ICEF, GROUP 2/2

Coach: Yulia Poltorak Tutor: Yulia Poltorak

Student: Matyukhin Anton

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

research Paper on Sociology

Substance maltreatment:

Alcohol Consumption and intoxicant dependance among the young person.

& # 1052 ; & # 1077 ; & # 1078 ; & # 1076 ; & # 1091 ; & # 1085 ; & # 1072 ; & # 1088 ; & # 1086 ; & # 1076 ; & # 1085 ; & # 1099 ; & # 1081 ; & # 1080 ; & # 1085 ; & # 1089 ; & # 1090 ; & # 1080 ; & # 1090 ; & # 1091 ; & # 1090 ; & # 1101 ; & # 1082 ; & # 1086 ; & # 1085 ; & # 1086 ; & # 1084 ; & # 1080 ; & # 1082 ; & # 1080 ; & # 1080 ; & # 1092 ; & # 1080 ; & # 1085 ; & # 1072 ; & # 1085 ; & # 1089 ; & # 1086 ; & # 1074 ; , 2 & # 1082 ; & # 1091 ; & # 1088 ; & # 1089 ; , & # 1042 ; & # 1099 ; & # 1089 ; & # 1096 ; & # 1072 ; & # 1103 ; & # 1096 ; & # 1082 ; & # 1086 ; & # 1083 ; & # 1072 ; & # 1101 ; & # 1082 ; & # 1086 ; & # 1085 ; & # 1086 ; & # 1084 ; & # 1080 ; & # 1082 ; & # 1080 ; .

1999

Contentss:

& # 183 ;Reasons for taking this subject
.

& # 183 ;The construct of intoxicant.

– What is intoxicant?

– Factors that influence intoxicant & # 8217 ; s consequence.

– Immediate effects of intoxicant.

& # 183 ;The construct of intoxicant dependance ( alcohol addiction ) .

– What is alcohol addiction?

– What are the symptoms?

– Three distinguishable phases of alcohol addiction.

– Long- term effects of intoxicant.

– Treating alcohol addiction.

& # 183 ;Sociological research.

– Reasons for taking the questionnaire as a method of my study and a sample design.

– The list of inquiries.

– The analysis of a information received.

& # 183 ;Literature used.

Reasons for taking this subject.

Though all people know the truth about the unprecedented craft of intoxicant drinks, many of them fall in its skillfully set up traps. This is because of the character of intoxicant, which can coerce to wish itself, despite its harmful, ill and debauched nature.

One sage said: & # 8220 ; Wine brings four qualities to everyone, who drinks it. In the beginning, a individual starts looking like a peacock- he puffs, his gestures are sail and dignified. Then, he additions a nature of a monkey and begins joking and playing with everyone. Afterwards, he likens himself with a king of beasts and becomes assumptive, proud, certain of his power. But at the terminal he changes into a hog and wallows in soil & # 8221 ; .

The worst thing is that rummies and alkies, being bearers of negative positions and stereotypes of antisocial behavior, non merely invariably interrupt the regulations and norms of behavior in different Scopess of critical activity of people, but besides actively promote the engagement in the inebriation people around them, particularly immature.

It is stated by many surveies that each rummy and alcoholic renders corrupting influence on the norm of 4-5 individuals from the nearest atmosphere.

For many centuries people tried to happen the most effectual installations and ways of protecting the humanity from the catastrophic influence of intoxicant. They tried to develop steps on extinguishing the multiple bad effects of inebriation and alcohol addiction, chiefly the steps on rescuing, conveying back to a normal life a invariably increasing figure of victims of intoxicant.

The history of anti-alcoholic battle has left many illustrations of utilizing in these intents different steps up to such extremist, as a decision of rummies in prisons, their physical penalty, executings, full prohibition of production and merchandising of intoxicant drinks, e.t.c. However, a ingestion of intoxicant continued to turn steadily, covering new groups and beds of populations.

On the one manus one can propose a uninterrupted growth of the universe intoxicant ingestion to be due to a weak efficiency of steps used by the world against the unsafe societal phenomena, on the other & # 8211 ; due to a important support of grounds and conditions, doing the wide multitudes of population to fall in the intoxicant dependance.

Until a recent clip, the deficient theoretical development of inquiries, associated with spreading of an alcoholic ingestion, nonreversible account of grounds of inebriation and alcohol addiction rendered a negative influence upon the contents and way of anti-alcoholic battle, on its scheme and tactics. Practice of an anti-alcoholic battle shows that work outing of concrete inquiries on warning and a displacing the negative phenomenas is impossible without a deep survey of the grounds, doing ingestion of intoxicant drinks and advancing distributing a inebriation and alcohol addiction.

That is why I chose this subject to be discussed in my work. I truly see it to be a societal job about every bit indispensable as the drug dependance. Unfortunately, I have a deficiency of clip and experience to cover all the facets of it and to do a deep sociological probe, but however I & # 8217 ; ll seek to make my best.

The construct of intoxicant.

What is intoxicant?

The active ingredient in all alcoholic drinks is ethyl ethyl alcohol ( intoxicant ) , which is produced by barm cells moving on saccharides in fruits and grains. Ethyl intoxicant works much like ether, moving as an anesthetic to set the encephalon to kip. Alcohol is a cardinal nervous system sedative that slows down organic structure maps such as bosom rate and respiration. Small measures of intoxicant may bring on feelings of good being and relaxation ; but in larger sums, intoxicant can do poisoning, sedation, unconsciousness and even decease. There are three types of alcoholic drinks:

*Beer
is fermented from grains and contains three to six per centum intoxicant. *Wine
is fermented from fruit and usually contains 12 to 14 per centum intoxicant. Fortified vinos have extra intoxicant added and incorporate 18 to 20 per centum intoxicant. Wine ice chests are a mixture of fruit juice, sugar, and red or white vino, and incorporate four to seven per centum intoxicant ( about the same alcoholic content as beer ) *Liquor
is made from distilled ( boiled off ) intoxicant and contains 40 to 50 per centum intoxicant. This is expressed as grades of cogent evidence ( two cogent evidence peers one per centum intoxicant ) . For illustration, 80 cogent evidence spirits is 40 per centum intoxicant.

Factors that influence intoxicant & # 8217 ; s consequence.

Drinking has different effects on different people, and the same sum of intoxicant can impact the same individual otherwise on different occasions. Four factors act upon how alcohol affects people:

Sum of Alcohol
. The more intoxicant, the stronger the effects. A individual may imbibe beer, vino, or whisky ; what matters is the sum of intoxicant that is consumed.

Body Weight
. Peoples who weigh more are less affected by the same sum of intoxicant than people who weigh less. Alcohol is H2O soluble heavier people have more blood and H2O in their organic structures, so the same sum of intoxicant will be more diluted. Gender besides affects the influence of intoxicant. Womans have a higher proportion of fat and a lower proportion of H2O in their organic structures than work forces ; hence, a adult female will hold a higher blood intoxicant content than a adult male who is of the same weight and who drinks the same sum.

Food.
Alcohol “ goes to the caput ” more easy if one has merely eaten or if one chow while imbibing. Food slows down the transition of intoxicant from the tummy to the little bowel.

Attitudes.
What a individual expects to go on after imbibing has a batch to make with what does go on. A drinker who expects to acquire rummy is more likely to experience or move rummy.

In one survey, an experient group of drinkers was given a glass of something non-alcoholic but was told it contained alcohol. Most of the group still got rummies.

Immediate effects of intoxicant.

When consumed, intoxicant goes right to the tummy and passes through to the little bowel, where it is absorbed into the blood stream. It takes about 30 seconds for the first sums of intoxicant to make the encephalon after consumption. Once at that place, intoxicant Acts of the Apostless chiefly on nervus cells deep in the encephalon. One drink for the mean individual ( a 12-ounce beer, five ounces of vino, or one and one-half ounces of 80-proof whisky ) will make a feeling of relaxation. Two and a half drinks in an hr can impact the drinker ‘s opinion and lower suppressions. Five drinks in two hours will raise the blood intoxicant content ( BAC )
to. 1 0, the point of legal poisoning in most states. After this sum of intoxicant, the mean drinker will see bleary vision, slurred address, hapless musculus coordination, and a deficiency of rational opinion. Ten drinks will give a BAC of 0.20. It will take 1 0 hours for the intoxicant to be wholly metabolised. After more than 12 drinks, the BAC will lift to 0.30 and the drinker will be in a daze. A BAC of O.40 to 0.50 will bring on coma. A drinker in this status may be near decease because he could purge and choke while unconscious. Breathing is likely to halt with a BAC of 0.60. The BAC can be measured by utilizing a breath, urine or blood trial. This sum is measured as a per centum — how many parts of Alcohol to how many parts of blood. Extinguishing intoxicant from the organic structure is a long procedure. About 90 per centum must be metabolised through the liver. The staying 10 per centum is eliminated through the lungs and piss. It takes about one hr to extinguish one-half ounce of intoxicant. Heavy imbibing in a short period of clip will frequently do a katzenjammer the following twenty-four hours. A katzenjammer is a mark of intoxicant toxic condition ; it is the organic structure ‘s reaction to alcohol backdown. Symptoms of a katzenjammer include sickness, freak out, concern, crossness and shudders.

The construct of intoxicant dependance ( alcohol addiction ) .

What is alcohol addiction?

The construct of chronic inebriation as a disease appears to be rooted in antiquity. The Roman philosopher Seneca classified it as a signifier of insanity. The term alcohol addiction, nevertheless, appears foremost in the classical essay “ Alcoholismus Chronicus ” ( 1849 ) by the Swedish physician Magnus Huss. The phrase chronic alcohol addiction quickly became a medical term for the status of accustomed drunkenness conceived as a disease ; and the carrier of the disease was called an alky or alcoholist ( e.g. ,
Italian alcoolisto,
Gallic alcoolique,
German Alkoholiker,
Spanish alcoh & # 243 ; lico,
Swedish alkoholist
) .

Alcohol dependance, or alcohol addiction, is psychological and/or physical trust on intoxicant. It is one of the most common medical unwellnesss seen by doctors. If you are dependent on intoxicant, you feel or show a demand for it when it is stopped. If you crave alcohol, or experience distressed without it, you are said to be psychologically dependent. If you have bodily alterations when intoxicant is stopped, such as hot and cold flashes and/or shudders, you are said to be physically dependent. Alcohol dependance, or alcohol addiction, is psychological and/or physical trust on intoxicant. It is one of the most common medical unwellnesss seen by doctors. If you are dependent on intoxicant, you feel or show a demand for it when it is stopped. If you crave alcohol, or experience distressed without it, you are said to be psychologically dependent. If you have bodily alterations when intoxicant is stopped, such as hot and cold flashes and/or shudders, you are said to be physically dependent.

Alcoholism is a primary, chronic disease with familial, psychosocial and environmental factors act uponing its development and manifestations. The disease is frequently progressive and fatal. It is characterised by uninterrupted or periodic impaired control over imbibing, preoccupation with the drug intoxicant, usage of intoxicant despite inauspicious effects, and deformations in thought, most notably denial. Presently there are three different theories to explicate alcohol addiction:* Genetic Theory
defines alcohol addiction as the consequence of a predisposed reaction to alcohol due to chromosomes, cistrons or hormonal lacks.* Psychological Theory
defines alcohol addiction as a status that exists in which people have a predetermined temperament or personality that sets off a reaction to alcohol.

* Sociological Theory
defines alcohol addiction as a erudite response and believes that dependence is a consequence of the influences of society.

Whatever definition or theory is used, it is known that alcohol addiction is a progressive unwellness that can be treated. Each alky has a different imbibing form, but the one thing all alkies have in common is an unmanageable imbibing wont.

What are the symptoms?

Alcohol dependance takes many signifiers, including intermittent imbibing, uninterrupted imbibing, and orgy imbibing. Many alkies become able to imbibe of all time larger measures of intoxicant before feeling or looking rummy. Alcohol users normally medicate themselves with intoxicant, utilizing it, frequently day-to-day, to assist them loosen up, as a assurance supporter, or in order to avoid backdown symptoms.

Behavioural symptoms of people who are dependent on intoxicant may include:

Trying to conceal grounds of imbibing

Promising to give up imbibing

Drinking stronger alcoholic drinks or get downing to imbibe earlier in the twenty-four hours

Having long periods of poisoning

Drinking entirely

Problems at work

Missing work

Blackening out

Loss of involvement in nutrient

Temper alterations ( choler, crossness, violent effusions )

Personality alterations ( green-eyed monster, paranoia )

Repeatedly driving under the influence

Injuring self or others while drunk

Carelessness about visual aspect

Slower idea procedures, deficiency of concentration, confusion, problem retrieving things

Fiscal jobs caused by imbibing.

Physical symptoms may include:

Nausea or shaking in the forenoon

Poor eating wonts

Abdominal hurting

Chronic spasms or diarrhea

Numbness or prickling esthesiss

Failing in the legs and custodies

Red eyes, face, and/or thenars

Unsteady walking or falls

New and declining medical jobs.

Three distinguishable phases of alcohol addiction.

* Early Phase.
A individual in the early phase of alcohol addiction uses alcohol as a get bying device to alleviate tenseness or flight from jobs. The alcoholic must imbibe more and more to accomplish the same consequence and has problem halting after one drink. The alcoholic makes promises to discontinue imbibing but ne’er follows through.* Middle Stage.
An alky in the in-between phase of alcohol addiction can non acquire through the twenty-four hours without intoxicant and may necessitate a drink in the forenoon to get the better of the “ shingles. ” The middle-stage alky will get down to

manipulate others, lie about imbibing, and may imbibe in secret or hide intoxicant. It is harder and harder to acquire the same effects as tolerance additions. Irregular bosom round, high blood pressure, loss of appetency, crossness and insomnia are physical and psychological jobs at this phase. The alcoholic denies that imbibing is a job.* Late Phase.
The alky now lives to imbibe and avoids and distrusts others. All aspiration is lost and the drinker is unable to get by with duty and is frequently absent from work. A late-stage alky may endure from rearward tolerance: the encephalon and liver can no longer digest a high degree of intoxicant, so the drinker becomes impaired after even little sums of intoxicant. Malnutrition, nervus disfunction, loss of memory, mental confusion, impaired vision, high blood pressure, bosom disease and cirrhosis of the liver can happen during this phase. If imbibing Michigans, There are terrible backdown reactions. Late-stage psychological jobs include shame, guilt, terrible depression, violent behavior, low self-esteem, loss of control of emotions, loss of concentration and learning ability. At this point, the alcoholic “ hits underside. ” The alky may go on to imbibe despite hurting or disablement. The lone feasible option is to seek intervention. The alcoholic now lives to imbibe and avoids and distrusts others. All aspiration is lost and the drinker is unable to get by with duty and is frequently absent from work. A late-stage alky may endure from rearward tolerance: the encephalon and liver can no longer digest a high degree of intoxicant, so the drinker becomes impaired after even little sums of intoxicant. Malnutrition, nervus disfunction, loss of memory, mental confusion, impaired vision, high blood pressure, bosom disease and cirrhosis of the liver can happen during this phase. If imbibing Michigans, There are terrible backdown reactions. Late-stage psychological jobs include shame, guilt, terrible depression, violent behavior, low self-esteem, loss of control of emotions, loss of concentration and learning ability. At this point, the alcoholic “ hits underside. ” The alky may go on to imbibe despite hurting or disablement. The lone feasible option is to seek intervention.

Long- term effects of intoxicant.

Frequent and drawn-out usage of intoxicant has many damaging effects on the organic structure. Heavy drinkers develop a tolerance for intoxicant, which means that larger sums of intoxicant are needed to acquire the coveted consequence. A drinker is physically dependent if backdown symptoms are experienced when intoxicant usage is discontinued suddenly. Symptoms vary but include delirium shudders ( the “ DTs ” ) , spasms, purging, elevated blood force per unit area, perspiration, dilated students, sleep jobs, crossness and paroxysms. Most of these symptoms will lessen in two to three yearss, though crossness and insomnia may last two to three hebdomads. Psychological dependance occurs when the drinker becomes so bemused with intoxicant that it is hard to make without it. Short-run memory loss and blackouts are common among heavy drinkers. A blackout, which is an amnesia-like period frequently confused with go throughing out or losing consciousness, consequences when the drinker appears normal and may work usually ; nevertheless, the individual has no memory of what has taken topographic point. Research indicates that blackouts are associated with advanced phases of alcohol addiction, and there is a correlativity between the extent and continuance of intoxicant ingestion during any given imbibing episode and the happening of blackouts.

Treating alcohol addiction.

The Oklahoman alcohol addiction is detected, the better the opportunities of recovery. There are several effectual intervention methods for alcohol addiction, and what works for one individual may non work for another. Many options should be explored when seeking aid. Local or province wellness administrations can be contacted to happen out what intervention options exist in each community.

Sociological research.

Reasons for taking the questionnaire as a method of my study and a sample design.

I chose a questionnaire as a method of a information aggregation chiefly because of the deficiency of ability ( largely clip ) to seek to carry on an interview. Secondary, I consider the interview to be the inappropriate type of a study in the instance of such a delicate job as alcohol addiction. An interview, no affair formal or informal, might supply a big prejudice I the informations, therefore in the analysis, because many people may see it to be unwanted for them to allow others cognize the bare truth about their lives. Furthermore, an interview can non be anon. ( at least the interviewer would be initiated in your jobs ) . I besides did non pull off to avoid an open participant observation & # 8230 ;

As this sociological research is of a little graduated table ( a sample of 36 individuals ) and was held among the pupils from one university ( HSE ) , it did non include such complicated ( and unneeded in this instance ) methods of informations aggregation as a telephone study or mail study, the refusals job was eliminated. Though, merely because of the same fortunes, it has a prejudice of stand foring merely the smallest portion of the Russian young person: Moscow pupils andmy research would be more descriptive than analyzing.

The multistage sample was conducted in the undermentioned manner: 4 out 5 fortes were observed ( I did non hold the entree to law ) and the representatives were chosen by a random sampling ( utilizing the tabular array of random figures and pupil lists ) harmonizing to a proportion of figure of pupils on each forte. Therefore I have got 14 representatives of the economic forte, 10- of direction, 8- of sociological and 4- of the ICEF.

Sing the fact that I dealt with pupils, I was non afraid of personal inquiries. Students, as immature and unfastened category of population, are far from being embarrassed when they are asked such.

The list of inquiries.

1. Your sex:

M___ F____

3. Your forte?

A ) Economics B ) Management C ) Sociology D ) ICEF

2. Your attitude to the intoxicant?

& # 1040 ; ) Negative

B ) Simply do non wish, when there is person rummy beside me.

C ) Neutral

D ) Positive

3. Make you imbibe intoxicants?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes C ) Did non of all time seek.

B ) No

4. If non, why? ______________________________________________

5. If yes, in what age did you seek it the first clip ( about ) ?

A ) 5-10 old ages D ) 15-17 old ages

B ) 10-13 old ages E ) 17 and over

C ) 13-15 old ages

6. How frequently do you imbibe intoxicants?

& # 1040 ; ) Almost every twenty-four hours B ) Less than three times a hebdomad

C ) Less than two times a month

7. Make your parents drink ( in general ) ?

& # 1040 ; ) No C ) Yes, merely female parent

B ) Yes, merely father D ) Both

8. With whom do you normally drink ( the most frequently instance ) ?

& # 1040 ; ) With friends from the university B ) With other friend/buddies

C ) With parents

9. Can you imbibe entirely?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes, happened to be B ) No

10. Make you imbibe to get the better of a katzenjammer?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes B ) Yes, but non in the forenoon

C ) Never

11. Make you necessitate some ground for imbibing intoxicant like Birthday or another vacation?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes, ever B ) Not needfully.

12. How can you sort your alcoholic ingestion?

& # 1040 ; ) I have no dependence

B ) I have some warnings about my dependence

C ) Merely psychological dependence

D ) Physical dependence.

13. Make you care about the sum of intoxicant you drink per twenty-four hours? ( Several replies are possible )

& # 1040 ; ) Yes

B ) No

C ) No, if there is no my girlfriend/boyfriend beside me.

D ) No, if my parents wouldn & # 8217 ; t see/know.

Tocopherol ) No, if it is a large vacation ( I can let myself )

14. What intoxicant drink do you imbibe in the most frequently instance?

& # 1040 ; ) Beer

B ) Cocktails ( Gin-Tonic, etc. )

C ) Wine, Aperitifs ( Martini, Karelia, etc. ) or plain

D ) Strong alcoholic drinks ( Vodka, Cognac, Scotch and etc. )

15. Have you of all time tried to give up imbibing?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes B ) No

16. Have you of all time tried to cut down the sum of intoxicant consumed?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes, it worked B ) Yes, it did non work

C ) No

17. Would you imbibe less, if parents set up more rigorous demands to your behavior?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes B ) No

18. Would you imbibe less, if they ceased to give you pocket money?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes

B ) No, I would take a loan, but will drink/somebody would handle. C ) No, I earn money myself.

19. Comparing with the old twelvemonth, do you imbibe:

& # 1040 ; ) Less/less frequent C ) As much/with the same frequence

B ) More/more frequently

20. Did alcohol impact your survey consequences, from your point of position?

& # 1040 ; ) No B ) Yes, they become better C ) Yes, they become worse.

21. How did you go through the old exams/entry tests?

A ) Excellent B ) Well

C ) Satisfactory D ) Failed

22. Why do you imbibe alcohol? ( Several replies are possible )

& # 1040 ; ) To take emphasis

B ) To raise the temper

C ) To back up to company

D ) To observe some vacation

Tocopherol ) Your discrepancy of answer_________________________________

23. Make you care, what others think, when they see you drunken? ( Except people, who know you )

& # 1040 ; ) No, if they are non policemen B ) Yes

24. Have you of all time had extrinsic behavioral manifestations ( aggressiveness/depression ) connected with the ingestion of intoxicant?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes B ) No

25. Did you have blackouts ( of a non- traumatic nature ) ?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes, once/sometimes B ) No

26. Make you smoke?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes

B ) No B ) No

27. Make you take drugs, even the weakest 1s?

& # 1040 ; ) Yes, have tried one time C ) Yes

B ) Yes, but very- really seldom D ) No

The analysis of a information received.

I have got 21 male and 15 female respondents. Among these people there are merely 1 work forces and 1 adult females who do non imbibe intoxicant at all.

The attitude towards the intoxicant is distributed as followers: 39 % – positive ( among them: 13- work forces and merely 1 adult female ) ; 39 % – impersonal ( among them: 6 work forces and 8 adult females ) ; 22 % – merely do non wish, when there is person rummy beside them ( among them: 2 work forces and 6 adult females ) and none of the respondents said that their attitude is negative.

29 % of male and 27 % of female respondents have parents who do non imbibe at all. 4 % of male and 13 % of female pupils have merely father who drinks ( in general ) and 4 % and 6 % respectively- merely female parent. The per centum of both parents imbibing ( in general ) is 62 for work forces and 53 for adult females. This manner the difference between the current and the following coevals ( the young person ) can be shown. As we see from this information, the per centum of non-drinking parents is far from 1/21 and 1/15 ( 5 % and 7 % ) of their progenies. Most of the work forces drink with their friends from the university ( 55 % ) and the largest portion of female responses to this inquiry autumn on the reply B ) -with other friends/buddies ( 50 % ) .

The following few inquiries I consider to be instead interesting, because they chiefly cover with the alcoholic dependence and its phases. The inquiry about imbibing entirely as one of a symptom of alcohol addiction brought up the consequences of 50 % of male pupils who could make this, and merely 29 % of female who have besides chosen this reply. Drinking to get the better of a katzenjammer is normal for 55 % of work forces and 14 % of adult females. Making the same thing at any clip except forenoons is suited for 15 % and 7 % of pupils severally. And merely 30 % of work forces and 79 % of adult females consider this to be & # 8220 ; non their manner & # 8221 ; . Unfortunately, every bit much as 85 % of work forces and 64 % of adult females do non necessitate a normal ground for imbibing like observing some party, etc. Two out of 20 male respondents and two out of 14 female have uncertainties about their dependence and 2 work forces consider themselves to be psychologically dependent already.

From the graph above we can see the following interesting fact: none of the adult females do non care about the presence of the their fellows while they are imbibing and male respondents do non take their parents into consideration make up one’s minding haw many drinks to hold.

Here we can see the inclination of male pupils normally imbibing beer or strong alcoholic drinks, and females normally imbibing cocktails of aperitifs.

The inquiry concerned of all time seeking to give up imbibing and ne’er following though was aimed to uncover one of the symptoms of the first phase of intoxicant dependence. The consequences were: 30 % of work forces and 14 % of adult females tried to make so. 25 % of work forces and no females tried to cut down the sum of intoxicant consumed and succeeded and 5 % and 7 % severally tested but did non win in cut downing it.

Merely 30 % of males and 7 % of the females would cut down the sum consumed if their parents were stricter about their behavior. But if they cease to give them pocket money 40 % of male respondents and 43 % of female respondents would make it.

Merely 20 % of work forces and 14 % of adult females consider their survey success to be dependent from the consequences shown on the graph above.

50 % of males and 36 % of females wrote, that they drink to raise their temper ; 20 % and 10 % – to back up the company ; 15 % and 20 % – to take the emphasis ; 15 % and 34 % – to observe some vacation severally.

About 80 % of males and 21 % of females said that there wear & # 8217 ; t care what others ( non those, whom they are aquatinted with and if they were nit police officers ) would believe if they saw them drunken. The replies to the inquiry & # 8220 ; Have you of all time had extrinsic behavioral manifestations ( aggressiveness/depression ) connected with the ingestion of intoxicant? & # 8221 ; are 35 % of male respondents and 14 % of female said & # 8220 ; yes & # 8221 ; and 65 % and 86 % – & # 8220 ; no & # 8221 ; . 40 % of males and 14 % of females have already got aquatinted with blackouts.

From my point of position, these consequences are much like the existent 1s, as I am besides a pupil and I am making the open observation of all this every twenty-four hours. The state of affairs seems to be ruinous, and something should be done about it.

Literature used.

1.
Britannica encyclopaedia & # 8217 ; 99.

2.
Socis magazine
& # 8470 ;
5,3,8 1997 ;
& # 8470 ;
10 1998

3.
hypertext transfer protocol: //search1.healthgate.com/hid/alcoholism/

x

Hi!
I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out