Sector: Management, Professional, and Administrative Support Occupations. Writers: Butler, Amy1 Butler.Amy @ bls.gov.
  • Beginning: Compensation & A ; Working Conditions ; Oct2008, p1-1, 1p
  • Giroux, Gary, and Victor Wilson. “ Executive Compensation in Nonprofit Organizations: Evaluating Texas Independent School Districts Using Structural Equation Modeling. ” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & A ; Financial Management 18.4 ( 2006 ) : 395-419. Business Source Complete. Web. 5 Nov. 2009.
  • Grunewald, Donald. “ The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Will Change the Governance of Non Profit Organizations. ” Journal of Business Ethical motives 80.3 ( 2008 ) : 399-401. Business Source Complete. Web. 7 Nov. 2009.
  • MacDonald, Chris, Michael McDonald, and Wayne Norman. “ Charitable Conflicts of Interest. ” Journal of Business Ethics 39.1-2 ( 2002 ) : 67-74. Business Source Complete. Web. 11 Nov. 2009.
  • Twombly, Eric C. , and Marie G. Gantz. “ Executive Compensation in the Nonprofit Sector: New Findings and Policy Implications. ” Charting Civil Society 11 ( 2001 ) : n. pag. Web. 10 Nov. 2009.
  • & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/310372_cnp_11.pdf & gt ; .


I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out