There are different civilizations in many topographic points all over the universe. The Nayar of India civilization stood out to me from many others. The manner they unite in matrimony. heal illness. their beliefs and values. and affinity took me by a great surprise. Their manner of life is really alone. Turning up and life in a topographic point such as America. where the civilizations are similar in many ways makes me really interested in civilizations such as theirs. In this research paper I plan to place their primary manner of subsistence. the facets of the civilization. and comparison and contrast the civilization to my ain.
The Nayar of India small towns are chiefly compromised of household farms. They are considered to be emerging agriculturists. Their economic system is based on the cultivation of coconuts and rice. The traditional Nayar compound is typically a garden place. The households grew everything they needed to provide their ain households. Their diet consisted of largely rice. coconuts. porc. and fish. cooked in a assortment of different ways for each repast ( Panikkar. 1918 ) .
The Nayar of Indians is Christians and Muslims. Over 1000s of old ages of considerable influence by mainstream spiritual faith denominations such as Christianity. Judaism. and Hinduism. the Nayar have been well un-phased in following one of the recognized faiths. While the Nayar do utilize Hindu temples for worship and ceremonials. the nature of these peculiar patterns are non recognized under any Hindu credo or other faith for that affair. The Nayar belief in thaumaturgy and spirit worship continues although they are recognized leaders in literature and music within their civilization and later would non be considered barbarian. Another feature of the Nayar people is where they fit within a caste society. “A caste is an endogamic societal grouping into which a individual is born and within which a individual remains throughout his or her life-time. It is an ascribed place. ” ( Nowak and Laird. 2010 ) .
The affinity system of the Nayars is similar to most civilizations. but it differs besides. They follow matrilinear dissention and are said to pattern polygyny ( Nowak and Laird. 2010 ) . This is one of the few societies that pattern polyandry. where a adult female has more than one male partner or spouse ( Worell. 2002. p. 298 ) . They maintained matrilineal families in which sisters and brothers and their kids were the lasting occupants. The matrilinear compounds in this society are called tarawads. Each tarawad is headed up by a senior adult female. Traditionally adult females in Nayar civilizations hold determination doing powers over themselves and their households and are the primary holders of all land and assets owned and maintained within the household line. ( Malayali. 2005 ) Work force. traditionally. were free from these restraints or the restraints of conventional farmings due to the necessity of being free to go forth for intents of war but. freedom came at the cost of holding really small political. societal. or economical power or stature within the community. In fact. the lone responsibility work forces are expected to make full at place is to develop their nephews and see their married womans long plenty to infuse them. and of class to demo up and claim paternity when necessary. ( Moore. 1985 )
In decision. the Nayars of India has a alone life style. Turning up and life in a topographic point such as America. where the civilizations are similar in many ways makes me really interested in civilizations such as theirs.
Mencher. Joan. Encyclopedia of World Culture. 1996. Gale Group Inc. Worell. Judith. Encyclopedia of Women and Gender: Differences and the Impact on Society. Vol. 1. 2002. Acdemic Press. Ann Arbor. MI
Moore. M. A. A New Look At the Nayar Travad. MAN. Royal Anthropological Institute Of Great Britain and Ireland 20 ( 3 ) . 523-541. ( 1985. September ) . Nowak B. & A ; Laird. P. Cultural Anthropology. 2010. Bridgepoint Education. Inc. 2010. San Diego. CA. Pannikar. K. M. Some Aspects of Nayar Life. the Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute Of
Great Britain and Ireland. 48. 254-293. ( 1918. July ) .