Frankenstein Essay, Research Paper

I do non hold with the statement:

? Students in the 20 first century have little to larn from Frankenstein. ?

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Mary Shelley? s novel demonstrates the type of linguistic communication and intricate construction seldom found in novels today from which pupils in the 20 first century can larn much from. Mary Shelley puts frontward dateless lessons of one? s confrontation with one? s ego taking duty for your ain actions, the consequence of being shunned from society and the dangers of fiddling with nature. The novel foreshadows our really existent frights of the double-sided nature of scientific? advancement? doing it relevant today and turn outing the statement:

? Students in the 20 first century have little to larn from Frankenstein. ?

really incorrect.

Shelley puts frontward the issue of one? s confrontation with one? s ego due to Victor? s power of creative activity implying this. Victor symbolises modern adult male ; Victor? s is the quandary affecting the moral and rational struggle between the values of ego and the values of society:

? Natural doctrine is the mastermind that has regulated my fate. ? ( p87 )

Unfortunately, through Frankenstein? s haughtiness he puts his personal involvement above that of society and so is the cause of his ain devastation.

This is an of import lesson for the young person of the 20 first century to larn.

Shelley uses affectional linguistic communication and an intricate construction from which pupils can larn to back up a fresh full of moral lessons. Shelley? s linguistic communication creates images in her reader? s head which intensify the ambiance:

? The Sun is everlastingly seeable, it? s wide disc merely hedging the skyline and spreading a ageless splendour. ? ( p11 )

The construction of the fresh subconsciously gives the reader the feeling of loose terminals to which we must use or imaginativeness, merely as scientific discipline is unsure and full of loose terminals. The technique of layering the novel that Shelley uses adds a sense of unknoting a cryptic myth. Students analyzing Frankenstein in the 20 first century can larn a batch from the construction techniques and layering that Shelley uses in the novel

A value drilled into the young person of the 20 first century is to take duty for your actions. This lesson is demonstrated when Victor Frankenstein, exposing a deficiency of moral premeditation, rejects his creative activity go forthing it to fend for itself both physically and mentally. Victor? s efforts to do alibis for his deficiency of duty prove futile and he pays the ultimate monetary value:

? My feelings are profound, but I possessed a imperturbability of judgement that fitted me for celebrated accomplishments. But this idea, which supported me in the beginning of my calling, now serves merely to immerse me lower into the dust. ? P238

Frankenstein? s household is destroyed is destroyed and he dies a spiritually broken adult male. Shelley wanted all who read her novel to larn from Victors state of affairs:

? Learn my wretchednesss and do non seek to increase your own. ? ( p253 )

Physical and psychological agony as a consequence of being shunned from society is an of import issue that all young person should understand and the state of affairs sing this issue put frontward in Frankenstein is one to be learned from. Shelley considered the animal to be the natural pure province of a human being ; she so used it to expose the effects of corruptness by society:

? The feelings of kindness and gradualness which I had entertained but a few minutes before gave topographic point to a beastly fury and gnashing of dentitions. Inflamed by hurting, I vowed ageless hate and retribution to all mankind. ? ( p158 )

Shelley aimed to learn that ugliness on the outside doesn? T reflect what is on the interior, and that ugliness on the interior is frequently provoked by society.

Shelley strongly emphasises the issue that nature is non to be tampered with by coercing Frankenstein to pay the monetary value with the retribution that is exacted upon him. It is besides in this manner that Shelley attempts to rectify the moral balance of the novel. This lesson is peculiarly relevant to the young person of the 21st century as it displays upseting analogues to fiddling with atomic energy. Merely as the effects of Frankenstein? s creative activity reverberated throughout Europe and the animal murdered Frankenstein? s household and caused mayhem in every town it entered, any atomic accident will do mayhem as it spreads like a disease to all environing states.

Frankenstein teaches the young person of the 21st century valuable lessons. There is something to be learned from every event that takes topographic point in the novel. All the moral issues in Frankenstein tie in with doubtless the most of import and dateless lesson, If you don? Ts take duty for your actions you with pay the monetary value. And as the fresh terminals with the words? darkness and distance? , so to is the modern reader left all to aware of the darkness in society today ; surrounded as we are by the reminders of our scientific promotion, we still have no thought where we stand and where we are headed. Should we stay blind to the effects of our actions we will pay the monetary value.


I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out