The Book Of Mark Essay, Research Paper

The Book of MarkAn Essay for Humanities CoursesThat Treat The Bible As A Historical DocumentPART A MARK & # 8217 ; S THEOLOGY REFLECTED IN WRITING Mark and the other revivalists used fundamentally five ways to alter, edit or enhanceJesus & # 8217 ; expressions to reflect their ain positions of Christianity. Harmonizing to the Five GospelsBook, plagiarism and changing of authorship was non a offense, but really really common Mark & # 8217 ; stime. Besides, Mark ne’er knew Jesus first-hand, he someway had to do a & # 8217 ; narrative & # 8217 ; frombasically Hearsay! Mark groups different fables and expressions of Jesus by subject ; doing a falseimpression that these things happened in order. This may hold small consequence on altering themeaning of the lesson, nevertheless it illustrates the fact that Mark was seeking to author a & # 8221 ; clear & # 8221 ; narrative for people, instead than a book of facts. The best illustration would be inMark 10:17-31 ( Jesus Counsel to the Rich ) & A ; ( Parable of The Camel and the Eye of aNeedle ) . It is dubious that these things happened at the same clip ; nevertheless, they areGREY in The Five Gospels anyhow & # 8230 ; and likely didn & # 8217 ; t go on as Mark describes. Thisbrings us to Mark & # 8217 ; s composing manner. Mark seems to & # 8220 ; tack-on & # 8221 ; sentences to Jesus & # 8217 ; instructions to do them more & # 8221 ; Christian. & # 8221 ; This truly changes the significance more than any other tactic! Who knows whatMark may hold edited-out to carry through what he wanted to affect upon his readers? Inthis, he tries to construe the significance of Jesus & # 8217 ; actions & # 8230 ; and does this in a deceptive manner! For illustration: Mark 2:19, Jesus sing Fasting. Jesus makes a strong statement againstimportance to fasting, but Mark ( in 2:20 ) ticket on: & # 8220 ; But the yearss will come when the bridegroom will be taken off from them, and they will fast in those days. & # 8221 ; This blatantly shows that Mark held higher respect for the Old Traditions of Fastingrather than Jesus & # 8217 ; new instructions! This is besides an illustration of & # 8220 ; Christianizing Jesus & # 8221 ; accordingto traditions that have already earned regard from Jews in their tradition. ( Wow, this isstarting to sound like a battle between Today & # 8217 ; s Political Parties, International Relations and Security Network & # 8217 ; t it? ! [ Jesus = LiberalPolitics / Judaism = Conservative Politics ] ) . Finally, Mark likes to & # 8220 ; soften the blow & # 8221 ; of Jesus & # 8217 ; Hard expressions. He does this forprobably the same ground Paul preached that Circumcision was non required for Christians. A good illustration is The Inexcusable Sin ( Mark 3:28- ) . Jesus clearly states that wordsagainst the Holy Spirit are inexcusable. However, Mark adds that & # 8220 ; all things are possiblewith God, & # 8221 ; which softens this rough regulation! MARK & A ; THE PAROUSIA Mark lived during the Jewish War of 66-70 ADE. Unlike the ulterior revivalists, Matthew and Luke, Mark believed the Parousia was upon us, approximately to go on at any clip! And, for obvious ground: he lived in an highly troubled clip for the Jews, and he hadnot been worried yet by the Parousia & # 8217 ; s hold as were ulterior revivalists. Mark 13:4 & # 8211 ; & # 8216 ; Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the mark when allthese things will be fulfilled? & # 8217 ; Harmonizing to Mark & # 8217 ; s authorship, Jesus foremost predicts thedestruction of the Temple. However, Mark had written after the devastation of the Templein 70 ADE! This tactic agrees with The Five Evangels: composing revelatory expressions of Jesusafter they have already been & # 8220 ; fulfilled. & # 8221 ; I would say he did this to give recognition to hiswriting of the 2nd approach of God. An illustration is the fable of The Fig Tree in Mark 13:28-37. This add-on, evidently written by Mark and non said by Jesus, shows the urgency in which Mark expectedthe Second Coming: & # 8220 ; Assuredly, I say to you, this coevals will by no agencies pass off till all thesethings take place. & # 8221 ; You can easy see why the other revivalists, Matthew, Luke & A ; John, re-wroteMark & # 8217 ; s revelatory authorship to be more of a & # 8220 ; Sacred Time, & # 8221 ; and less definite. Mark used a common maneuver of citing Bible ( particularly Dan, Isa, Mic & A ; somePsalms ) for his revelatory authorship. We besides saw this in Paul & # 8217 ; s letters old ages earlier. Peopleregarded Bible as fact, hence a perfect tool to give recognition to Mark & # 8217 ; s & A ; Paul & # 8217 ; s newwriting! Our ain civilization today is wrapped-up in tradition and Bible quotation marks as undispu

tabular array

fact, even though people twist these things to advance their ain involvements! My ain familyjustifies their hatred for homosexuals by citing the Bible ; they justify a & # 8220 ; Woman & # 8217 ; s Place & # 8221 ; by usingthe Bible ; they justify their racism through the Bible ( stating that & # 8220 ; Love your Brother & # 8221 ; couldonly perchance mention to people of your ain colour, because your brother could non perchance beof another colour ) ; they justify violent penalty for felons by utilizing the Bible ; theychoose their political party harmonizing to their actions being every bit conservative as the Bible. There isn & # 8217 ; t a twenty-four hours that goes by that I don & # 8217 ; t wish that my ain community was non stillliving in the dark-ages. Part B THE PARABLE: THE UNFORGIVING SLAVE This parable reflects a portion of our American Lifestyle that is really Un-Jesus! Ourculture, our authorities and our judiciary system thrives on penalty ; at least we don & # 8217 ; tstill have debitors & # 8217 ; prison! Contrary to Mark & # 8217 ; s reading of this parable, I belive it represents a type ofperfect love for one & # 8217 ; s neighbour that is reflected in Jesus & # 8217 ; Kingdom of God. Rather thanforcing a regulation upon the reader, as Mark does, Jesus meant it to be a narrative where the listenermay take an appropriate manner of behaviour ; for forgiveness can non be compromisedwithout unwanted effects. Alternatively, Mark adds a Menace to the terminal of the fable ( which is evidently NOT thewords of Jesus ) ! & # 8220 ; That & # 8217 ; s what your heavenly Father will make to you, unless you find it in your heartto forgive & # 8230 ; & # 8221 ; I find in many illustrations that Jesus wanted to hold his followings think forthemselves, and do picks harmonizing to their ain witting ; He merely made expressions andparables to assistance followings in happening the truth for themselves ( much like Socrate & # 8217 ; s tactic forthe determination of Truth or Justice ) . Mark, for his ain grounds, felt that it was his responsibility to attach every expression of Jesuswith a bid or menace & # 8230 ; hence doing God seem revengeful! Decision: Comparison TO MY FIRST PAPER I remember that when I wrote my first paper, I made a point to discourse quotation marks fromJesus that seemed foreign to my traditional feeling for Jesus. I wanted to see something inJesus that I ne’er knew before! Well, I was surprised to happen that these same quotes turned-up to be largely Pink in the Five Gospels ( some Grey, but no black ) ! My first quotation mark of Jesus was from Matthew 12:49-50 ; Jesus refers to the battalions ashis female parent and brothers. This turned-up pink in the Five Gospels. I thought that thisquote represented Jesus as a God on a equal degree with his followings, making a sense ofcommunity ( I think that if Jesus were about today ( and wasn & # 8217 ; T in an refuge ) , he would be aCommunist ) . To me, this contradicts today & # 8217 ; s church of authorization, holding Bishops, Deacons, etc. Next, I quoted a few of Jesus & # 8217 ; words to populate by in chapters 6 and 7 of Matthew. Most of these quotation marks turned up pink, nevertheless a few were assorted with Grey, demoing theadditions of Matthew & # 8217 ; s editing. I noted in my paper that I felt these regulations were simple & A ; logical ways to take a happy and loving life style, instead than difficult regulations that we are used to. The following two quotation marks I used ( Matthew 12:13 & # 8211 ; Jesus Breaking the Sabbath ) ( Mark15:1-15 & # 8211 ; Jesus & # 8217 ; covering with P. Pilate ) were gray and black in the Five Gospels. Theinteresting point to this is that these are the two quotation marks in which I criticized Jesus & # 8217 ; actions. Imade points that I thought Jesus was a dissembler in prophesying to maintain Judaic Law, and atthe same clip, interrupt the Sabbath! I besides earnestly questioned Matthew & # 8217 ; s reading thatP. Pilate tried to salvage Jesus, cognizing that Pilate was non a friend to the Jews! It is refreshingto me to happen these quotation marks in Grey & A ; black, because they were really confounding to me informing an sentiment about Jesus. I have enjoyed this assignment because I truly feel like I am acquiring to understandthe Historical New Testament! I tested my cognition of Jesus by reading his quotation marks frommy New King James Version Bible, and tried to descry add-ons that were non Jesus & # 8217 ; , and byguessing the colour of some of his quotation marks. In look intoing back with The Five Gospels, I foundmyself to be reasonably darn accurate! Amazing! & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8211 ;

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

x

Hi!
I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out