Scarlet Letter Essay, Research Paper
Patriotism and Fear
Patrick Henry and Jonathan Edwards are both dramatic talkers and have the ability to act upon a crowd. Henry uses his ability of persuasion to rock the Virginia House of Burgesses. Edwards uses persuasion to give a discourse directed toward evildoers and natural work forces. Henry and Edwards have many analogues and fluctuations in their plants. One can separate the similarities and differences between Patrick Henry and Jonathan Edwards in the intent, repeat, and rhetoric of their Hagiographas.
Jonathan Edwards and Patrick Henry have similar, yet different intents. Both Henry and Edwards are seeking to convert or actuate a group of people to move upon what is righteous and merely. Henry, indifferent to Edwards, is pleading with the Virginia House of Burgesses to contend against the ruthless and overmastering British for independency:
It is in vain, sir, to palliate the affair. Gentlemen may shout peace, peace & # 8212 ; but there is peace. The war is really begun! The following gale that sweeps from the North will convey to our ears the clang of echoing weaponries! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here tick over? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they hold? Is life so beloved, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the monetary value of ironss and bondage? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know non what class others may take ; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me decease! ( Henry 90 )
Henry & # 8217 ; s purpose is to act upon Congress to take the manner to war and he is seeking to actuate the Congressmans to experience the same manner as he does about contending for freedom. The audience, after listening to Henry & # 8217 ; s address, is compelled to experience an duty to contend for their state until independency is gained or until their blood has been spilled. Although Edwards is motivation talker like Henry, his intent is to inform evildoers that & # 8220 ; the Devil is waiting for them & # 8221 ; and that & # 8220 ; it is merely the power and mere pleasance of God that holds [ them ] up & # 8221 ; ( Edwards 38-40 ) . Edwards & # 8217 ; intent is to guarantee people that everyone is condemned to an infinity in snake pit and merely by squealing their wickednesss and admiting Christ as the lone Jesus with grant them redemption. The audience is terrified from Edwards & # 8217 ; statements and through their fright of damnation people are obliged to alter their iniquitous ways. Although Henry and Edwards have somewhat similar intents in carrying a group of people, they deviate into their ain separate intents every bit good.
Both Patrick Henry and Jonathan Edwards carry through their intents by utilizing repeat to farther set across their ideals. Henry, in his alone manner, uses repeat to warrant the agencies for war:
We have petitioned ; we have remonstrated ; we have supplicated ; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interjection to collar the oppressive custodies of the ministry and Parliament. Our requests
have been slighted ; our expostulations have produced extra force and abuse ; our invocations have been disregarded ; and we have been spurned, with disdain, from the pes of the throne. ( Henry 90 )
Henry & # 8217 ; s principle is that the settlers have done everything possible to forestall war, all of which have failed, and now it is clip to contend. The audience feels easy swayed by Henry & # 8217 ; s political orientation, experiencing a sense of award and nationalism mounting inside them. Edwards, deviating from Henry & # 8217 ; s positions, uses repeat to warn evildoers of & # 8220 ; an angry God & # 8221 ; and & # 8220 ; God & # 8217 ; s wrath & # 8221 ; ( Edwards 38 ) . Edwards & # 8217 ; aim in making this is to make an feeling of fright so that evildoers will reform themselves to be pure. The reaction of the audience is one of fear and desperation as the people fear for their psyches and redemption. Although both Henry and Edwards usage repeat to further pass on their point, Henry uses it to actuate people, whereas Edwards uses it to frighten evildoers.
In add-on to repeat, Henry and Edwards both use rhetorical inquiries to farther convey their doctrines. Henry uses rhetoric to set across his rules about the Revolutionary War:
They tell us, sir, that we are weak ; unable to get by with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the following hebdomad, or the following twelvemonth? Will it be when we are wholly disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by indecision and inactivity? Shall we get the agencies of effective opposition, by lying supinely on our dorsums, and embracing the false apparition of hope, until our enemies shall hold bound us manus and pes? ( Henry 90 )
Henry uses rhetoric to oppugn the award, unity, and nationalism of people in the settlements. This convinces the audience to believe that they should be contending for freedom and independency. Jonathan Edwards uses rhetorical inquiries to coerce evildoers to believe, & # 8220 ; Who knows the power of God & # 8217 ; s power? & # 8221 ; ( Edwards 38 ) . Edwards & # 8217 ; usage of rhetoric creates worry and panic in the heads of evildoers and unhallowed people. The fright and horror created by Edwards & # 8217 ; sermon convinces the audience into making anything for redemption from the fiery cavities of snake pit. Although the rhetoric that Edwards and Henry usage are different, they both satisfy the writers & # 8217 ; intents.
Patrick Henry and Jonathan Edwards are both enthusiastic talkers and are first-class in carrying groups of people. Edwards and Henry both use rhetoric and repeat ; nevertheless, Henry uses them to travel people whereas Edwards uses them to make the facet of fright in peoples & # 8217 ; heads. Henry and Edwards have similar yet different intents in that both are seeking to rock a group of people but each talker has a different audience and technique of persuasion. Patrick Henry and Jonathan Edwards are similar in the impression that both are facile talkers nevertheless each talker has his ain alone attack to persuasion.