After assorted Hagiographas by Richard Rodriguez and Octavio Paz. I have come across several realisations. Who am I? Should I be a portion of a state and a “system” that does non value me. or should I be a portion of a state that does non admit my being? The United States as a state does non value me. and Mexico does non even know that I exist. These are hard affairs to discourse. We are all in hunt of our ain individuality. However. some of us are placed in a state of affairs that makes it really hard and confounding to cognize or understand. I have ever asked myself. “Who am I?
” I should set it in more rough words. “Where do I belong? ” After this specific inquiry is asked. I begin to recognize that I have jobs coming up with a response. My parents were born in Mexico. and therefore. they are Mexican. Sometimes I feel I belong here in the United States. but other times I feel more affiliated to Mexico. I am a Mexican-American. However. I feel that I am denying in some manner my heritage and my civilization by stating that I am. I am denying my parents. I say that I’m Mexican because in a sense I am. I am besides an American. I am a Mexican-American. What do these footings put together imply?
They should connote that the individual is Mexican and American. The term “Mexican-American” is the really ground why I find myself confused about who I truly am. I need to seek for my ain individuality. which leads me to the intent of this essay. Rodriguez and Paz have discussed this peculiar job of individuality. All three have different point of views. Some of their thoughts are similar but largely contradictory. particularly in the instance of Rodriguez and Paz. As I was reading. I was able to associate to what they had to state. and in a much bigger sense. I was able to understand and cognize who I am.
I was able to happen my ego. Harmonizing to Paz. self-discovery is most than anything recognizing that we are entirely. Paz argues that our being or our individuality becomes a job and a inquiry. It becomes a job because of several grounds. We merely don’t merely wake up one twenty-four hours and recognize that we don’t cognize who we are. There are persons who are placed in hard state of affairss that allow for these inquiries to originate. For illustration. the migration of Mexicans to the United States is a state of affairs that will decidedly do many to oppugn their individuality.
I agree because if we had non moved to the United States. I would merely see myself a Mexican without a uncertainty. Paz strongly argues that different fortunes are likely to bring forth different reactions. This migration is a circumstance that will convey about confusion among the Mexicans about who they truly are. It is dry how a few stat mis can convey about such a alteration in you. Personally. I have experiences such a confusion by merely traveling 20 stat mis North of where I lived. I lived in Reynosa since I was eight. Then. my household and I moved here to McAllen. At the beginning. you don’t experience rather like you fit.
It makes it really hard because it is a wholly different universe. Even though the bulk of the people are of Mexican beginning. it still makes it really hard. After the old ages. I became slightly used to the life here and began to experience comfy. However. I besides began to oppugn my individuality. It is the minute we cross that boundary line that we lose our individuality. Paz argues that alternatively of inquiring ourselves inquiries. we should make something about it. We can non travel on contemplating who we are. instead. we should work with our state of affairs and make something. Our inquiries are merely an alibi for non facing world.
I agree with Paz because sometimes. we continue to kick and kick and merely believe about our present state of affairs. However. we do nil to alter it. I believe that Mexican-Americans demand to halt speaking about our unfairnesss and favoritism and make something. However. Paz does advert that Mexicans have an lower status composite. We begin to doubt our ain abilities. This happens because of our civilization. We are taught to listen and remain quiet. On the other manus. Anglo-americans are taught to voice their sentiments. There are many differences in both the Anglo-American civilization and Mexican civilization.
These differences are the ground why it is impossible to intermix or blend. We are brought into a civilization that is the complete antonym of ours. This is the ground why Paz says that our “Mexicanism” merely floats. It ne’er exists. and it ne’er goes off. One of the ways we react to this state of affairs is by flashing our differences. Paz negotiations about pachucos. They are a group of people of Mexican beginning that are known for their linguistic communication. behaviour. and vesture. I remember when I went to high school and we had a pep mass meeting. which landed right on September 16. which is Mexico’s independency.
A group of friends and I decided to have on ruddy. white. and green to observe Mexico’s independency. We were merely proud of being Mexicans and wanted to demo our pride. However. there were jobs with several of the decision makers because it wasn’t merely my friends and I making it. but other people as good. The ginger mass meeting was canceled because they felt that our vesture would deflect and do struggle with the other “American” pupils in school. As I was reading Paz. he mentioned that Mexicans dress a certain manner to stand out. They know they are rejected by the “American” society.
They do this to be different and stand out. The camouflage is a protection because it hides and points them out. Somehow. they are making this to “belong” in some manner. They are able to catch the attending of the Anglo-Americans. I don’t agree with Paz. I believe that sometimes people dress a certain manner to demo their pride. I do non dress a certain manner to be different and so people can detect me. I am proud to be Mexican and want to demo it off. When 4th of July comes. I besides like to dress in ruddy. white and bluish to observe America’s independency. Is this possible or am I being a dissembler?
This inquiry leads me to Richard Rodriguez. Richard Rodriguez’ Hunger of memory is an autobiography. I was able to read lone portion of his book. I found it rather intriguing. Rodriguez goes through many jobs of individuality. He has mixed feelings about his ain ego. He chiefly talks about affirmatory action. What does the term “minority student” mean? Is it something we want to be classified as? I had an experience in high school in which a pupil denied a portion of himself. His female parent is Anglo and his male parent is Mexican. However. throughout school. when it was clip to look into on the ethnicity. he would look into out Anglo.
He did this throughout his old ages in school. but when it was his senior twelvemonth something happened. He decided to travel talk to his counsellor and state her to alter all his paperwork. He no longer wanted to be classified as Anglo. but Hispanic. When I heard this. it was really surprising. I can non understand how this peculiar individual decided to merely go Hispanic merely so he could acquire the benefits of affirmatory action. He was using to scholarships and assorted universities. and he knew that if he was classified as a minority pupil. he would have better benefits.
This is non right. You can non merely take to be Latino for your convenience. You should non reject a portion of yourself merely for your ain benefits. Rodriguez faced this quandary. He knew that he did non desire to be labeled a minority pupil. but if this is what was traveling to acquire him in society. so he merely had to accept. Throughout life. Rodriguez wondered about his individuality. He was criticized by many because he was a well-known author who was invited as a invitee talker. He would be around Anglo-Americans. and many criticized him because they felt he had become a portion of them.
Is this truly true? Isn’t your individuality how “you” see yourself? Merely because other people see you being around another category or race of people. doesn’t mean that you have become a portion of them. You merely cognize that you are Mexican. American. or Mexican-American. and intermixing with other civilizations doesn’t needfully intend you lose your true ego. Because of affirmatory action. Rodriguez was able to be a invitee talker. and a professor at a university. He felt threatened at times because the felt slightly alienated by the “other” society.
Rodriguez did non hold a good relationship with the Chicano pupils. He felt threatened by them. These pupils were still attached to their parents’ civilization. These pupils knew how to talk Spanish really good. They were proud of their yesteryear. Rodriguez on the other manus. radius in English. His Spanish was non that good. He did non desire to tie in himself to a yesteryear that meant “poor” . There was one specific clip when Rodriguez’ parents saw a Latino pupil have oning a serape. They were really surprised. Rodriguez said that these pupils were foolish to believe themselves unchanged by their schooling.
I disagree with Rodriguez because I believe that merely because you are acquiring a higher instruction and hold a good occupation. you forget that you are Latino or Mexican-American. Rodriguez merely wanted to warrant his ain alteration. He did non desire to belong or maintain a bond between a past that did non convey fond memories. He was non every bit disadvantaged as other Hispanics. However. he felt really strongly about non traveling to Chicano pupil meetings or societal events sponsored by “La Raza. ” I don’t agree with him. After reading this. I realized that he is incorrect. I am proud to be Mexican-American.
I am proud to transport the term “Mexican” and “American. ” I am proud of my Mexican civilization. imposts. and beliefs. I don’t need to alter in order to win or achieve a higher instruction. Rodriguez all of a sudden came to this realisation. He could non merely project out his civilization and merely wipe out it. At some point. he had a treatment with his several Latino pupils in which he did non hold with them. Soon. he was known to others as being a “coconut. ” brown on the exterior. white on the interior. I have learned many things this semester. I had non truly given much thought Mexican-American history.
I ne’er realized about the assorted things that were discussed. It was an oculus opener. I was besides able to recognize of the many jobs and unfairnesss that Hispanics face here in the United States. However. merely like Paz said. we can non merely contemplate these issues. We need to make something about them. I am go toing college to have a higher instruction. I know that instruction is highly of import. However. I am non losing my individuality by coming to college. Geting an instruction does non needfully do you a different individual. I don’t agree with Rodriguez’s point of view.
After reading Paz and Rodriguez. I began to see myself in some of what they had to state. I realized that I have gone through a confusion phase. I sometimes don’t know where I belong or who I am. I have come to the decision that I am merely American. America is a state filled with assorted cultural groups. Spanish americans include people from Mexico. Honduras. Puerto Rico. Nicaragua. etc. There are besides many Asians. I frequently ask myself why people from Ireland populating here in America aren’t labeled Irish-American. They are merely American. Why so should we be labeled Mexican-American?
Cant’ we merely be called American? I have come to the decision that I am American. American can intend different things to different people. To me American means being a portion of Mexico every bit good as the United States. I consider myself a lucky individual. I am able to be hold the best of both universes: Mexico and the United States. Tomorrow. I will observe Mother’s Day here in the United States and Monday it will be 10 de mayo. Dia de las Madres in Mexico. My ma is really lucky. She gets two gifts. I don’t believe that I am being a dissembler by making this. These are some of the advantages of being American.