, Research Paper

The Lust For Power: How Politicss and Personal Relations Become One


Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
Writers Experience
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
Writers Experience
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
Writers Experience
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

The narratives of the Bible uncover a form of? ups and downs? for the

state of Israel. A period of prosperity, fidelity and fearing God would

about ever be followed by a period of destitution, anarchy and devotion.

This repeating rhythm can be linked to political authorization, and the degree of

separation of political authorization from other influences. The successful

battle for release under the leading of Moses and the glorious conquering

of Canaan under Joshua instilled a fresh zephyr of hope and a renewed religion in

God in the state of Israel. Guided by God, the state of Israel met with

unprecedented success as they journeyed to the promised land. During this clip,

political authorization among the Israelites rested in the custodies of patriarchs, or

outstanding members within the folks. These work forces were righteous figures of

authorization, chosen by God, to take His people and to learn His ways. The success

that swept over the Israelites was ephemeral, nevertheless, and for the following two

hundred old ages the people of Israel struggled against neighbouring folk. The

new coevals of Israelites? knew neither the Lord nor what he did for Israel?

( Judges 2:10 ) . They began to? make evil in the eyes of the Lord? by idolizing

other Gods and prosecuting in assorted sexual activities. To salvage His people from

their enemies and from their? evil ways, ? God? raised up? Judgess to deliver them

( Judges 2:16 ) . These alleged Judgess had the political authorization vested in

them to take the people of Israel and to salvage them from their wickednesss. They

mobilized the people of Israel against invasions of the folks all around them.

At this clip, the state of Israel was nil more than a loose alliance

of 12 folks. Israel had no cardinal authorization, which meant no integrity, no

organisation and no power. During the period of the Judgess, there was no demand

for a cardinal authorities, because the people of Israel were able to support their

tribal districts efficaciously against bordering peoples. Whenever there was a

menace from a adjacent folk, God sent a justice to take the Hebrewss against

their enemies. As this epoch came to an terminal, nevertheless, the Hebrewss were faced

with a much larger job & # 8211 ; the Philistines & # 8217 ; military menace. As the

Hebrewss were extinguishing all the little powers around them, the Philistines,

with their Fe implements and organisation, were going an emergent menace.

In order to protect themselves from the looming danger of the Philistine ground forces,

the Israelites asked for a male monarch to supply fusion, organisation and power

for the state of Israel. God granted their petition, and Samuel reluctantly

appointed Saul in God & # 8217 ; s name. The male monarch & # 8217 ; s map was to supply leading and

to unite the people against their enemies. However, the duties,

powers and privileges that came with kingship overpoweringly went beyond the

range of political relations. The personal relationships between the male monarch and his people

became progressively involved with authorities. With the rise of the monarchy

came a definite alteration in political authorization. As Israel changed from the

period of Judgess to the period of the monarchy, political relations and political authorization

became progressively associated with personal relationships. In the period of

the sovereign, the separation between political relations and personal affairs was no longer

delineated as it was before, and political relations and personal dealingss became


& # 8220 ; Whenever the Lord raised up a justice for them, he was with the justice and

saved them out of the custodies of their enemies every bit long as the justice lived & # 8221 ; ( Judges

2:18 ) . God sent Judgess to take the Israelites in the procedure of consolidating

tribal countries and defence against organized enemies. The Judgess led the

Hebrewss into conflict and besides served as reminders to the people to obey the

word of God. It is gratuitous to state so, that the Judgess were leaders of the

Hebrewss during despairing times. The chief ground why a clear differentiation

between personal dealingss and political authorization during the period of the

Judgess was possible, was that there was no sequence of Judgess. God chose

Judgess to take Israel against its enemies merely when they were in demand of

leading and counsel, and in making so, there was no power battle or? battle

for the crown. ? There was no specific individual? following in line? to take the

Hebrewss, because the lone thing of import to them at that clip was supporting

themselves against neighbouring powers. It was of no concern to the Hebrewss

who the leader was, every bit long as the leader was competent and effectual. Another

feature of the Judgess & # 8217 ; regulation that compensated for the separation of

political relations and personal affairs was the brevity of their leading. Whereas a

sovereign would stay swayer of the land after conquering, the Judgess served merely as

a kind of? impermanent alleviation? for the state of Israel. After carry throughing their

assignment as leaders of the Israelites against their antagonists during times

of exigency, they would humble themselves before God and before the Israelites.

It is clear that the Judgess possessed political authorization over the Hebrewss,

but seldom did they let personal affairs and relationships to interfere with

authorities. Merely in the instance of Samson did his personal relationships and

desires come in the manner of political authorization. There were 12s Judgess in

all, but the Bible pays most of its attending to three of the 12: Deborah,

Gideon, and Samson.

Deborah, the lone adult female leader of the Judgess, won undisputed regard.

She commanded Barak, boy of Abinoam, to conflict Sisera, the commanding officer of the

ground forces of King Jabin. Throughout the narrative of her victory, non one time was Deborah & # 8217 ; s

personal dealingss mentioned. It can be assumed so, that Deborah kept her

personal dealingss separate from her political leading, and was focused on

one thing and one thing merely & # 8211 ; the licking of Jabin and the Canaanites.

Forty old ages of peace ensued after Deborah & # 8217 ; s military triumph, and so

the people of Israel once more began to fall into wickedness and were overcome one time once more,

this clip by the Midianites. God raised up Gideon to direct the people of

Israel against the Midianites. Gideon defeated the Midianites, and in making so,

was offered an chance to be king. However, Gideon declined the chance

to govern declaring? I will non govern over you, nor will my boy regulation over you. The

Lord will govern over you? ( Judges 8:23 ) . The deficiency of sequence of Judgess is

analogue to the separation of political relations and personal dealingss. There was

obviously no power battle among the Hebrewss, because even when offered the

power to govern, Gideon declined. There was no battle for sequence of leading

because there was no sequence of leading.

The narrative of Samson can be seen as the passage from the period of

Judgess to the period of the monarchy. Samson, although the most talented of the

Judgess, had a tragic defect ; he was pitifully unable to command his lecherousness for adult females.

Samson & # 8217 ; s personal desire for adult females affected his ability to ground, and therefore

hindered his ability to take the people of Israel. With his great physical

strength and hot pique, Samson single-handedly pushed back the Philistines –

more by accident than by purpose. . He was finally betrayed and ruined by

a adult female due to his rambunctious abandon and careless brush with Delilah. God

intended Samson for great things. Of all the Judgess, he was the lone one to be

announced by an angel before he was born ( Judges 13:3 ) . He was given

supernatural abilities, and his life was specially devoted to God. However,

despite all these advantages given to him at birth, his unmanageable desire

for adult female destroyed him. His personal dealingss destroyed his chances of

/ & gt ;

going a great leader among the Israelites. Samson & # 8217 ; s desire for adult females

overpowered his desire to present the Israelites out of the custodies of the

Philistines, and this led to his tragic ruin. The narrative of Samson mistily

foreshadows the connexion between political relations and personal dealingss in the period

of the sovereign. It acts as a nexus fall ining a period when political relations and personal

dealingss are clearly defined and separate, and a period when they are

indistinct and inseparable.

Approaching the terminal of the period of the Judgess, the Israelites began to

notice that virtually every other state had a male monarch, while Isarael was nil

more than an confederation of scattered folks. The lifting power of the Philistines

and other at hand menaces to Israelite security impelled the Israelites to inquire

for a male monarch. A male monarch offered two advantages: foremost, a male monarch would supply cardinal

authorities, hence supplying integrity and organisation ; and back, since a male monarch

would usually be succeeded by his boies, the state did non hold a crisis of

leading every its leader became old. God despairingly granted the want of

His people and gave them a male monarch. Samuel anointed Saul as male monarch of Israel, and

the people were satisfied. Military success went manus in manus with conveying the

folks together in one united state, but when the desire for sequence of the

Crown came into drama, personal dealingss and authorities become one.

Saul was successful as male monarch of Israel until David proved to be a menace

to the Crown. After David defeated Goliath of the Philistines, the people sang

aloud? Saul has slain his 1000s, and David his 10s of 1000s? ( 1 Samuel

18:7 ) . Saul therefore became covetous of David, for he could non stand to be 2nd

best in a state he calls his ain. From that point thenceforth, Saul & # 8217 ; s political

authorization and leading was no longer concentrated on the good of the state

and the public assistance of his people, but instead he focused his attempts on? maintaining a

covetous oculus on David? ( 1 Samuel 18:11 ) , and David? remained his enemy the remainder

of his yearss? ( 1 Samuel 18:29 ) . Saul spent the remainder of his yearss seeking for

David in efforts to kill him so that he may recover the regard of his people,

and in making so killed many guiltless bystanders that got in his manner. This roseola

indignation of green-eyed monster and personal hate for David was critically associated with

political relations. While Saul could hold directed his attempts toward the improvement of

Israel, he was after personal benefit, and this led to his eventual prostration.

David, holding unconditioned regard for Saul, spared his life twice, and therefore

allowed Saul to foster pursue him. Saul finally dies, nevertheless, and David is

made male monarch over the house of Judah.

Although David & # 8217 ; s reign was better than that of Saul & # 8217 ; s, he excessively had

jobs. Ish-Bosheth is the menace to the throne this clip, while Ish-

Bosheth & # 8217 ; s general Abner is a menace to him. Abner slept with Saul & # 8217 ; s courtesan,

hence openly doing a claim on the Crown. In David & # 8217 ; s clip, adult females acted as

political symbols. Abner & # 8217 ; s kiping with Saul & # 8217 ; s concubine suggested that he had

his eyes on going king himself. In chase of David, Abner killed the

brother of Joab, David & # 8217 ; s general. As a consequence Joab had a personal blood feud

against Abner and was after his life. When Ish-Bosheth was murdered, and it was

evident that David was traveling to go the following male monarch, Joab murdered Abner. It

is non hard to see that this? soap opera? of events is due to the fact that

personal dealingss and political relations were interrelated. Either personal dealingss

effected a political alteration, or political relations effected a alteration in personal dealingss.

After David is crowned male monarch of Israel, he had jobs of the same nature.

David, seeing the tempting Bathsheba, wanted her for his ain instantly. He

blatantly disregarded the fact that she had a hubby, Uriah, and took her for

his married woman, holding Uriah killed in the procedure. This corrupt usage of political

authorization demonstrates how political authorization and personal dealingss are linked.

David & # 8217 ; s boy, Absalom, besides had his eyes on the throne. He led a confederacy

against his male parent by going all over Israel winning the favour of the people,

and he besides slept with his male parent & # 8217 ; s courtesans in public. Absalom publically

slept with his male parent & # 8217 ; s courtesans for political grounds ; it made clear his

claim to the throne. Hebrewss who held back their commitment thought male parent

and boy would accommodate their differences, knew now that the breach was

permanent ; they had to take a side. Again sexual authority and sexual dealingss

are acutely tied in with political relations. David was finally confronted with the

fact that he must capture or destruct his boy Absalom. When he found out that

his soldiers killed Absalom, he mourned profoundly. His love for his boy collided

with his effectivity as a leader. David wept so overly that it

demoralized the military personnels who had risked their lives for him and the state of


When David & # 8217 ; s clip was over, one time once more there was a power battle for

sequence of the throne. This clip it was between the boies of David, Adonijah

and Solomon. Adonijah took inaugural and set himself up as male monarch, but Bathsheba,

David & # 8217 ; s favourite married woman, and Nathan the prophesier, ? pulled a few strings? to procure

Solomon & # 8217 ; s claim of the Crown. Due to the attempts of Bathsheba and Nathan,

Solomon was crowned male monarch. This? pulling of strings? demonstrates how personal

dealingss may breed enduring impacts on political relations. If Bathseba had non been

David & # 8217 ; s favourite married woman, and Nathan had non been David & # 8217 ; s trusted adviser, Adonijah

may hold been crowned male monarch of Israel alternatively of Solomon. Solomon besides used

adult females to his advantage ; he had seven 100 married womans and three hundred courtesans.

Most of his married womans were princesses of nearby folks, so it can be inferred that

his matrimonies were politically motivated. He was married to Pharaoh & # 8217 ; s girl,

and had an confederation with Pharaoh. The narrative of Solomon & # 8217 ; s sequence is as

complicated and as involved with personal dealingss as his predecessors.

As Israel developed from a alliance of folks into a great

monarchial power, a noteworthy alteration took topographic point. As the state of Israel moved

from the period of Judgess to the period of the monarchy, political relations and political

authorization became progressively associated with personal affairs and personal

dealingss. Personal dealingss began to impact political relations and political authorization,

and in bend, political relations affected personal dealingss. This alteration occurred because

the features of leading changed. During the period of the Judgess,

there was no sequence of power, and because there was no sequence of power,

no 1 was contending for it. The Judgess were sent to take the Hebrewss in

times of demand and exigency. Their leading was merely passing, and therefore non

one of them were able to derive an extortionate sum of political power. When

the period of the monarchy was steadfastly in topographic point, nevertheless, there was a system of

sequence of power. Even before the male monarch muttered his last words, there were

peopleeagerly waiting in line to take his topographic point. And if that wasn & # 8217 ; t plenty,

people were plotting against the male monarch in hopes of wining the throne, even

his ain boies. This characteristic of the period of the monarchy allowed for the commixture

and intertwining of political relations and personal dealingss. The usage of adult females as

symbols of power and laterality became abundant as male monarchs challenged the

prospective replacements, and as prospective replacements challenged the male monarchs.

Events took topographic point that can be compared to episodes of Television soap operas or Melrose

Topographic point. Politicss and personal dealingss became interconnected, and above all else,

the underlying ground was power. As people began to crave for power, for wealth,

and for acknowledgment, the association of the two became at hand, and the

separation of the two became impossible.

Topics: , , ,


I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out