To understand what categorization is in the prison system. I feel we have to look at the history of it every bit good. In the nineteenth century categorization was barely used. It was chiefly used to command the prison system populations. Thingss like age. gender and figure of discourtesies were used to sort them. During the medical theoretical account old ages of the prison system. they used medical ground to sort inmates. This helped command the mentally sick from regular wrongdoers. It wasn’t until late that prison system started classifies inmates to better command the system and have a better impact on the inmate themselves. The “get tough on crime” old ages strained the prison system and its population. It caused overcrowding and increased the hazard of force in the prison system. Lawsuits and became common topographic point for the provinces and a new attack was needed to sort inmates to better command the population. Today’s theoretical account is called the nonsubjective categorization system. The system uses intensive analysis. diagnosing. and forecast for each captive to sort their inmates.

This system helps cut down the degree of force. flight effort and self-destructions every bit good as assaults and other serous violent offense in the prison systems. ( US section of Justice. 2003 ) The presentence study provides a instance director or instance worker with valuable information needed to sort an inmate. This study is broken down into several parts. The offense portion list the brief history of the condemnable discourtesy. victim impact. obstructor of justness. credence of duty. degree of calculation and the wrongdoers behavior. The 2nd portion trades with the offender’s condemnable history. The 3rd portion list the offender’s features. Part vitamin D lists the sentencing options. which include any supplication understanding options made by the wrongdoer or prosecutor’s office. Part vitamin E lists any factors that may bespeak that a sentence of a different sort or of a different length from one within the applicable guideline would be more appropriate under all the fortunes. This information can be used by the instance director to assist sort the topics because it gives a factual study about the wrongdoer.

It lists the discourtesy for which he or she is sentences. It show the offender condemnable history. It besides can demo what characteristics the wrongdoer has that helped him or her commit a offense in the first topographic point. Example the wrongdoer has a bad history with drug usage. Or the wrongdoer has a history of force. This information can assist find which rehabilitation classes the wrongdoer has entree to. The study besides can demo the instance director what the justice or tribunals thought was appropriate for the wrongdoer. ( US tribunals web page. 2012 ) . Most provinces and federal prison system have different degree of prison. They range from minimal security to super max security. Minimum security prisons are for non-violent wrongdoers. white colour offenses. counterfeit and simple drug charges. Inmates are giving more freedom in minimal security prison. Medium security prisons are for semi-violent wrongdoers. Their offense scope from simple/ minor assault. major larceny with longer sentences. drug charges with longer sentence.

Maximum security prison is for violent wrongdoers. slayings. raper. or other offense that are considered highly violent. Inmates who become classified as prison pack members are sent to maximal security prison. Some provinces have a higher degree of security which is called super-max. but for some provinces maximum is their highest degree. For the provinces that merely hold maximal prison. so their maximal security prison are where they house their most utmost wrongdoer. The wrongdoers with long sentence who are highly violent and present a hazard to the prison population. The last degree in some provinces and the federal prison system is super-max. Super-max is most utmost wrongdoers those who pose the most hazard to other inmate and staff. They normally have long prison sentence. Most have committed a violent offense while in prison or belong to a prison pack. ( Gendreau. P. Goggin. C. 1999 ) The psychological effects of prison sentence on inmate differ from inmate to inmate. Most adjust to their prison system.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Those in minimal prison tend to coup with their captivity otherwise than those in higher degrees of security prisons. Some provinces like Illinois have a minimal security prison where the inmates live for the most parts without force. This prison holds rigorous ordinance on which wrongdoers can function clip at that place. But this prison is based on rehabilitation and most freed inmate is able to return to their normal life without a alteration in their mental province. The first feeling inmates feel is a loss of control over their life. They are forced to release their freedom. The control over their day-to-day picks is gone and this becomes really painful for inmates to manage. After a longer period of imprisonment inmates become dependent on the construction of the prison system. They develop what is called institutionalization. There is a lessened degree of self-worth and value that inmates feel from being incarcerated. Inmates develop a degree of societal backdown and isolation. Some show a marks of clinical depression.

A survey done by McCorkle shows that most inmates chose to remain in their cell alternatively of venture out to go victims in the paces and other unsafe parts of the prison. Younger inmates tend to decrease their opportunities of going a victim with aggressive behaviour while older inmates use turning away. ( Gendreau. P. Goggin. C. 1999 ) Some people feel as if being sentence to prison is like traveling to a school of offense. They province prison are engendering evidences for offense. Some believe that the longer the sentence the easy or higher the degree of recidivism is. They province that while prison destroys psychological and emotional wellbeing of inmates it gives manner to their credence of offense or force. One positive component that takes topographic point within prison civilization is the work force plans that most provinces have. They give occupation accomplishments to inmates who before their sentence had no employable accomplishments for the community to which they lived in. The work force plans besides install self-pride and a sense of belonging.

They give an inmate a manner out of offense when they return to their community and the accomplishments to maintain them off from offense. Most work plans besides employ societal accomplishment categories and get bying accomplishments categories. These plans have been successful in about all provinces for inmates who want to alter. Vermont has a work force plans that teaches wonts of the head. These categories show inmate why they are in prison and what can assist them remain off from prison when they get out. The plan petition that the inmates portion what they have learned with other inmates that are non in the plan. This can alter the civilization of prison and give more dignity to all inmates that want a alteration. The plan uses a three of influence. They province that school. work and cell units assist alter the degree of force and recidivism amongst inmates. ( US section of Justice Webpage. 2009 ) The female population in the rectification systems has grown over the old ages. In the 1980s the per centum of adult females in the prison system accounted for about 4 per centum to it accounts for about 6. 4 per centum. The effects on female captives can be different than the consequence males face. Male prisons are set up to form power for inmate where adult females inmates tend to develop a household tie web within the prison system.

The development of assumed household takes topographic point. Female inmates sometime take on the function as household members. One female possibly called the grandma of the group while the other is considered the female parent. Homosexuality is seen otherwise in male prison compared to female prison. Male captives use sex as a manner of power where adult females use it to animate a degree of acquaintance. The strong adult females take on the function as dikes and carry themselves as if they were a adult male. Were the weaker adult females tend to be more femme and carry themselves as the girlfriend. Fewer adult females inmate show marks of aggression so work forces do. Even though the effects of being incarcerated are the same for adult females and work forces. adult females do non perpetrate self-destruction every bit frequently as male inmates do. They do non seek out the demand for protective detention every bit frequently as male inmates. Both work forces and adult females have ends of acquiring out of prison. Female prisons have different type of work groups. Some work groups working on maternity and being a better supplier for their kids.

While male workgroups teach accomplishments that they can utilize to be employed when they get out of prison. Female inmate tend to non organize packs per fact the shooting companies in female prison do non what to cover with the jobs packs bring to the system ( Westmarland. N. 2009 ) . The separation of a female parent from her household can be traumatic to the female parent and kids. Prison systems tend to hold plans to assist the female inmate trade with the separation of their kids. Particular trials are giving to female inmate with kids. Female besides take on the feeling of angry guilt and resentment when they are separated from their kids. There are a batch of plans that are used alternatively of probation and captivity. Programs like work release let an wrongdoer to still keep a occupation while holding his or hers freedom restricted. Other plans like house apprehension. electronic monitoring and twenty-four hours coverage plans cut down the cost to the revenue enhancement remunerators and still command an wrongdoer. Mediation and damages began in Canada in the 1970s and has been adopted by the United States. The plan allows the victim and wrongdoer to run into under the control of a instance worker or community appointed worker to seek and settle their job outside of the tribunals custodies.

This plan has been a successful tool in the justness plan and is a great tool for State Attorneys and constabularies officer when grip neighbour disputed and junior-grade larceny offense. Community service plans began in the united provinces in 1966 and has grown more in popularity of all time sense. The plan is use a batch in juvenile instance and are considered good option to other type of sentences. They are used when condemnable commit less serious offenses. They range from the cleansing of community Parkss. churches and public roadway to assisting nursing places and other non-profit-making groups with labour.

Day coverage centres allow wrongdoer to stay in their community but necessitate them to look into in to the coverage centre. This aid command the usage of drug and intoxicant for wrongdoer with these types of jobs and still allows them to keep a occupation. Most plans require the wrongdoer to pay a monitoring fee which reduces the cost of this plan to the revenue enhancement remunerators. Day supervising plan are used for non-serious or nonviolent offenses. A plan that the province I live in utilizations is the diversionary plan. This plan requires offender to travel to compulsory intervention categories and is used for drug wrongdoer and intoxicant wrongdoers. Some provinces have diversionary plans where sex wrongdoers who commit non colza sex discourtesy are allowed to acquire intervention for their job. ( Library index web page. 2012 ) Parole in the province and federal system.

The Federal sentencing reform act of 1984 has done away with federal word and has increase the length of prison sentence for federal wrongdoers. Since the act took topographic point the prison population for the federal system is four times higher than it was before the act. States on the other manus let a parole board to find whether an wrongdoer is allowed to return to his or hers community. The federal system requires their wrongdoer to function their full length of sentence behind bars with small option of early release. The provinces have changed the manner they parole wrongdoers over the last few old ages. Some provinces have lessened the supervising of their words while others have stiffened their control of words. The aggressive enforcement of probationers have led to those provinces holding a higher figure of parole misdemeanors and have increase the sending of wrongdoer back into the prison system. Some provinces have done off with the parole board all together and hold merely released their wrongdoer back into the community. The simple fact is parole is need for the justness system to work the manner it does today. In 2003 there were 4. 8 million wrongdoers on some signifier of probation or word.

The populations of inmates in the prison system were about 2. 1 million at the same clip. This reduces the cost of the justness system to the revenue enhancement remunerators and has aid cut down the degree of recidivism. States have started to look at the impact of word and the cost it has on revenue enhancement remunerators. States like Kentucky have stiffened their release policies. Other provinces like Maryland have allowed their probation parole officer to get down transporting pieces and to carry on probe of their wrongdoers. This shows a alteration in the manner province view their probation. parole system. The intent of word is to let go of an wrongdoer back into the community while still curtailing their autonomies and commanding their behaviour. This allows the supervising of an wrongdoer while he or she is reintegrated into the community. This allows offender to hold the support system of the province and can assist cut down recidivism.

The support system can assist an wrongdoer find a occupation. lodging and consulting. One other intent of word is it stop gratuitous imprisonment of an wrongdoer who is non likely to perpetrate any more offenses. Thingss that can do or non do an wrongdoer eligible for word are as follows. The nature of the offense. Remarks made during condemning. The condemnable history of the wrongdoer before and during their sentence. How the wrongdoer manage his or hers last parole release. if that applies. Advancement program upon his or hers release. Representation made to the board by either the wrongdoer. his or hers household and the victims. The behavior of the wrongdoer while they were sentence or incarcerated will be reviewed as good. All the about stated is used to find whether an inmate can be release on word. Parole is a privilege non a right. The right to parole is giving to the wrongdoer when they are sentenced ( indeterminate and determinate ) . but it is still up to the board to find whether or non they can be released. The wrongdoer will more than probably travel in forepart of a parole board of some sort. The board will find whether or non the wrongdoer is released. A parole officer is responsible for measuring the wrongdoer.

The cheque the advancement of a probationer. They can urge the strength of the supervising of the wrongdoer. They can help the wrongdoer with maintain occupations. concern contacts. and household support. The proctor the damages payments that an wrongdoer might hold to do per tribunal order. In some provinces the parole officer can assist the tribunal with pre-sentencing probe and per parole board hearing probe to find if the wrongdoer release is in topographic point. In most provinces if non all the parole officer has the right to collar an probationer. When this takes place the parole officer will hold to register a study saying why the wrongdoer demand to be re-jailed. This study is reviewed in tribunal to see if the wrongdoer has violated his or hers footings of probation or word. There are many pros and cons of word.

I listed a batch of the cons above. The chief pro that I feel the word system has is the fact that it allows an wrongdoer to be released while still being supervised by the province. It allows an wrongdoer to turn out to the community that he or she is ready to be freed. It gives the wrongdoer the support they might necessitate to guarantee they are successful when they are released. It gives the community a sense of protection cognizing that person is released but they are released under some type of control. Parole besides shorten the length of sentence and reduces the cost of runing prison. ( Echie K. 2012 ) Some cons in the system are the simple fact it is a system. Some wrongdoer might utilize the system and so when their term is over they go right back to offense. There is still a high cost of holding a parole system. Some parole systems are under staffed and some wrongdoers are non supervised every bit good as they should be. ( Echie K. 2012 )

Mentions

Echie K. ( 2012 ) The Roles And Duties Of The Parole Or Probation Officer In The Criminal
Justice Field. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. articlecity. com/articles/legal/article_1037. shtml Library index web page. ( 2012 ) . Sentencing alternate sentencing. Retrieved from
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. libraryindex. com/pages/2553/Sentencing-ALTERNATIVE-
SENTENCING. hypertext markup language
Gendreau. P. Goggin. C. ( 1999 ) . The effects of prison sentences on recidivism. Retrieved from
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. prisonpolicy. org/scans/e199912. htm
US tribunals web page. ( 2012 ) The presentence study. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. rake. uscourts. gov/rip/presentence/presentencereport/presentencereport. html US Department of Justice web page. ( Sep 2009 ) Passage and wrongdoer work force development





bulletin. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //static. nicic. gov/Library/023065. pdf US Department of Justice web page. ( June 25 2003 ) Findingss in prison categorization and hazard
appraisal. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. jfa associates. com/publications/pcras/10_ Findings_2003. pdf
Westmarland. N. ( 2009 ) . Womans and the Criminal Justice System. International Criminal Law
Review. 9 ( 2 ) . 442-443. doi:10. 1163/157181209X43029


x

Hi!
I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out