Socrates Essay, Research Paper

While reading Plato? s Meno, Euthyphro, apology, and Crito, it became evident

that Socrates held really strong beliefs about the relationship between jurisprudence and

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

morality. Socrates makes it clear about the grounds Torahs should be or non be

followed. He besides clarifies his base on why Torahs should be followed and why

noncompliance to the jurisprudence is seldom justified. Socrates positions humanity in the

context that anybody is capable of wrongdoing. He continues with the amplification

that even returning an hurt upon oneself is incorrect. Socrates so makes a

connexion between the metropolis and morality. If one is moving without the metropolis? s

allowance, one is making incorrect toward the metropolis and it? s Torahs. Behaving wrongly

towards the people is besides making incorrect against the metropolis. The error would

go a manner of destructing the metropoliss Torahs, and aching citizens in the procedure.

Socrates compares this relationship to that of how a kid should non do injury

to his parents. By making so you disrespect the Torahs within the metropolis. Causing

injury to your male parent would take to strong belief ; further exemplifying the fact that

incorrect against the jurisprudence is a incorrect against everybody who abides by that jurisprudence.

Socrates follows this by analyzing what each citizen is taught. From birth you

are told to obey Torahs. You were brought to life from your female parent and male parent and

therefore you should esteem and obey the regulations that they do. But the metropoliss Torahs

were there before you mother and male parent, and are therefor every bit if non more

of import than the Torahs of your female parent and male parent. The metropolis? s jurisprudence should be

respected at least every bit every bit as one? s parents should. Socrates so goes on

to explicate that you do non hold the same rights as your parents. Because they

hold taught what is right and incorrect, it is immoral to handle your parents as they

dainty you. Your parents must hold a higher place than you because they taught

you. This idea is so extended to the metropolis with the quotation mark? One must obey

the bids of one? s metropolis and state, or carry it as to the nature of

justness. It is impious to convey force to bear against your female parent or male parent,

it is much more so to utilize it against you country. ? ( Crito, 46 ) One should obey

your parents, but more of import is the metropolis. Because the metropolis was that which

has taught your ascendants and your parents, it must be superior to them. The

metropoliss Torahs being su

perior to your female parent or male parent, should be respected and

followed. Socrates explains his ideas of the metropolis and its regulations as the nature

of life. We were welcomed into the universe by the metropolis so it is immoral to contend

against it. The Torahs should be accepted and followed. But one should non obey a

jurisprudence merely because it is a jurisprudence. What is moral has been taught to us by our

parents, and to them from the metropolis. It is their sentiment that will state us if our

actions are moral or non. However, one facet of the metropolis and its Torahs is that

you are non forced to make as it dictates. As Socrates explains, you have two

options, to obey the jurisprudence or non. But in respects to Socrates sentiment, it is non

another? s sentiment to make up one’s mind what is right and incorrect for us. But merely as

kids argue with their parents, one doesn? Ts have to make everything that he

is told to. It is an immoral life to follow others sentiments about morality. From

Euthyphro Socrates sentiment on how noncompliance can be justified is shown. When

Euthyhro accuses his male parent of slaying, he states? I say that the pious to make

what I am making now, to prosecute the offender, be it about slaying or temple

robbery or anything else, whether the offender is your male parent or your female parent or

anyone else ; non to prosecute is impious. ? ( Euthyphro, 22 ) In this instance,

Socrates is supporting himself. He doesn? t believe in all the God? s thoughts and

is warranting his sentiment. He has similar ideas about morality when he states

? I find it difficult to accept things like that being said about the Gods, and it

is likely to be the ground why I shall be told I do wrong. ? ( Euthyphro, 22 )

After being told by the Oracle the he was the wisest, he set out to turn out the

prophet incorrect. He talked to everybody merely to happen that those who were supposed

to be the wisest knew the least. This scrutiny leads to the belief that

parents merely teach their kids without any cognition about what they are

instruction. The metropolis finds Socrates guilty of the charges of? perverting the

immature and non believing in the Gods whom the metropolis believes. ? This lends to the

idea that the lone ground one should believe in Gods is because the metropolis

does. But Socrates is on a continual hunt for cognition. It is evident that

he does non believe the same manner that the metropolis does. From his point of position,

both the noncompliance of the jurisprudence and the civil noncompliance behind it was



I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out