Power-The Crucible Vs 1984 Essay, Research Paper
The Girls Power in The Crucible and the Inner Party s Power in & # 8220 ; 1984 & # 8243 ;
At face value, the constructs discussed in Orwell s & # 8220 ; 1984 & # 8243 ; are far removed from those in Miller s play The Crucible. One is a not-so optimistic position of the hereafter, while the other demonstrates a instead low point in early American history. However, upon farther scrutiny, there is grounds that the impression of deputation of power is slightly similar between the two.
Compared to that of the misss, the agencies by which the Crown of power is obtained by the Inner Party is equivocal, and outside the range of the novel. Orwell s purpose is to concentrate non on how the opinion group additions power, but on the actions that the group is capable of executing. In fact, two major ends of the Party are to suppress the whole surface of the Earth and to snuff out & # 8230 ; the possibility of independent idea. The Party wants entire, and non partial, domination over the full population, and therefore, to be able to command everyone and everything. In the timeframe of the novel, the Party is really close to carry throughing this. In The Crucible it is, nevertheless, rather different. Miller references that vain enjoyment or anything similar to it was forbidden, and that clip off merely meant that the people must concentrate even more upon supplication. The Puritan society, based on rigorous spiritual rules, did non let any sort of personal enjoyment or freedom. The restraints placed on the misss by this demanding society can be considered at least a part to, if non the chief ground for, the misss bizarre behaviour.
In 1984, the Inner Party has control of the people from the beginning, and is non afraid to enforce its sense of justness on the remainder of the population. The same is true that, one time they recognize the extent of their control, the misss in The Crucible demonstrate their newfound power. Proctor, speaking about Abigail, says that the miss s a saint now, and that it is non easy to turn out she s fraud. Abigail, every bit good as the other misss, is extremely regarded by the community for making what appears to be God s work. Proctor, nevertheless, knows that she is doing accusals out of malice and retribution, but has small grounds to turn out his instance. At first the misss action were done out of rebellion against an over-bearing society, but as more and more are accused, the misss start to seek retaliation on the grownups in their lives who have oppressed or angered them and who,
until now, they were bound to obey unfailingly. Elizabeth tells Proctor that Abigail thinks to kill ( her ) and so to take ( her ) topographic point. Now that Abigail has the ability to move as a practical one-man tribunal system, Elizabeth fears that she will take out personal scores on her, in order to acquire near to Proctor. Here, the misss justification for their actions alterations form to one more serious than earlier. They now have the power and support from the community to impeach others of witchery, and so they act the manner that most kids would move ; they use all of their power to acquire what they want.
There are similarities between the two plants in the acquisition and usage, every bit good as the loss or weakening of power. In both 1984 and The Crucible there is, for the most portion, a individual individual that challenges the members in power. In 1984, it is Winston, who commits the ultimate thoughtcrime against the Party, and therefore inquiries the authorization of the Inner Party. Winston begins a diary, the really purpose of which is punishable by
decease. Although it is apparent that he can non truly dispute the power of the Party, he attempts to weaken it, put on the lining his ain life in the procedure. In The Crucible, Proctor is really much like Winston in 1984. He knows that Abby ll charge lechery on ( him ) and that she may destroy ( him ) with it, if he accuses her of slaying. Although puting his repute in serious hazard, Proctor decides to face Abigail in tribunal. He does this because he is the lone 1 with adequate bravery to dispute the misss on their power to impeach. He realizes that he is seting himself at hazard, but continues to seek to uncloak justness and fade out the power that the misss hold over the town.
The mass craze brought about by fright of witchery in The Crucible leads to an turbulence in people & # 8217 ; s sense of right and incorrect and thereby obscures the class of justness. In this clip of confusion, mere kids are given the power to judge the grownups of the community. Being in a unfertile Puritan environment, the misss seek more freedom, and, given the power to obtain it, they lash out against the grownups and impeach them of witchery. This maltreatment of power corresponds with that of the Inner Party in 1984. In my sentiment, both of these are illustrations that serve as a warning against how power is delegated in a society, and effects affecting its abuse. That is because it holds true that he who has the power to make great things besides has the power to perpetrate atrociousnesss.