Antigen Essay Brainstorm Through Scene V, the reader and Croon progressively learn about the value of listening; especially to other people, and that it can help people see what the eyes can’t, and can open up a window of reason and realization of one’s flaws. Croon fails to listen to anyone prior to Scene V, but in this scene, he is forced to submit his pride to the omens suggested by Terrorists, and then is revealed to the fact that many of his actions have in fact been corrupted.
Once Croon learns to use all of his senses, he finds that listening to alternate opinions can shed a new light on a subject, and help roommate a more educated and sensible approach towards any situation. The reader follows Screen’s change from ignorant to thoughtful, and learns how listening can reveal a new perspective on everything. All throughout the first part of the play, and the first part of Scene V, people try to reason Croon and tell him his actions are wrong, but he falls to listen to them and falls to see the wave of consequences, ready to break over his head.
Even In Scene I, Chorals tries to lead Croon and tell him that the gods may be against him, but he cuts back “Stops Must you doddering wrecks go out of your heads entirely? Which is one of the first examples of how Croon denies the obvious signs that he is doing something wrong because he fails to listen to others (peg. 201). To deny the ideas of anyone is unwarranted, but to do so and oppose the gods, is surely sacrilegious. In Greek religion, the gods are the overpowering force that is behind everything, and humans have little to no power compared to them.
Furthermore, opposing the gods is something that could hypothetically change someone’s fate for the worse. Croon continues this denial through the beginning of Scene V where he claims to Telesales that “[he Is] not aware hat [he] ever failed to listen” to him or anyone else, which Is a complete Ill according to the acts of Ignorance Croon had shown In the past (peg 230). This really tells the reader that he is not only denying ideas from other people, but also denying the fact that he is denying anything.
Here again, Croon exhibits the caliber of ignorance that he has reached, and suggests to the reader that he has reached the climax, and must begin to change before it is too late. After listening to Terrorist’s big speech, Croon begins to open his mind to Terrorist’s insight of the omen sent to him by the gods. At first, the words of Terrorists didn’t seem to have much of an affect on Croon, but as the speech carries on, it becomes more and more threatening towards Croon, and this fear penetrates his fortified mental wall.
When Terrorists tells Croon that locking up Antigen in the woods is “[his] creme:Dan the Furled and the dark gods of Hellhole swift with terrible punishment for [him], Croon has a moment of realization that his actions may very well lead to his downfall. Through this he realizes how he had Ignored his other senses and just focused on what he saw as the best plan. He learned the old lesson tarring into a blank world.
One can’t get a full vision of something Just through sight, but with the addition of listening, one can not only see the surface, but also hear little discrepancies and important details that can change the perspective of the situation. Croon finally learns in Scene V, how to pair sight with hearing to open his mental horizons to all aspects and outlooks of every situation, and subsequently makes a more educated decision about the fate of Antigen. Finally he comes to his senses that he has to release Antigen, and agrees, “It is hard to deny the heart! But [he] will o it: [he] will not fight with destiny’ for a fear that his own is at stake.
The reader witnesses Croon throughout Scene V evolve from being oblivious to open-minded and thoughtful all through the power of listening. When Croon stops relying on his personal sight to do all of his thinking, and allows others’ views enter his mind, he is able to make the right decision about Antigen, and has a new mentality about decision making. This idea of the importance of listening is very valuable outside of Greek Tragedy because every decision should help the decision maker, and anyone who the decision affects, no matter if in a story or in real life.
Plus, when people have a thought in their head, it is immediately considered correct by their brain unless someone else says differently. So, when one has an idea that has been confirmed by multiple sources, it is not only best for themselves, but also society as well. Have I named specifically the values of listening? Do I argue how the scene inspires the audience to recognize the value of listening Do I show my reader how my evidence works to support my thinking and why is it relevant? Do I build my ideas logically? Do I leave my reader with a sense of why my argument matters or is interesting?