The broad humanist Matthew Arnold frequently maintains that he respects scientists and the scientific disciplines. What he rejects was the promise that scientific discipline entirely will better the human status ; the suggestion that the scientific disciplines deserve a topographic point of greater prominence than the humanistic disciplines. Harmonizing to him. scientific discipline is uncomplete without poesy ( art and literature ) . In his essay “The Study of Poetry” ( 1880 ) he contends that:

“ More and more world will detect that we have to turn to poetry to construe life for us. to consol us. to prolong us- without poesy our scientific discipline willWithout poesy. our scientific discipline will look uncomplete ; and most of what now passes with us for faith and doctrine will be replaced by poesy. Science. I say. will look uncomplete without it. For finely and genuinely does Wordsworth name poesy “the impassioned look which is in the visage of all science” ; and what is a visage without its look? Again. Wordsworth finely and genuinely calls poetry “the breath and finer spirit of all knowledge” ; look uncomplete ; and most of what now passes for faith and doctrine will be replaced by poesy. Science. I say. will look uncomplete without it. For finely and genuinely does Wordsworth name poesy “the impassioned look which is in the visage of all scientific discipline ; ” and what is a visage without its look? Again Wordsworth finely and genuinely calls poetry “the breath and finer spirit of all knowledge” . ( p 604 ) To set it in other words. Arnold considers poetry to be superior to science. doctrine and faith. He proposed that doctrine and faith would be replaced by poesy in modern society.

x

Hi!
I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out