The purpose of this paper is to analyze the impact of organisational cultural alterations in Gladiator and ensuing motivational alterations on their ain portion clip employees. Gladiator is one the oldest, largest insurance group in the universe with operations over 27 states. The organisation have 3400 directors across India with 30,000 portion clip employees ( FPA-Financial Planning Advisors ) spreaded in 224 subdivisions and near to 3000 locations. The current issue I am discoursing is in Indian Industry of Gladiator, in my ain subdivision ‘s analogue concern squad. The organisation was executing extremely and was traveling to spread out 3 months after I joined in the late 2007.The hiring of a new Middle director for the enlargement, whose inability in accommodating to the present tested and proved company civilization led to a creative activity of a new, incorrect sub civilization within the same subdivision and subsequent de-motivation of the bulk of executing FPA ‘s. The paper highlights the nexus between the sub civilization and motive and public presentation of the FPA ‘s.

The new sub civilization was a consequence of a new Middle director introduced for the enlargement of Gladiator in the country. He had different beliefs and patterns which were put into pattern through his squad. These patterns were different from the dominant organisational civilization in pattern. Gregory ( 1983 ) supports this by proposing that bomber civilizations develop as consequence of a new leader and his patterns. The new Manager inducted a new direction squad and whose different premises and patterns caused cultural alterations which is supported by Rubenson & A ; Gupta ( 1992 ) who asserts that, civilization alterations with a new direction squad which was further supported by Helms, M & A ; Stern, R ( 2001 ) . Pascale ( 1984 ) defined organisational civilization as “ The manner we do things around here ” . These new ways and patterns had a definite Impact on the motive of bulk bing FPA ‘s who was mapped to this new squad and who was familiar with the dominant organizational civilization.Most of the FPA ‘s could n’t accept this new civilization of direction and this resulted in a subsequent de-motivation and debasement of public presentation of the FPA ‘s.

So which all factors of the new sub civilization led to FPA de-motivation? To understand this Lashkar-e-Taiba ‘s take a individual unit director squad of 10 FPA ‘s into our position. The squad consists of persons coming from a assortment of background ( pensionaries, Housewifes, non occupant Indians, concern work forces, self employed etc. ) and who gives importance to assorted demands like, physiological, societal, self -esteem, acknowledgment etc in different precedence. So in what manner the new sub civilization failed in pull stringsing the work environment? In order to acquire the best out of FPA s from different backgrounds, directors needed to pull strings the work environment to fulfill the assorted FPA demands. The new unit directors did non understand the FPA demands nor were they pull stringsing their work environment to acquire the best of the FPAs. They where merely concerned about their ain marks and was supercharging the FPA for accomplishment of their marks. This was supported by Mcclelland ( 1961 ) where he suggests to pull strings the work environment for different employee demands for accomplishing high public presentation. My personal experience and my position is that directors should pull strings their environment for acquiring the FPAs in their side. This would hold helped in a better resonance creative activity between directors and the FPAs thereby assisting the directors to achieve their marks and at the same clip the FPAs would be happy and motivated for the undertaking.

The peculiar occupation the FPA ‘s is involved in is high in accomplishment and all other wagess and wage are related to whether they achieve or near adequate concern. Because of this it was really of import for the directors to maintain FPA motivated by ever making a sodium thiosulphate on their accomplishments. This peculiar occupation varied over state of affairs and clip and was supported by acquired demands theory of Mcclelland ( 1961 ) . The new in-between director developed a sub civilization of non carry oning unit meeting and subdivision meetings where normal civilization was prone to such meetings twice in a month. This was a immense phase where the FPA ‘s are recognised for their public presentation In forepart of over 300 FPA ‘s in subdivision degree. The sodium thiosulphate created in these meetings led to the farther motive of achieved FPA ‘s and new FPA ‘s were motivated to accomplish newer highs like the achieved. The sudden alteration to this sub civilization led to occupation dissatisfaction due to miss of acknowledgment for their accomplishments and work. Herzberg ‘s motive hygiene theory support this fact. ( Schneider & A ; locke, 1972 ) farther supported this stating hygiene and motive factors influence employee satisfaction. From my personal experience I do hold to both of them because wage and other wagess are given to all, but they do anticipate acknowledgment for the work done through adversity. This can be universally applied on all FPA ‘s.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
Writers Experience
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
Writers Experience
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
Writers Experience
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

One other factor was the deficiency of designation of demands of single FPA ‘s by the unit directors in the new sub civilization. As each FPA ‘s are coming from a different backgrounds, their involvements and demands varied for wage, acknowledgment, accomplishment. Some really rich retired personals and concern work forces who worked as FPA were merely interested in acknowledgment in the national degree and stand foring the administration in international phases. They gave small importance to pay and other wagess. Maslow says that persons satisfy needs merely in a hierarchal order. But ( Mcclelland, 1961 ; Lawler & A ; Suttle,1972, Rauschenberger et Al, 1980 ) are against the Maslow ‘s Hierarchy.I does hold to them as the demands and motivations in this instance varied over persons. Some were merely interested in acknowledgment and ego regard and gave less penchants to pay and other fringe benefits. Maslow besides says that needs one time satisfied can non move as incentives in future. I am wholly against this position as from my experience I have seen that people value to acquire motivated many times for acknowledgment of the same work in different state of affairss and in different clip. Unit of measurement directors in the new squad were unable to understand the demands of FPA. This was a consequence of the failure of the in-between director in socializing the freshly recruited unit directors. He dint socialize the new directors with senior members of the squad to make attitude, mission and for apprehension of the concern. Wanous ( 1980 ) suggest the importance of socializing new members by senior members for accommodating them to the organizational civilization. I do agree to this suggestion as I was myself inducted and trained by the senior members of the subdivision, accommodating me to the dominant performing civilization of the organisation. Adapting to the new sub civilization by new unit directors resulted in a failure to place the cardinal factors required for successfully actuating and repeatedly acquiring the best public presentation out of the FPA ‘s. This extremely affected their public presentation and motive.

Was there any influence of the new sub civilization on the enlisting procedure of new FPA ‘s? Recruitment of FPAs is a procedure which requires the unit directors to prospect for quality people. They should so be able to make an understanding with the freshly prospected FPA ‘s for making concern. Then the FPA ‘s are trained for fiscal merchandises and in general about the finance industry following which they have an test. Merely after the successfully uncluttering the test they are allowed to make fiscal concern as per the regulative organic structure IRDA. The major issue in this drawn-out procedure is that the FPA will non be having any payment during this initial period of around 75 yearss. Majority of the FPA ‘s will be acute to acquiring an immediate wage after fall ining. But in the absence of wage the opportunities of the FPA being de motivated was high and the rate of abrasion was high even In the dominant organisational civilization, where there was proper methods to get the better of this issue. The new directors tried to enroll FPA ‘s but were incognizant of what to make to keep and maintain the recruited FPA motivated because of the sub civilization they were in. This Led to high de-motivation of FPA and as a consequence bulk ( 7/10 ) of recruited FPA tend to drop preparation and test without which they ca n’t make concern. The company was passing 6000 Rupees on each individual irrespective of their Exam visual aspect. This resulted in the lowering of company profitableness in footings of new concern and outgo. Additionally it minimised the entry of new FPA ‘s in to the administration and thereby cut downing competitory advantage and high force per unit area for new unit troughs. The sub civilization rejected the administration ways and unwritten procedures involved in enlisting. Couke & A ; Rousseau ( 1988 ) advocates that counter civilizations formed reject dominant organizational beliefs, procedure, ways and develop their ain ways of extension through a new leader or director. This position perfectly fits into this scenario.I personally suggest that the enlisting procedure should get down by the resonance creative activity between the FPA and unit director. This will assist in retaining the employee in the long tally and maintaining and maintaining the FPA motivated in the initial non-remuneration period.

All the above positions generate the interesting inquiry: Is there any relation between motive and wage for some FPA ‘s? My low reply is yes. Each of the FPA has to set in immense attempt in surmising, prospecting and shuting a fiscal client with an intangible merchandise to sell. So from my experience the bulk of the FPA ‘s do anticipate a just sum of wage for the work they put in. There were instances in which the payout was delayed or non provided due to cancellation. ( Cameron and Pierce, 1977 ) suggests the importance of wage and wagess for employee motive. The FPA used to confront a immense sum of de-motivation during this period and the director ‘s function was to maintain the liquors up. The new sub civilization was devoid of the back uping attitude among the unit directors and caused issues of motive in the FPA ‘s.Here it is relevant to inquire whether public presentation is related to motive. In this instance a definite nexus was seen between public presentation and motive. Actually this can be farther simplified depending on the wages given for public presentation. It was seen that when the wages is good FPA motive is good and frailty versa. Thorndike ( 1911 ) suggests that the repeat of public presentation is linked to the wages given for public presentation. If the wages is good the employees are motivated farther and are likely to reiterate the behavior. I excessively agree to this position in this instance of FPA. The wages for FPA was in many ways like wage, quarterly and monthly strategies and gifts, being sent abroad as company embassadors etc. It ‘s seen that the FPA ‘s who are more successful in accomplishing these wagess, invariably seek to reiterate the public presentation and better ain degrees. But Durst ( 1987 ) challenged the nexus between public presentation and motive. This was further supported by Richardson & A ; Nejad ( 1986 ) proposing no nexus between public presentation and motive. Milne, P ( 2007 ) countered this by reasoning that wagess are positively linked to public presentation and involvement in an organisation.The positions against are non fitted in the current instance of FPAs and I can non hold to the position points of Durst ( 1987 ) and Richardson & A ; Nijad ( 1986 ) .

So what was the normal reaction of the executing FPAs to all these major factors act uponing their motive in this new sub civilization? The FPA began to compare their state of affairss in Gladiator to other competitory organisations. This was reasonably easy as many of their old unit directors who recruited them where in-between directors in other companies.The FPA started to do comparing with the attempt they put in and the assorted wagess and acknowledgments they now get and in other companies. Most of the times they were satisfied with the wage they were acquiring, but were non satisfied with the acknowledgment they are acquiring. Lachance ( 2000, p. 3 ) suggested the importance of acknowledgment in retaining the employees. Lack of acknowledgment led to FPA de motive in Gladiator and they started switching to other rivals for the same portion clip work where they expected to acquire the better acknowledgment and motive from their old unit directors. This was supported by Adams ( 1963 ) equity theory. He suggests that people will do comparings on their places with similar individuals in similar state of affairss. The consequence will be that they will confront unfairness or equity. In this instance, an unfairness was found and the FPA started to seek alternate employments in the same sector.My position point in this instance hold to this Adam ‘s position point as I have seen batch of extremely paid and possible FPA ‘s switching to rivals due to the de-motivation they faced in Gladiator ‘s new sub civilization. This besides establishes the position point that, how a bad alteration in organizational civilization, led to fring of competitory advantage of the Organization and the same happened in instance of Gladiators.

Let ‘s hold another expression into the vanishing of the monthly unit meeting in the new subculture. What was the direct and indirect impact due to that? These meetings are the topographic points where a director can understand much about each FPA in individual and understand their single aspiration in their life. The director can therefore associate the FPA undertaking in Gladiator to the aspiration of that person in his life thereby achieving a motivation for undertaking. But due to the vanishing of this activity in new sub civilization FPA was confronting an disaffection.Their undertaking was non related to any of their aspirations by the director. So even if a acting FPA acquire ego motivated and achieve the aspiration, it was non likely that they will acquire motivated once more for the same undertaking under the same sub cultural director. This is because the director dint had any focal point on the concluding result of the undertaking. Vroom, V ( 1963 ) agrees to this by stating that the accomplishment of concluding result after wage is really of import for the Instrumentality by which the person get motivated once more for the undertaking. The directors in the new sub civilization were non associating the wage to FPA ‘s aspirations and their coveted concluding result nor were they actuating them harmonizing to FPA ‘s aspirations.

But the fact of being and development of new sub civilizations can non be denied. In fact they are present and evolved in about all organisations. Schein ( 1985 ) dainty organisational civilization as a individual big unit. The paper analyses how a incorrect sub civilization development impacted the public presentation of an administration in an country. The impacts were terrible which led to the diminution of motive and public presentation of its ain employees. Furthermore it led to fring of the competitory advantage of the house. Gregory ( 1983 ) , Rubenson & A ; Gupta ( 1992 ) , Wanous ( 1980 ) and Couke & A ; Rousseau ( 1988 ) supported the impact of the sub civilization formation on the administration and it s employees. Their surveies were supported and based the issues that happened in the Gladiator. Mcclelland ( 1961 ) ( Schneider & A ; Locke, 1972 ) , ( Cameron and Pierce, 1977 ) and Milne, P ( 2007 ) supported further on the impact of motive, public presentation and acknowledgment of the employees. The analysis helped me in understanding the issues happened in my ain work environment and how an unseeable organisational cultural alteration will hold an impact on the employees of the administration. It further portrayed the importance of proper civilization in administrations and why it is of import for the success of an administration. When I return to work environment in future I will take necessary stairss for placing the proper manner of making work in an that peculiar administration which will in bend help the motive, morale and public presentation of at least my ain employees. From this paper civilization can be identified as a cardinal factor for the success of any organisation.


Adams, J.S. ( 1963 ) ‘Towards an apprehension of unfairness ‘ , Journal of Abnormal and societal Psychology, 67,422-36

Durst, M ( 1987 ) ‘The “ Three Rs ” of Motivation: Duty, Recognition, Reward ‘ , systems/3X universe, 15 ( 7 ) , 120-21.

Gregory, K.L ( 1983 ) , ‘Multiple civilizations & A ; civilization struggle in Organizations ‘ , Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 28,359-376

Herzberg, F, B, Mausner and Snyderman ( 1959 ) , The motive to work, Wiley, New York

Lawler, E.E. and J.L Suttle ( 1972 ) ‘A causal co relational trial of the demand of hierarchy Concept ‘ , Organisational Behaviour and human public presentation, April, 265-87.

Marilyn M Helms & A ; Rick Stern ( 2001 ) , ‘ researching the factors that influence employees perceptual experience of their organizational civilization, ‘ diary of direction in medical specialty, vol 15 no 6, 2001, pp 415-429

Maslow, A.H ( 1970 ) Motivation and Personality, 2nd edition, Harper & A ; Row, New York

McClelland, D.C ( 1961 ) the accomplishing Society, Free Press, New York

Patricia Milne ( 2007 ) , ‘ Motivation, inducements and organizational

Culture ‘ , Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 11 No. 6 2007, pp. 28-38,

Pascale, R.T. , 1985 ‘The paradox Of Organization Culture: accommodating ourselves to socialisation ‘ , California Management Review, Vol 27, no.2, pp.26-41

Rauschenberger, J. N, Schmitt and J. Hunter ( 1980 ) ‘A Test of demand of hierarchy construct by a Markov theoretical account of alteration in demand strength ‘ , Administrative Science Quarterly, 25 ( 4 ) 654-70

Richardson & A ; A, Nejad ( 1986 ) ‘Employee Share ownership in UK and rating ‘ , British Journal of Industrial Relations, 24 ( 2 ) , 233-50

Schein, E.H. , ( 1985 ) , Organizational civilization and leading, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

Schneider, J & A ; E. A.Locke ( 1972 ) ‘A review of Herzberg ‘s Incident Classification System ‘ , Organizational behavior and human Performance, 6, 441-57

Thorndike, E.L ( 1911 ) Animal Intelligence, Macmillan, New York

Vroom, V.H ( 1964 ) Work and Motivation, Wiley, New York

London Metropolitan University, MBA


I'm Niki!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out