& # 8220 ; 1984 & # 8243 ; Essay, Research Paper
Down WITH BIG BROTHER, the ubiquitous leader of Ingsoc, or
English socialism, and the force that has society in a frailty of fright and ignorance. It is in
George Orwells grim dystopia 1984 that these fortunes exist. It was written in 1949
as a warning to where society could be headed. George Orwell was an English author that
had merely witnessed the horrors or World War II and the power of a strong cardinal leader
that about took over the whole of Europe, Hitler. All of these factors form Orwells & # 8217 ;
composing that is 1984.
This book is a warning that if the universe stayed on its current path, the universe of
Large Brother would non be every bit improbable as it seemed. The book is a satirical dystopia that
warns of the dangers of totalitarian authoritiess like those of Russia or China. The book is
still relevant today because of how easy we could steal into the ways of Ingsoc,
Newspeak for English Socialism, the system of authorities in 1984.
George Orwell & # 8217 ; s chief contentions are that this universe portrayed in book was non
merely possible but speedy to come approximately. Orwell & # 8217 ; s belief of such a drastic alteration in such a
short clip could be related to the times he would hold merely witnessed in existent life. Hitler
and the Nazi party rose to power in the short clip between World War I and World War
II. The Party rose to power and instituted there authorities in a affair of one or two
coevalss. George Orwell wrote this book in 1949 and we find Winston in April of
1984, Orwell believed that we were on such a incorrect class that the likes of Ingsoc could
rise in 35 old ages.
Aldous Huxley, writer of Brave New World, had a different position of how to maintain
society in bondage. In his book, he uses drugs and sex to maintain the multitudes in entry as
opposed to the repression of sex to maintain people in a frenziable fury found in 1984. The
quality the two books portion is the usage of drugs to maintain society in a daze for easier
control. In Huxley & # 8217 ; s book they use a absolutely manufactured drug that makes everything
seem great and Orwell uses cheap, oily Victory Gin to maintain the people numbed. The two
books paint ugly images of a controlled society but Orwell & # 8217 ; s is more realistic due to its
The lone job I had with the book is that the 2nd half drags excessively much. Early
on, Orwell makes it really clear that the Party can non be taken down, so when Winston
receives the book from O & # 8217 ; Brien it is obvious that he is portion of the thought constabulary. The book
should hold non been gone into so profoundly because it is non of import to the sto
ry and is
really uninteresting. It could be that Orwell writes so good that it was hard non to cognize what
was traveling to go on in the 2nd half of the book.
The narrative itself was really good written and served good as the warning it was meant
to be. I merely wish that Orwell would hold given even a small spot of hope for world.
Winston coming to love Big Brother left you disappointed that the human spirit didn & # 8217 ; t win
out over conformance and oppresion. I suppose that had Winston died with disdain would
hold given hope that we would be able to acquire out of such a state of affairs if necessary and
hence come offing off at the cogency of Orwell & # 8217 ; s warning.
I am non to sure whether message is that the constitution is excessively strong and it & # 8217 ; s no
usage combat or to contend the good battle no affair what the odds. In Winston & # 8217 ; s instance, he made
no difference whatsoever and died loving Big Brother like everybody else. Julia, Winston,
Parsons, Syme and the poet all died and made non a shred of difference because the party
had absolute power so I can merely presume that Orwell issued this warning so it would ne’er
acquire that bad but what if it did. This book confused me because it went against the belief
that one adult male can do a difference. Winston had the strong belief but was unable to even
do a dent in the party & # 8217 ; s stronghold on society. The book sent assorted messages about the
power of one individual and I am non certain if I like that.
1984 is a great book but the inability of good to get the better of evil fusss me. I have
ever believed that the lone changeless thing is alteration and the strength of Ingsoc seems
impossible to alter. The power of the party about makes seem unrealistic that it could
truly go on but with a closer expression it truly doesn & # 8217 ; t. Power seems to snowball in that
one time it starts it is truly had to halt so a society like that of this book is non unrealistic. The
2nd half retarding forces but it is effectual with the surprise of the telescreen in Charrington & # 8217 ; s
store. The book is really good but doesn & # 8217 ; t sit right with me because it makes a individual
individuals strong belief insignificant against a larger power.
1984 by George Orwell is an unsettling book that raises a batch of inquiries and
concerns about power. The flow of the book, although slow at times, is effectual and
makes an feeling on the reader. The authorship manner is detailed but concise and covers a
batch of land associating to political power and society. The quality that makes it relevant
even though 1984 has come and gone is that we are ever at the hazard of allowing a society
like the one in 1984 sneak up on us.