About 5. 26 million people with a felony strong belief are non allowed to vote in elections. Each province has its ain Torahs on disenfranchisement. Nine provinces in America for good restrict criminals from voting while Vermont and Maine allow criminals to vote while in prison. Advocates of felon re-enfranchisement believe criminals who have paid their debt to society by finishing their sentences should hold all of their rights and privileges restored. They argue that attempts to barricade ex-felons from voting are unjust. undemocratic. and politically or racially motivated.

Oppositions of criminal vote say the limitations are consistent with other voting restrictions such as age. residence. mental capacity. and other criminal limitations such as no guns for violent wrongdoers. They say that convicted criminals have demonstrated hapless judgement and should non be trusted with a ballot. I believe convicted criminals should be allowed to vote upon release from prison because they exercise good judgement ; in add-on. keep backing their right to vote would be a misdemeanor of the US Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the 8th amendment.

One ground ex-felons are non allowed to vote is because of their sensed judgement. Harmonizing to Roger Clegg. President and General Counsel of the Center for Equal Opportunity. we don’t let kids. foreigners. or the mentally unqualified ballot because we do non swear them or their judgement. Furthermore. he believes that felons belong in this class because people who commit serious offenses have shown that they are non trusty. On the other manus. Steve Chapman. Columnist and Editorial Writer at the Chicago Tribune. believes we allow ex-convicts get married. reproduce. purchase beer. ain belongings. and thrust.

They don’t lose their freedom of faith. or their right against self-incrimination. but in many topographic points. the premise is that they can non be trusted to assist take our leaders. The intent of a prison is to protect society and rehabilitate the wrongdoer. Rehabilitation refers to activities designed to alter felons into jurisprudence staying citizens. and include supplying educational classs in prison. learning occupation accomplishments. and offering guidance. If we thought that captives could non be rehabilitated. so they should non be released.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

If criminals are released. we make a judgement that they are fit to populate in society ; hence. they are capable of doing trusty determinations. Furthermore. non leting criminals to vote is a misdemeanor of the US Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a landmark piece of statute law in the United States that outlawed prejudiced vote patterns that had been responsible for the widespread disenfranchisement of African Americans in the United States. Section Two of the Voting Act contains a general prohibition on voting favoritism.

Furthermore. Congress amended this subdivision to forbid any vote pattern or process that has a prejudiced consequence or prohibits a group of people from voting. New York is one province that restricts felony vote. In the New York Election Law 5-106. it clearly disqualifies a group of people. incarcerated criminals and criminals on word. from voting in elections. This is a blazing misdemeanor of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Further. forbiding criminals from vote is a misdemeanor of the 8th amendment of the United States Constitution.

The 8th amendment prohibits inordinate punishments and demands that the penalty fits the offense. As a consequence. provinces that exclude criminals from voting for good. including Alabama. Tennessee. Kentucky. and Florida. are in misdemeanor of this amendment. On one manus. oppositions of criminal vote use the Fourteenth amendment to warrant disfranchising convicted criminals. They believe in restricting the freedoms of convicted criminals. Incarceration is designed to penalize inmates and impress upon them the magnitude of their offenses.

On the other manus. utilizing the Fourteenth Amendment to warrant the disenfranchisement of criminals by provinces is equivocal. The amendment claims. “no province shall do or implement any jurisprudence which shall foreshorten the privileges of citizens of the United States. ” For illustration. if John Doe was convicted of a felony. served clip. and was released. all of his privileges as a citizen of the United States should be returned to him. Furthermore. disfranchising criminals is counter to the American tradition for the enlargement of voting rights for all citizens.

All in all. convicted criminals are still American citizens and should be allowed to vote upon release from prison. Attempts to forestall ex-felons from voting are unjust and undemocratic. After functioning their prison sentence. they have paid their debt to society and have been rehabilitated. As a consequence. all of their natural rights as citizens should be returned to them. Not leting criminals to vote would be a misdemeanor of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Eighth Amendment to the US Constitution.

x

Hi!
I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out