The Era of Good Feeling: The Effectss and Consequences of Nationalism and Sectionalism In 1815. shortly before the start of James Monroe’s presidential term and after the War of 1812. a historical period known as the “Era of Good Feeling” commenced in America. However. though the name of this age entirely insinuated a clip of integrity and prosperity within the state. provincialism became an univocal quandary that seeped through the government’s efforts in advancing patriotism. and finally divided the state. The Era of Good Feeling was a clip where merely one political party reigned. sense of integrity prevailed. and national pride was apparent within the citizens. This postwar patriotism fueled the state to work towards a common end. and even encouraged creative activity of traditions that would be passed down coevalss.
The McCulloch v. Maryland instance in 1819 exhibits government’s effort in seting up a incorporate forepart to farther promote patriotism. In this instance. the Congress’ power is questioned when the opinion prevented provinces from criminalizing or taxing the national bank. as Maryland tried to make. The papers provinces. “The power of the general authorities. it has been said. are delegated by the provinces. who entirely are genuinely sovereign” ( Document 4 ) . However. the result of the instance merely came to demo that the federal authorities had more power compared to the province authorities. and therefore portrayed a stronger. incorporate system. In Document 3. people are portrayed to be observing Independence Day on the 4th of July within the same twelvemonth of the instance. This depicts the consequence that national pride had. conveying together multiple races. genders. societal categories. and age groups to observe the country’s independency. Furthermore. this epoch besides brought forth a cardinal period in America known
as the Industrial Revolution. This introduced market economic system to the population and transitioned America to fabrication procedures that brought economic benefits to the North. Market economic system non merely changed the manner people worked. but besides the manner they lived. as it divided labour. based work in mills. and opened new markets like the American Fur Company. Due to the anterior Embargo Act. merchandisers besides invested in national local fabrication. and therefore allowed for the rapid development of urban territories and increase in population. It brought wealth to the North’s marketbased economic system but contradicted with the South’s focal point on an agricultural economic system that depended on slaves.
One of the most important developments within the state was introduced shortly after the War of 1812. by politician Henry Clay. as the American System. The program promoted a system in which the South was seen to be the manufacturer of natural goods. North for the fabrication. while the West as the breadbasket of the state. It consisted of three parts: the development of canals. route systems and railwaies. creative activity of a protective duty. and the reinstating of the Bank of U. S. .
The North prospered from the creative activity of the duty as it helped develop the fabricating economic system. The West. on the other manus. benefitted from the creative activity of route and canal system. a program supported by John C. Calhoun. in order to forestall disunion within the quickly turning state. ( Document 2 ) . These developments in transit allowed for easier distribution of goods. therefore profiting them every bit good. However. the protective duty prevented the South’s economic system from turning. therefore taking to an apparent economic spread between the North and the South. as the former’s economic system started to din due to the addition in fabrication.