The word “knowledge” was repeating many times throughout Frankenstein novel and attracted or forced the reader to happen out the true definition of it. Curiously. I decided to look up the definition of cognition from the Webster’s Dictionary. It defines. “Knowledge: n. Understanding gained by existent experience ; scope of information ; clear perceptual experience of truth ; something learned and kept in the head. ” ( Merriam-Webster Dictionary ) I realized this word is really straightforward. but has many utile and different significances to all of us. It is besides powerful tool to find and command the consequence of our judgement. “Knowledge consists in acknowledging the difference between good and bad decisions” . ( Knowledge Intellectual apprehension ) This statement seems to be one of the simple replies to the inquiry of ‘what is knowledge? ’
Knowledge can be powerful if we use it sagely and decently. but its unwisely usage may convey a harmless rumour or cause atrocious effects. The novel. Frankenstein. by Mary Shelley. was an interesting narrative with many comparings of the great powers in life. It contains many subjects of our society today. It contrasts scientific discipline and literary. engineering and homo. life and decease. and most significantly cognition and ignorance. It presents cognition in both negative and positive ways. In Frankenstein novel. three characters were used to seek for one thing in common or of import to them. the cognition. Sadly the consequences of their hunt were wholly different than they expected or anticipated. Walton. blinded by his aspiration. believed that hunt for cognition of the path to the North Pole would convey celebrity to his name. but learned that he has ended up merely with the danger to the lives of his crew. Frankenstein. driven by his passion and unable to accept his ain restrictions. learned that this passion for cognition injuries his judgement. and the surplus of his action leads to flooring effects.
The animal. driven by sadness. believed that cognition would be the reply to his hurting but merely found that it increased his sadness and unhappiness. Through each of these characters illustrations of successful and unsuccessful chase of cognition. there is a tragic self-respect in their forfeits. proposing that sometimes taking pride of aspiration would stop tragically. Marry Shelly presenting the construct of cognition to the reader for the first clip was in a missive of Captain Walton written to his sister. Margaret Saville. In this missive. Robert Walton described his desire for cognition of discover native district: “One man’s life or decease was but a little monetary value to pay for the skill of the cognition which I sought for the rule I should get and convey over the elemental enemies of our race. ” ( Shelly. Letter 4. p. 16 ) This statement showed that in Walton’s head this accomplishment of cognition was a top precedence. above life or decease. He was willing to decease or put on the line everything in the name of find and to be recognized among those who are celebrated. It besides explained that the hazards of hunt for cognition of Robert were excessively unsafe to disregard and dearly-won to human life.
As the leader of a group. he will be responsible for the lives of other work forces ; if he were do a ruthless determination in his chase of glorification and cognition. he would jeopardize those work forces. However. he was blinded by his compulsion of cognition to recognize or ignore this forfeit. After listening to Walton’s end of cognition. Frankenstein seemingly worried that Walton could give his life if he continues the journey ; hence. he decided to portion his ain advice. Walton remembered the most valuable piece of advice from Victor to him. “You seek for cognition and wisdom. as I one time did ; and I ardently hope that the satisfaction of your wants may non be a snake to biting you. as mine has been. ” ( Shelly. Letter 4. p. 17 ) Frankenstein was giving Walton a cautiousness message because he did non desire Captain Walton to follow in his footfalls of suffering and bad lucks by utilizing cognition in the negative manner.
Particularly. Walton was prosecuting a mission that could destroy his life or kill his crew. Frankenstein was reflecting on his yesteryear when he portions his counsel of cognition to Walton. He was believing about his error and how different his life would be if he were non making the monster. He was go throughing this helpful cognition onto Walton. trusting that Walton would larn from his error or it would assist Walton to understand the power of utilizing cognition unreasonably. Surely. Walton was able to larn from Frankenstein‘s advice and therefore forestall his crew from digesting barbarous decease by turning back and go forthing his aspiration behind. “I can non take them unwillingly to danger. and must return. ” ( Shelly. Walton. in CONTINUATION. p. 161 ) Walton was a searcher who learned the bounds of seeking.
There are two beginnings for gaining of cognition. One is through reading books and instruction. and the other through detecting from experience and pattern. This theory has been proved and supported by many illustrations in Frankenstein Novel. From his early age. Victor Frankenstein had a desire and thirst for cognition. Frankenstein said of his ain voice. “I was capable of a more intense application. and was more profoundly stricken with the thirst for cognition. ” ( Shelly. Chapter 2 – paragraph 1. P 22 ) He was a funny male child who wanted to calculate out the enigmas of making life. and became progressively obsessed with “natural philosophy” ; he read book by Cornelius Agrippa. a sixteenth-century bookman of the supernatural scientific disciplines. He studied the out-of-date findings of the alchemists Agrippa. Paracelsus. and Albertus Magnus with passion. With all of the cognition he had gained about nature and enigmas of the natural universe as a kid and through his readings and lessons Frankenstein’s compulsion of unnatural scientific discipline continued and grew stronger. At that minute Victor Frankenstein understood what his fate of how to be a scientist and to make something that the universe has ne’er seen before.
He was genuinely demoing his atrocious demand for scientific freedom and the opportunity for new finds. Frankenstein’s of import end was desired for cognition of how to make a life from non-life. This aspiration became his strength and failing that were more or less the same things. and were both linked together. To accomplish this desire. he decided to analyze how the human organic structure built. and chase to make unnatural human or scientific cognition by go toing college. While he prepared to go forth place for go toing University of Ingolstadt. his female parent died. He was suffered and felt lonely due to the doomed of his female parent ; hence. he planned to bring out the enigma of life. He said. “I ardently desired the acquisition of cognition. ” ( Shelly. chapter 3 p. 26 ) He conducted his experiments on making of life from non-life alone by following the illustration of the ancient alchemists. Clearly Victor’s hunt for cognition has driven him over the border. He brought himself out of a safe and normal society and put himself in danger. Victor’s cognition. one time a gift. had rapidly turned into an undeniable crisis for him and for all of close society.
Victor was so haunted with conveying the animal to life that he failed to believe of the possible effects ; he had ne’er thought about the consequence of his end and his duty if his dream would neglect. He did non acknowledge that cognition of natural scientific disciplines is the monetary value of his full life. This was his failing or bad judgement. At the terminal. he was struggled to confront the effects of his ain creative activity. I learned a batch from reading this narrative about a huffy scientist who created life out of decease ; particularly. how the chase of cognition that ever comes at a cost or can either take to devastation or wisdom. Sometimes the chase of cognition would necessitate a higher monetary value than we imagine or predict. The chase of cognition was at Victor Frankenstein‘s head. as his effort to billow beyond recognized human bounds and entree to secret of life. Finally it led him to make the monster and to his decease. He successfully created a animal that had the ability to populate and react. but he had no existent cognition of what could go on when he made a bad determination. Alternatively of taking duty on steering the animal to go good individual he abandoned it.
The animal spent its life larning about homo. how to take attention of himself and take retaliation on Frankenstein for holding created and abandoned it. The animal destroyed his creator’s closest friend and household members due to two grounds ; Victor did non follow with his demand ; and the animal wanted Victor to understand his feelings of lonely ; the feelings of holding cipher to love or no one to be love. When his household was ruined. Victor decided to go forth Geneva and all the painful memories behind him to trail and kill the monster. because he was huffy at the animal for holding destructing his life. Finally. Victor died to get away his desperation and compunction from his creative activity. Victor Frankenstein’s agony was the consequence of his hunt for cognition and its usage as a tool to demo that he could make better than God. “The chase of cognition is non needfully an evil thing. but it can do devastation when it is pursued beyond natural bounds. Victor Frankenstein becomes a slave to his passion for larning in more than one manner ; first his life is controlled by his compulsion to make life. and subsequently he becomes a slave to the monster he has created. ” ( The Concepts of Knowledge and Happiness in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. p. 1 )
This statement showed that there ever a high monetary value to pay or give for scientist who went excessively far in his chase of cognition. Victor Frankenstein did non recognize and see his chase for cognition would stalk and command his life until it became excessively late. Obviously. the monster journey of find of cognition was different than his Godhead. The animal was created through an experience of a superb scientist and instantly rejected by his Godhead. He has ne’er been decently taught of how to last around human and to separate between rights from incorrect. His chase to educate himself was the lone manner available to him. He was created as a adult adult male but has head of a kid. He was funny about human life such as communicating. feeling. behaviour. and regard for each other. First. he relied on his natural inherent aptitudes to last by roll uping nutrient and warming himself by abandoned fire cavities.
Finally. he strived for more ; hence. he decided to larn how to talk. read and show feeling by detecting and watching the households that lived in the bungalows. To accomplish his end of communicating with human. he needs to larn the basic cognition of the linguistic communication. He said. “I ought non to do the effort until I had first become maestro of their linguistic communication. which cognition might enable me to do them overlook the malformation of my figure. for with this besides the contrast perpetually presented to my eyes had made me acquainted. ” ( Shelly. Chapter 12. p. 80 ) Through difficult plants. the animal has accomplished his end finally. However. this want to be more like worlds costs the monster his felicity. As the animal admired human’s graceful heads and beautiful physical figures and was shocked by his ugliness when he caught sight of his contemplation in a pool of H2O. After recognizing he was dreadfully different from human existences. Painfully the monster cried and spoke of unhappiness for his probe of cognition.
He said. “I can non depict to you the torment that these contemplations inflicted upon me ; I tried to chase away them. but sorrow merely increased with cognition. ” ( Shelly. chapter 13. p. 87 ) and “Of what a unusual nature is cognition! It clings to the head. when it has one time seized on it. like a lichen on the stone. ” ( Shelly. Chapter 13. p. 87 ) This cognition took away the animal hope for felicity and filled his bosom with obnoxiousness and resentment. He decided to take retaliation on his Godhead because he was angry and blamed his Godhead for holding brought him to life as a monster. This retaliation was taken over the creature’s head. go forthing him unable to do wise judgements. Many guiltless lives were destroyed due to the animal attempted to destroy his Godhead life. Shockable. the animal thought he would be happy when other people live was ruined ; cognition would convey him happiness and community credence.
However. at the terminal. the monster realized his retaliation still did non fulfill his ain natural desires and cognition merely increased his unhappiness and sadness. True. he was the victim of his incorrect making: “You. who call Frankenstein your friend. seem to hold cognition of my offenses and his bad lucks. ” ( Shelly. Walton. In Continuation. p. 165 ) The animal was remarkably minded ; his actions were motivated by spirit. pure and simple. His hungriness for his created ground drove him to seek for cognition of his beginnings and being on this universe. The mentions of boisterous cognition are spread throughout the book ; it may non all be wholly relevant to any kind of societal importance but it still provided strong mean to the narrative.
This subject is strengthened by Shelley’s impressive and advanced manner. It presented through a absolutely planned and laid out narrative from the positions of Walton. the Monster. and Victor. all of whom systematically contribute to the subject of cognition. Frankenstein is a narrative about man’s compulsion to get cognition at all costs. Mary Shelly provides illustrations of the different ways to derive cognition and explores how characters are successful and unsuccessful in their pursuit for cognition. The book Frankenstein shows a man’s life that is ruined by his thirst for cognition. It is a great illustration of what happens when people take scientific discipline excessively far. without sing the effects of their actions. I learned a batch from reading this chilling narrative. I have to take a minute and inquire myself. when I am working in the country of engineering. whose involvements do I have in head? How will these developments affect society? What injury could my creative activity cause? One most of import inquiry I ask myself is how much am I willing to give in return for cognition?