Prisoner of the Inquisition I believe the author begins with a brief introduction to the era and historical perspective at the time, to introduce the reader to the story and allow them to delve into the historical knowledge. She wants the reader to know the background to the plot and for them to understand it. The climate of fear in which the Holy Inquisition bestowed upon people is relevant to this story as we get a glimpse of the horror it can lead to early on in the book. So early in fact that in the first chapter Czarina says “the Holy Inquisition brought fear and suspicion to our town.
This shows how they’re viewed from a person’s perspective at the time rather than in a historical context. They are expected to be respected and yet have respect for no one. This is shown when Father Bestial admitted to spying on Don Vincent and his family in the Don’s own home. However at the end, it’s shown that like most novels, movies etc; Love conquers all. Back in 1 5th century Europe they’re are many differences compared to the 21st century. Many historians view the 15th century as the great age of discovery, not unlike the 21st century.
Some of these differences include: – Religious Differences- During the 1 5th century, there was only a handful of dominating religions, these included Catholicism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Today in the 21st century, these same religions continue to be popular; however now they’re more widely distributed. Alternative religions such as atheism, the belief that god doesn’t exist, have grown greatly. This religion would’ve been thoroughly rejected in the 1 5th century. This is a key theme running throughout the book. * Law and Government- In the 1 5th century, dictatorships and social hierarchies determined ruling overspent bodies.
Typically there was one ruling king who delegated political responsibilities to others on a regular basis, however governmental decisions were made largely at the kings whim. Nowadays, democracy is one of the more popular forms of government, this is a more equal way to rule as the citizens have a say in the * Electrical Goods- Obviously in the 15th century people never country’s running. Had toasters, pods, mobile phones, Wig’s or any other form of electricity as it was invented many years later. They had to live simple lives unlike children today.
In the summer of 1490, Czarina is a childish, small minded, selfish little girl who has been mollycoddled her entire life. Myself personally, took an instant dislike to her early on in the novel when she treats the beggar as if he was a dirty creature that shouldn’t have the pleasure of her touch. She could’ve gave him some money, its not like she hasn’t got enough, she probably had enough money to buy him and his family a house, but no instead she got him killed. She is a stubborn character and has a guilty conscience throughout the novel. She is an attention seeker, and I really do not like her one bit.
I feel that people always gave her the benefit of the doubt, even when she wasn’t worthy of it. However, she also seems like a strong willed woman and very headstrong. This is proven when she finds out Barstool© is getting tortured, she runs to him and demands his release when no one else will do something. When near mother Is laying, seen doesn’t take Into account now near mother is feeling; instead she Just thinks of herself and acts selfishly. When someone is on their deathbed, your supposed to offer words of comfort and act like a lunatic afterwards.
Czarina doesn’t though, she flung herself over her mothers body, ignores he pleas of the woman who later sacrifices her life for her, and begs her mother not to leave her when it very obviously is out of her control. She later regrets this however when she is in the convent and realized she isn’t the innocent angel she thinks she is. She does have her heart in the right place most of the time though, it just seems like she doesn’t know how to voice her opinions without the implications hurting or reflecting badly on her.
I would become her friend however as I believe she is in need off person who will listen to her thoughts and have faith in her. By he end of the book Czarina has changed by a considerable amount for the better. She has accepted her past mistakes and taken full credit for them, this has made her more respected by others. By sending her to the convent it taught her how to respect, care and accept others that she would’ve turned her nose up at before. If the reformed Czarina was in the church with the beggar, then she would’ve gave him money, not left him to die.
Life for the lower class in the 1 5th century was extremely hard, as they, unlike the wealthy, had to work hard for their livelihood. Usually the wealthy people offered the or people protection in exchange for living and working on their land. Peasants worked hard to cultivate the land and produce goods, however they were heavily taxed and required to relinquish much of what they harvested. The contrast between rich and poor was much more obvious then than now. Nowadays people give to charities that help the underprivileged, back then if you didn’t earn, you didn’t eat, and then you die.
In the 1 5th century the poor were expected to work until the day they dropped dead. The rich had no respect for the poor and didn’t care for their state of mind or financial situation. They Just wanted their crops harvested, and their land kept clean. I imagine the poor felt helpless, as this was one of the few ways they could earn money. My sorrows lie with the poor, how could there be so much poverty and yet so much wealth? The rich had the power to stop it at didn’t. It’s like the Secret Millionaire and Robin Hood, take from the rich and give to the poor.
How can anyone sympathies with someone who has too much? Saul earns his wealth by the path of the sea. Captain Cosmos’s passing and his hidden wealth in the peacock Jacket also helped add to it. He had “lots of Florins, Lions, Reels, Ducats, Doubloons and Silver and Gold coins… ” Due to this he “… Had a fortune in his hands. ” It’s not planned for Cosmos to die, but I believe that when his final act was reaching for the Jacket, he knew Saul would get it. Soul’s life changes dramatically when he gets the money.
He’s able to travel to Lass Conches and “seek revenge” on Don and family. In other, less fortunate circumstances he would’ve had to hitchhike in uncomfortable surroundings, eat scraps of food and dress in scraps of clothes. However with his fortune, he dines in luxury, purchase nobleman’s clothing ND dark clothing, and buys a beautiful, strong horse. Money is so valued in both the 1 5th century and 21st century because you can usually tell how well Off person is Day looking at tenet appearance.
It makes people addle to Duty transportation, Ana In Columbus position, fund an expedition. For him it was so important as he had spent the best part of his life leading towards this moment. He didn’t have the money himself, thus making himself dependent on the sponsorship of the King and Queen. It would’ve helped him pay for creamers, supplies, sail masters, a ship etc. The inquisition is a terribly unfair organization set up by King Ferdinand II and Queen Isabella of Castle, basically to segregate Spain.
One major reason as to why it was unjust is the way it extracted information from people, it used the following methods and more: – * Starvation * Forcing the accused to consume and hold vast quantities of water or other fluids * Heaped burning coals on parts of the body * Strapped – Painful dislocation * The Rack- Arms and legs could be torn off, again dislocation * Heated metal pincers, heated iron slippers worn on feet * Burned at the stake They charged people automatically without any evidence to convict them, in today’s society this would never be aloud without a legal trial.
In my opinion Father Bestiary’s character is a cruel and brutal man that truly believes he is doing the right thing for the world. When convicting or torturing people he shows no mercy and this has lead to widespread fear of him. The way they treated Barstool© is specifically horrific because he was Just an innocent boy, a “simpleton”. He is specifically targeted because he cannot understand the questions the Inquisition are asking him. They SE him, a human being, as an emotional trigger for other people to come forward. It’s later said in the novel that he never smiled again after that day.
They have ruined numerous people’s lives and took many more. I’m ashamed to have shared the earth with them. I believe the reason Saul likes to be on the sea is because he feels like he’s working towards a goal; it may also be because he needs to take his mind off the fact that he is alone as both parent’s are dead. It’s a completely new experience for him, so like any young boy he is eager to learn. He loves the way the sea can entice people into vying and becoming transfixed by it, yet in the crash of a wave it can also be a deadly force.
Saul later compares this to a woman. Captain Cosmos is one person who has a huge impact on Saul. He depended on him to keep a lookout for him, and confided in him when he couldn’t to anyone else. I think there was a mutual respect between them both. Piñata, I believe, also helps Saul to mature and grow up quickly; as he expects him to do the work of a grown up, this teaches Saul to be resistant take care of himself. Saul also mentions that when he first felt responsible for the welfare of is “crazy captain”, that was also “the day when I left my boyhood behind… Don Vintner’s reaction to the torture of Barstool© is firstly rebellious towards Father Bestial, and then when Father Bestial deals the final blow in stating that his own family are under scrutiny, he is outraged. He attempts to defend Barstool© by claiming he is a “simpleton” and “only a boy’. You wouldn’t expect so much compassion from a magistrate to a servant boy usually. He may have thought of Bartholomew as ten son nee never AAA n , tons Is winy nee Tough so nard Tort NV to De released. However although he rebels against the decision, his backlash is nothing compared to when Czarina got “assaulted”.
It’s ironic, how in one circumstance he can be so quick to Judge and brutal, yet in another only months later he can be so helpless and complacent. This shows the reader how much his position in society has been altered with the arrival of the Inquisition. Lorenz sees this and proclaims “as magistrate, surely you have more power, more rights, than the ordinary people! ” this has changed as he is no longer getting preferential treatment. He’s on the same social wavelength as the “ordinary people”. I believe immediately after the beggar mans hanging, Czarina starts to feel remorseful.
This is why she helps the wife until her dying days. Saul also mentions, as he believes that Lorenz and baby have died, that he felt a feeling of “horror and self – disgust”. He got what he sought after, but quickly realized he did not want this fate, unfortunately it was too late. The dreadful outcomes both Czarina and Saul share are Czarina basically was responsible for the eventual death of Soul’s father. I dislike the way in the book Saul managed to forgive the woman that was responsible for his ether’s death, fall in love with her, try to kill her, and then save her life.
I think that’s very unrealistic. However the storyline doesn’t go the way I would plan it, therefore I believe that they’re binned together so closely because when they see each other at the court, theirs this small spark of recognition but only the reader knows the reason. It’s not a forbidden love, Just a twisted, illogical love. I think Beatrice swaps places with her niece Czarina because she believes Czarina can have a life with Saul, a family, a home whereas she will be going back to where she ill spend the rest of her life.
I’m not suggesting she didn’t like her life at the convent, I mean she would rather her niece live a long life that die young lest we forget that Czarina isn’t yet even twenty years of age. Beatrice is a nun as well; I imagine that it would be an example of maybe eternal peace to her, the idea of heaven. She doesn’t recant as she knows she’s innocent, she doesn’t want her last action on earth to be a lie. She doesn’t want to confirm the Inquisition’s accusation anyway; she Just wants to die free, betrothed to nothing nor no one. This may place a seed of doubt in people’s minds. “Why didn’t she recant? ‘Why put herself through the pain, she was going to die anyway. Why not die painlessly? ” People may have then started to think deeper into the actions of the Inquisition, including the King and Queen. I believe her sacrifice was one of love and bravery. She was a sort of martyr in my opinion. She ends her own life so her niece can be free, yet she also does it as the Inquisition won’t trouble the family anymore as they believe that the entire family is dead, beside the nun who we know is now dead. Therefore Czarina is now free to live in ace, I believe that Czarina was neither worthy nor unworthy of Beatnik’s sacrifice.
Nobody should be put to death for something they believe in and in Czarina’s case, not unlike many, she was innocent. However some of her past actions reflected poorly on her. These include the beginning of the novel, the killing that started the whole chain of events; the murder of Soul’s father, the tattling of the two prostitutes and the treatment of her own mother on her deathbed. But naivety and childishness give no reason to De sent to eaten. I believe the prologue is also used as the epilogue because the first time you read it, our unsure of what relevance this has to the plot, the characters.
Whereas at the end, you’re familiar with the story behind the words, therefore you have a mutual understanding of them. When I first read it, I didn’t feel much empathy towards the victim. For the simple reason that I didn’t know who she was or what was going on. However the last time I read it, I could visualize what was happening, I could imagine the scene and the anguish that the people were going through. When I realized it was Beatrice, it Just increased the range if emotions I was feeling. Anger, hurt, sadness.
Now that I know and understand the circumstances which she was killed in, it changed my perspective greatly Throughout the novel Beatrice had been one of the only characters that had done nothing wrong, she was a dignified woman of god yet she was murdered so inhumanly. The description of the scene is so horrific because the detail of the event that’s taking place is shocking to all who reads it, but the actual words Theresa uses and the context she uses them with are done perfectly. She asks a rhetorical question to make the reader think about the circumstances we find her in.
We’re told about a young man calling for her to be shown mercy, this made me think for a split second “Hang on, there may be some hope left for her! ” then the next sentence were told, “she was shown no mercy. ” The reader gets told of the smells, the sounds of the victims burning flesh. It gives off a morbid first impression yet I found myself still wanting to read on. That’s what made it such a powerful text! When I read it in the epilogue I didn’t realize I was Just reading the prologue again as I saw it in such a different light. Yours truly, Kate Wilson Prisoner Of The Inquisition