Susan Sontag’s claim it is clear that picture taking bounds people’s reading of the universe. This claim I false because images rang from people in complete destitution as seen by exposures of Jacob Riis to people holding a good clip on holiday. Because of this diverse aggregation of images. people see the universe as it is alternatively of “more than it truly is” . This is seen through actions of Hitler assorted universe events such the Vietnam War and the Kent State incident every bit good as literature like The Jungle by Upton Sinclair. These eclectic beginnings show that picture taking does non restrict our position upon the universe and how things truly are because the image is a clear position of what truly happened.
Der fuhrer shows that picture taking shows a clear position of the universe. Unlike what Sontag stated in lines 21-23 Hitler proves her incorrect. Political and ethical cognition is shown by exposures taken of Hitler’s concentration cantonments. These images show the anguish of 1000000s. They besides show that picture taking does non restrict our apprehension of the universe. By analyzing these exposures basic cognition and history is apparent. These exposures show how the universe was and what precisely happened hence beliing with Sontag’s statements in line 23. This shows that Hitler’s actions was a clear position of how picture taking does non restrict out apprehension of the universe. instead helps us spread out cognition.
Incidents at Kent State University and the Vietnam War are both illustrations of what the universe was at a certain point. If one is to look at a exposure of the incident at Kent State they would recognize that is really what happened there at that point. The image does non go forth out any item because it is like a ocular that will remain for a long period of clip and can non be easy manipulated to acquire one to believe something. This is besides seen in images from Vietnam. The universe was the manner it was in the image and did non restrict anything. This conveys that exposures do non restrict our position of the universe like Sontag claims.
In the book The Jungle by Upton Sinclair it is clear by facile descriptions in the book that people lived in bad conditions and worked in these topographic points every bit good. As described in the book while meat was being processed there were ditty atoms and mice in there which leaves a ocular image in the head of the reader. This once more helps widen on cognition of the hapless conditions and criterions of people were under. This besides helps better our apprehension of the universe. By analyzing exposures by Jacob Riis it is clear that images were taken of people’s places. By demoing insanitary conations. one is non deprived of apprehension of the universe but instead with a clear one which shows/ expands our political and ethical cognition. This shows that The Jungle shows why exposures helps spread out and have a greater incite on the universe.
Photographs are precisely what one sees. That’s how the universe was and the exposure does non pull strings thoughts. By analyzing the actions of Hitler every bit good as The Jungle it is clear that photos don’t bound out apprehension of the universe as Sontag claims. The incident at Kent State exposures of Vietnam during the war besides show the universe as it is to its fullest possible hence demoing Sontag’s claim is inaccurate and ocular images of the people help us acquire a greater penetration on the universe.