, Research Paper
Religion and Politicss in a Revolutionary Era
The United States is a diverse topographic point with 1000000s of people that have many distinguishable political orientations and moralss. Recent events have brought to the head of national attending what people view as morally acceptable behaviour for public functionaries. These events have besides raised the inquiry: What is the relationship between the personal character of our political leaders and their ability to regulate sagely? It is my sentiment that the bulk of Americans become concerned about the moral behaviour of their leaders merely when the state, province, or vicinity is traveling through a hard clip economically. Throughout history, and peculiarly in the instance of President Clinton, if the economic system is making good and the state is in a general province of security, most citizens are willing to look the other manner on the morality of their leaders. I want my leaders to hold a strong moral character, with a solid foundation of faith, but I besides think that when it comes to transporting out the responsibilities of an elective office, personal character and faith do non impact a individual s ability to regulate sagely.
Throughout the rich history of the United States, many leaders have been benchmarks for morality and nationalism. Unfortunately, there have besides been public functionaries who have abused their office and taken advantage of the trust and religion bestowed upon them by the populace. The interesting impression is that some of the most well-thought-of leaders in American history did non honour the same set of values that the populace did. Thomas Jefferson, revered as one of the greatest presidents of all clip, owned slaves and had a kid by one of them. His face is on Mt. Rushmore although he engaged in activities that were non consistent with the values of the mean American. President Jefferson was able to spread out the size of the United States by procuring the Louisiana Purchase from France and easing universe tensenesss in northern Africa and Europe, even though he behaved in a mode that was non conventionally respectable. Another illustration of an functionary who behaved culpably in his private life but still governed efficaciously is President Franklin Roosevelt, the unequivocal symbol of the 20th century. The American people elected him to the presidential term four times although he was unfaithful to his married woman. Despite the fact that President Franklin Roosevelt was an fornicator, he was still able to make Social Security, resuscitate the economic system from the Depression, and lead the state through World War II. The Monica Lewinsky dirt has focused the attending of the media and the state on President Bill Clinton s character and his efficaciousness as president. His character, or the deficiency of it, has non affected the economic system. Throughout the full dirt, the domestic economic system of the United States has continued to execute at record degrees, and unemployment and rising prices are at degrees last seen in the sixtiess. The character of President Clinton has non affected his ability to regulate, but it has taken off from clip he could hold been working on the jobs of the United States. There might non be a relationship between character and the ability to regulate, but acting in a vulgar mode and exhibiting immorality affects the credibleness of the state, province, or vicinity. The character of Bill Clinton has non affected his occupation public presentation, but it has affected how other states view the United States and has besides diminished the R
espect many Americans have for the presidential term.
American history is about the many leaders of our state and how they dealt with hardships and with their ain personal devils. The aforesaid presidents were able to go on to regulate although their character could be viewed as corrupt. The Presidents and member of Congress discussed in the undermentioned paragraphs were non, in my sentiment, able to regulate efficaciously because their deficiency of character interfered. President Richard M. Nixon would hold been regarded as one of the greatest foreign policy presidents in history if he had non been entangled in the morass that was the Watergate dirt. President Nixon opened diplomatic dealingss with Red China and was eventually able to procure an terminal to the Vietnam struggle, but his achievements will everlastingly be overshadowed by his engagement in the Watergate housebreaking and subsequent screen up. If President Nixon had displayed more character, he would hold made the determination non to authorise the housebreaking or order his subsidiaries to perpetrate illegal Acts of the Apostless. The cover-up and resulting media attending wholly consumed President Nixon much as Vietnam had President Johnson. Ultimately, Nixon was forced to vacate the presidential term in 1974 because of the Watergate dirt. President Ulysses S. Grant is possibly the best illustration of how greed and deficiency of personal character can impact occupation public presentation. Grant implemented a spoils system much like that of President Andrew Jackson. He appointed old war companions to his cabinet and friends to high-ranking staff places. These people, non the president, ran our state for eight old ages. President Grant had struggles of involvement in military affairs and in the oil concern every bit good ; moreover, his political subsidiaries were doing determinations the president should hold been doing, and accordingly the Grant disposal was ill-famed for greed and corruptness. Because personal addition and corruptness consumed President Grant and his disposal, nil was accomplished for the state, and that is why Ulysses S. Grant is considered one of the no-name presidents. Many congresswomans have been forced to vacate because of their illegal and unethical Acts of the Apostless while stand foring the people of their territories. Representative Bob Livingston of Louisiana, who was due to go the Speaker of the House of Representatives, resigned after it was made populace that he had an adulterous matter. Representative Dan Rostenkowski of Illinois, the former president of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, resigned and later exhausted clip in gaol for his engagement in misapplying the House of Representatives Post Office and besides for struggles of involvement affecting revenue enhancement statute law.
It is hard to happen a politician who was excessively honorable for his or her political good, but one such rare individual is former President Jimmy Carter. He is considered one of the most moral and ethical Presidents of the United States but was unable to regulate sagely because he had excessively many moral rules. Cynical as it may look, the President of the United States needs to be able to demo ethical flexibleness on occasion to acquire the occupation done. A rare president can equilibrate the line between being excessively moral and non moral plenty. President Carter s moral values prohibited him from being able to negociate and do trades in foreign policy and domestic policy ; his character did non assist him to regulate sagely, but it has made him one of the most well-thought-of individuals in the universe today.