This paper is traveling to analyze the difference between Black Bike hebdomad and Harley Davidson Spring Bike Rally ( preponderantly white ) in Myrtle Beach. South Carolina. We are traveling to see if the NAACP had a valid ground to register a case against Myrtle Beach and several of its concerns. If so. we are traveling to see how risk direction could’ve played a bigger function in forestalling the case from go oning. We will besides be discoursing ethical considerations that might be applicable to this instance. Then. we’ll determine which beginnings of jurisprudence would be most relevant in this instance and how direction could leverage cognition of beginnings to forestall similar cases in the hereafter.

Sum up the actions that lead to the case. Myrtle Beach is a popular tourer finish among people of all walks of life throughout the universe. One of the things Myrtle Beach is known for is its Bike rallies. One is called Black Bike hebdomad and the other Harley Davidson Spring Bike Rally. For old ages they have been seeking to ban/restrict the activities that go on during Black Bike hebdomad. The NAACP took it amongst them to action the metropolis of Myrtle Beach and a few of its constitutions for favoritism. The lone clip during the twelvemonth where the bulk of tourers are black is on Memorial twenty-four hours weekend. during Black motorcycle hebdomad. So. the NAACP filed a brace of Federal cases saying that Molly Darcy’s and the American Pancake and Omelet house refused to function visitants of Black Bike hebdomad. They closed their concerns during extremum times to forbear from functioning the black clients.

Another ailment states that even though during the Harley Davidson Spring Bike Rally. a part of Ocean Boulevard was closed off for an afternoon to command a battle between two bike packs. the Hell’s Angels and Pagans. Even with things like this go oning during white motorcycle hebdomad and nil of this nature during black motorcycle hebdomad. eating house proprietors and concerns still refuse to service visitants of the black motorcycle hebdomad. Discourse what direction could hold done in footings of hazard direction to hold prevented the events that lead to the case. Risk direction is an of import concern map and a major portion of the concern planning procedure. The functions and duties of hazard direction are to seek and extinguish or cut down the hazard of holding certain things happen that can present a menace to your concern. The hazard manager/team has to be identified and so the hazard director will invent a program to acquire rid of any hazards that may hold a negative impact on the concern.

The direction of these concerns could hold taken better stairss and safeguards to avoid this. Even though this is 2012 and we have a Black President. the universe still sees colour. Race is a large part/the ground for a batch of cases against concerns. The company’s should’ve either closed for both bicycling events or if it was a affair of safety that they were concerned with. they should’ve beefed up the security. All in all. they should hold had better hazard direction in topographic point to forestall this. Most little concerns don’t have the financess to manage judicial proceeding. Money is a fueling factor for any and all concerns and all money is green. For them to shut during one of the busiest hebdomads of the twelvemonth would hold been a enormous loss. The concerns. more than probably did non hold a hazard direction squad in topographic point since they are little concerns. Most little concerns don’t invest in hazard direction or a legal squad. Companies have a societal duty to be just. merely. and handle all clients equal.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The direction squad of the eating houses were utilizing prejudiced client service by shuting while the Black motorcycle hebdomad was traveling on. Discrimination can do companies an unmeasurable sum of money and strip them of qualified workers. Discourse the ethical considerations reflected in the Torahs applicable to this instance. Traveling frontward these companies need to calculate out how they are traveling to advance ethical behaviour. First they must re-write their mission statement to reflect their new ethical behaviour. Or they can create/adopt a codification of moralss. The codification of moralss will allow the company’s’ employees know their outlooks and clarifies the regulations and ordinances of that company. The company could besides supply moralss developing to its direction and employees. Ethical motives is really of import in life and concern. If a company doesn’t have a good ethical standing and repute among its clients so they are likely to lose a batch of concern because of it. So. when a company gets sued for something every bit serious as favoritism. whether it is true or false. people are traveling to take a measure back and truly analyze that concern to see if possibly they experienced something similar when they visited the constitution but didn’t truly pay that much attending to it.

So. now the company has to work five times every bit hard as its equals to seek and construct their repute and so that people can see them for a great ethical company. Determine which beginnings of jurisprudence would be most relevant in this instance and how direction could leverage cognition of those beginnings to forestall similar cases in the hereafter. In respects to the instance of the NAACP versus Myrtle Beach. I feel as though statues would be the most relevant beginning of jurisprudence in this instance. Everyone should be entitled to be services. good etc. without favoritism of gender. race. etc. This wasn’t the instance here. A group of people were allegedly discriminated upon during a certain period of clip because of the colour of their tegument based upon impressions that black people bring problem. Well. problem doesn’t see colour. problem will follow whomever whenever. It seems rather obvious that direction wasn’t cognizant or didn’t truly care to be cognizant of the legislative acts of the jurisprudence. Had they been cognizant. they could’ve stopped the case from go oning.

In the universe we live in. sad to state. but some people look for chances to do a fiscal addition. So. as a concern proprietor you should ever. ever know more about Torahs than your clients so that you can remain a measure in front and prevent things like this from go oning. Besides. Regulations is a beginning of jurisprudence that could be used for this instance. Since the NAACP filed the instance federally. ordinances would assist in make up one’s minding the destiny of this instance. Regulations would assist to find and stipulate for the company the mandatary demands that it must adhere to. Recommend what direction might be able to make to prosecute alternate declarations ( outside of tribunal ) . The said concerns and the metropolis of Myrtle Beach may be able to settle or come to an understanding outside of tribunal ; and by making so. it will assist to take down legal fees. come to a solution Oklahoman than subsequently. and avoid a immense media dirt. Negotiation is a popular manner that people come to understandings. You can see dialogues as either good or bad to look at the yesteryear or the present and hereafter. Some don’t like to make dialogues without legal representation nowadays because the mediation can be hard and it can set a strain on the best of relationships.

Another alternate difference declaration is mediation. It is well less dearly-won and less counter than a case. The mediation procedure consists of a impersonal 3rd party who helps the two parties come to a common understanding. The difference between a justice and a go-between is that a go-between can non order the declaration they parties must come to an understanding on their ain and base by it. The go-between is at that place merely to be a listening ear so at that place isn’t any back and Forth and so no 1 goes back on the understanding. A minitrial is besides another alternate difference declaration that could be used to assist come to a declaration. Both parties are represented by legal advocate and in the terminal both parties reciprocally decide on the concluding determination. The declaration will be enforced by a contract that the tribunals will implement. Lawyers from both parties take a few hebdomads to construct their instance and so they will sit down in a test format. If they can non make an understanding the 3rd party representative can give an sentiment that is nonbinding.


Bagley. E. C. . & A ; Savage. D. ( 2010 ) . Directors and the Legal Environment. Mason. Ohio: Cengage Learning Mccue. D. . ( 2011 ) . NAACP Sues Myrtle Beach for Discrimination. Courthouse News Service. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. courthousenews. com/2011/05/31/36933. htm National Institute of Standards and Technology. ( 2011 ) . What are Regulations. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //standards. gov/regulations. cfm What is Risk Management. ( 2011 ) . The importance of Risk Management to Business Success. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. whatisriskmanagement. cyberspace


I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out