The Cuban missile crisis is of a remarkable sort: the universe has ne’er witness any other like it. Though it happened at a clip when the fires of the Second World War were merely deceasing out and the cold war was deriving impulse. the lessons derived from it are still relevant today. This is because our modern-day universe is still at the menace of a atomic onslaught and particularly from those provinces that view the United States as their head enemy.

Some of the inquiries that this historical crisis brings into our head are what were its causes. its subsequent effects and its impact to our present international dealingss. These are the important issues about the crisis that this paper seeks to turn to.

Immediately after the Second World War. the universe came under the rule of two ace powers with the U. S in the western hemisphere. there was the United States of America and in the E. the Soviet Union. The glowering hostility between these two super powers was best brought out by their differences in ideological chases. The United States advocated for capitalist economy and democracy as the manner frontward for a comfortable universe. where as the Soviet Union advocated for socialism.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
Writers Experience
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
Writers Experience
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
Writers Experience
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

As it wont to be. the two ace powers wrestled to derive a bigger portion of the control of the universe than its rival. This influence could merely be measured by the extent their several political orientations could distribute. The provinces that embraced the political orientations of a peculiar ace power were counted as Alliess.

Each ace power. therefore. saw the pressing demand to garner to their side as many Alliess as possible. By so about all states of the West were allied to the United States. where as many states in the E engendered socialism. Therefore there was stiff competition for the still open provinces in the development states in Africa. Pacific and the Caribbean.

The support from these developing states was achieved through military and economic support. In that vena. Cuba which imbibed socialism shortly after Fidel Castro ascended into power through a putsch. subsequently on herself at dunces with the United States.

The Cuban Missile Crisis: Detailss of the Fallout

Even up to day of the month Cuba is still a Socialistic island in the Western Hemisphere. This controversial ideological base. which has been vehemently promoted and even protected by the Fidel Castro. didn’t merely get down during the missile crisis. As a affair of fact. the Cuban crisis. which happened in the early 1960ss. was merely but the flood tide of the labored dealingss between Cuba and the United States.

In any instance. the Cuban crisis was non an event but a procedure that entailed the simmering hostility between the two conflicting political orientations. The beginning of this historical atomic crisis was in late 1958. This was when the former president of Cuba. General Fulgencio Batista was ousted by Fidel Castro. That incident gave manner to extremist alterations in Cuba. both political and economical. For one. Fidel Castro. who had orchestrated the revolution became the Commander in Chief of the Cuban armed forces. That was followed by his going the Premier in February 1959. hence the caput of the Cuban authorities. ( Encyclopedia Britannica. ( 1981 ) 933 ) .

The morning of the Cuban economic and political revolution was barely bright. If anything. the Castro authorities had legion hindrances to overcome. For one. the 26Thursdayof July Movement. the vehicle that Castro had used to sit into power had obscure political programs. unseasoned regulating accomplishments and comparatively undistinguished support from the Cubans themselves. But it was non long before the urban workers. the hapless provincials. the young person and all the Cubans who had idealistic longings poured their support behind the new authorities. To add onto that support from the grassroots. the Communist Party of Cuba ( Partido Communista de Cuba ) . which had been in operation of all time since 1925. came in ready to hand. It assisted the new authorities in about all the affairs related to political organisation ( Encyclopedia Britannica. ( 1981 ) 357 )

Under the leading of Fidel Castro. who had subsequently declared himself a Marxist- Lenin. the Cuban authorities modeled itself on the ideological rules of the Soviet axis states. and became the first socialist province in the Americas. This was the generation of the labored relation between Cuba and the United States. ( Encyclopedia Britannica. ( 1981 ) 357 ) .

The resoluteness to get rid of capitalist economy in Cuba in 1959 was demonstrated by the taking over of the belongings owned by the United States authorities and enterpriser. This farther vitiated the relation between the two provinces. By early sixtiess. all the economic ties between Cuba and the United States were broken. And in an effort to wrest power from the socialist authorities in Cuba. the U. S authorities set out to fiting the 1000s of Cuban expatriates in a command to subvert the Cuban authorities. This attempt culminated to their landing at the Bay of Pigs in 1961. which turned out to be a fiasco to the encroachers. ( Encyclopedia Britannica. ( 1981 ) 994 ) .

All these were simply puting the phase for what was subsequently to go the greatest missile crisis and the lone one so far. in the world’s history. Joseph R. Collins refers to this missile crisis which happened in October 1962 as the Big Crunch. Joseph recounts in his book. The American Past: A Survey of American History. that it was John F Kennedy. the so President of the United States. who was the first authorization to acquire air current of how the Soviet Union was be aftering to convey the U. S to its articulatio genuss. ( 728 )

He had got this information from the United States military intelligence. A U-2 flight over Cuba had revealed that the Soviets were constructing up installings for atomic missiles with the mark being the United States. But before conveying his find to the American public’s notice. Kennedy sought the wisdom of a commission. which he constituted to analyse the crisis. ( 728 )

There were legion proposals that were forwarded to Kennedy as to how he would manage the state of affairs. One was from Dean Acheson proposing that bombers be dispatched to pulverize the missile sites. Another proposal urged Kennedy to occupy Cuba. ( 728 )

Either by default or design. President Kennedy rejected both proposals and alternatively bought his brother’s more moderate and flexible attack. This worked to the advantage of the United States and the universe at big: The C. I. A study had overlooked some important facts on the land. They had reported that there was simply a smattering of Soviets in Cuba. The fact of the affair was that there were so 40. 000 Soviet companies in add-on to the 270. 000 Cuban ground forces. which the C. I. A had grossly underestimated. ( 782 )

President Kennedy announced to the American populace the find of missiles and what it meant to the security of the American people. At the same clip. he ordered the naval encirclement of Cuba. the destruction of the atomic missile sites and the subsequent remotion of any atomic arms from Cuba. It was subsequently learnt in 1989. that President Kennedy’s base made Fidel Castro to panic to an extent that he sought safety in a sand trap beneath the Soviet Embassy and demanded that Russians strike the United States. ( 782 )

It is evident that Castro’s heedlessness impelled Khrushchev. the so Russian President to be even more cautious. For four yearss. he was loath to stir. The work on the missile site went on. Apart from that. the Soviet ships that were ferrying missiles continued on their manner to Cuba. They were traveling to add the 20 missiles to the other 20 that were already at that place in the site. However. Kennedy’s naval encirclement Cuba’s impeded Cuba edge cargos in making the island. ( 782 )

In October 26. the tenseness that had build up at the menace of a atomic onslaught began to decrease easy. Khrushchev sent a compromising missive to White House. He agreed in the missive to take the missiles but merely on status that that the United States pledged in bend non to occupy Cuba. As the United States was chew overing over that. Khrushchev wrote another missive to corroborate that the Soviets would retreat the missiles if and merely if the United States removed its missiles from Turkey. which bordered the Soviet Union. The two demands by the Soviet Union were interpreted by White House that there was some instability within Kremlin. an being of indecision. That offered a opportunity for triumph of the United States. The Whitehouse disregarded Kremlins 2nd proposal and pledged to follow with the first 1. That brought the whole crisis into an terminal. ( 782 )

Joseph alludes to the fact that even before the Cuban Missile Crisis began ; President Kennedy had been be aftering to level the Turkish Missile sites. The crisis nevertheless. did non merely offer a turning point for Kennedy’s presidential term ; it besides improved the relation between the United States and the Soviet. ( 782 )

As a affair of fact. a ‘hot line’ was even installed in both the White House and the Kremlin to ease instant communicating between Russian and American leaders in instance there originate another crisis in the hereafter. Subsequently on. the Soviet Union joined the United States and the United Kingdom in subscribing a pact that banned atomic testing in the ambiance. Deserving noting is that. even China and France. the lone other atomic powers declined to be signers to the pact. ( 782-783 )

The Significance of The Cuban Crisis to the Contemporary World.

At the nucleus of the Cuban crisis was the menace to use the atomic power by a world power against another world power. This could hold led to the worst war in the history of world. The onslaught could hold obliterated a immense portion of the United States state. And with the devastating of Hiroshima and Nagasaki still in our memories there is no gauging what the Russian onslaught could hold wrought to the United States.

Even today. it can non be gainsaid that our universe is at the menace of a atomic onslaught. Not with the states like North Korea and Iran blatantly overlooking the commissariats of the Non- Proliferation of atomic pact and endangering to unleash panic on their enemy provinces. In ways more than one. this means that the world’s safety is in existent hazard. And if steps are non taken so the human civilisation can be effaced within seconds.

With such menaces. it is instead obvious that the stairss we have made in traveling the universe into fresh domains of civilisation are barely suffice to give us the permission to kip on our awards. In fact. these additions could be lost in a eccentric jeer of our attempts as the human race through innovations and inventions.

Harmonizing to Genocide and Omnicide: Technology at the Limits. an essay written by Berel Lang in the book. Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity: The Cardinal Questions by Avner Cohen and Steven Lee. it is observed that we live in a universe where it is evident that race murder and homicide have no particular causative or conceptual relation to each other. besides the atrocious chances that can both convey about big scale decease. They claim that omnicide has in recent times shaped a construct and pressed on people’s consciousness the ghost of atomic war which in kernel threatens the being of world. Genocide on the other manus. frequently described as the obliteration of persons belonging to a peculiargenoor group. though narrowly defined. is an happening that world has survived at least one time and gained priceless lessons from it. ( 114 )

The modern-day universe. Barel adds. is presently faced with go oning chances of both omnicide and race murder and even with a clear cognition of their outrageousness non regarded as an unfortunate happenstance the already complex historical period has been farther complicated. This bears no significance on the cultural constructions or the ethical norms of this clip or the hereafter. ( 114 )

Barel points out that if the history of past responses to extreme state of affairss is a usher. like the Cuban missile crisis in this instance ; the happening of omnicide and race murder might be of small difference even on ideological or theoretical contemplation. For case. it would be improbable that they would impact on the belief of theodicy shared by traditional faiths with modern scientific discipline. harmonizing to which history is rational and progressive. in the long tally working for the good. ( 114 )

In The Present Menace: Nuclear Weaponries and Nuclear War. another essay in the same book mentioned above. omnicide is regarded as a existent possibility in the universe today. a universe where there are reserves of lay waste toing stuff ( atomic arms ) enough to set to an terminal all civilised life. The worst portion of it all is that these reserves are invariably increasing. ( 41 )

Therefore. our civilisation has non merely the possible to destruct itself but besides to endanger its ain safety. These frights have been designated as the principle for a planetary policy of security. the policy of atomic disincentive. which is believed to be the requirement to universe peace and order. ( 41 )

Besides mentioned in the essay is the fact that atomic arms redefine the human status itself. Yet we all have been less attentive to the experiential and moral significance of the atomic menace dominating civilisation. Our failure to admit the existent menace of omnicide has possibly amounted to our new human quandary. Consequently we have taken atomic explosives as issues that bear merely political and military significance. burying to see them as pressing affairs of human concern. ( 41 )

Taking all that into consideration it instead obvious that the Cuban missile crisis could non hold happened in vain: it decidedly offers priceless lessons that can today come in ready to hand in our efforts to prevent any at hand atomic onslaught.

Harmonizing to a paper by James Blight. Joseph Nye and David Welch contained in. Cuban Communism a book written by Irving Horowitz and Jamie Suchlicki. the Cuban Crisis has attained fabulous importance.

In kernel it offered a eccentric opportunity in which the atomic world powers confronted one another. in what appeared to be the precursor of a atomic holocaust. And since the Cuban missile crisis remains the lone atomic crisis the universe has of all time experienced. it therefore serves as the great research lab in which the survey of the art of crisis direction. and particularly with in international dimension can be undertaken. ( 94 )

This paper besides shades extra visible radiation on the understanding on the lessons that the Cuban crisis holds for us today ; a dissension that was brought into crisp focal point in a certain meeting of bookmans and former members of the Executive Committee of National Security Council ( ExComm ) the group that was convened by President Kennedy to rede him on the affair of the Soviet missiles in Cuba.

In amount. the paper points out that the lessons would most likely stress the demand for flexibleness in managing such crisis and that managerial preciseness and cautiousness in the face of danger. Or instead. there are no lessons at all since the atomic danger of 1962 was about certainly a map of imaginativeness ; a testament of the failure to understand the polar importance of a favourable military balance for the United States. ( 94 )

However. the paper warns. it would be imprudent disregard the event as irrelevant to the modern-day universe since certain important factor have non changed since 1962 or factors that have increased in importance because of the alterations in the strategic balance ; For case the psychological science of crisis determination devising. the importance of little group political relations and the hazard of accidental escalation.

The paper goes in front to mention an incident when former policy shapers from the Kennedy Administration and bookmans of the missile crisis met in Hawk’s Cay. in March 1987. They reviewed the seven lessons outlined by Robert Kennedy in his memoir of the crisis titled. Thirteen Days. The lessons were ; in clip of crisis. ample clip should be taken and action should ne’er be taken on the first urge.

Apart from that. the President should be exposed to a assortment of sentiments but he/she should depend to a great extent on those with in-depth cognition of the Soviet Union ( in other words. the adversaries ) ; the president should besides retain civilian control taking into history the limited mentality of the armed forces.

The President should excessively pay attending to universe sentiment and take cautiousness non to mortify the opposition but alternatively offer a manner out. Finally the President has to mind of oversight. These lessons are a contemplation of classical diplomatic negotiations. However. the history of the missile crisis ne’er offered an chance to turn out right the advocates of forceful action to occupy Cuba that that would hold led to a more desirable result. ( 95 )

This historical missile crisis which happened in Cuba over four decennaries ago must hold been instigated by the Soviet Union quest to protect herself from United States. This decision stems from one of the conditions that Russia made for her to retreat the missiles from Cuba. The missile sites in Turkey had to be demolished foremost.

In any instance. the United States was supporting herself from an ideological enemy and the Soviet besides picked the cue and did the same. The worse could hold happened if the two ace powers had failed to decide the crisis amicably.

The black consequence of such a confrontation could hold been irrational. Thus the stairss taken by the two ace powers are commendable. That is why it is hence. deserving claiming that the Cuban missile crisis bears some significance in our today’s international dealingss. And if we must larn from history. so there is a batch to larn from the crisis.


( 1981 )Encyclopedia Britannica. Castro Fidel. 993.

( 1981 )Encyclopedia Britannica. Cuba 357.

Joseph. ( 1984 )The American Past: A Survey of American History. 782. 783.

Avner and Lee.Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity: The

CardinalQuestions.41. 114.

Irving and Jamie.Cuban Communism. 94. 95.


I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out