The chief subject of “The Star” by Arthur C. Clarke trades with religion. Clarke defines faith as holding belief and trust in God with strong strong belief. Clarke believes that one must hold religion non merely during blissful times. such as during the clip of creative activity. but besides during clip of anguish. such as when devastation occurs. God “created” when a star flew over Bethlehem. merely as God destroyed a star. the Phoenix Nebula. and its environing planets including any life that may hold lived at that place. God does non hold to warrant His actions to adult male. God can make as he pleases. his actions do non hold to follow a logical sequence. Just because negative events are happening does non intend that God does non be. A minor subject in the narrative trades with believing two thoughts. faith and scientific discipline. that wholly contradict each other. “The Star” combines these drastically different thoughts into one narrative.
The supporter is a Renaissance adult male. He is both a scientist and a spiritual adult male ; more specifically a main astrophysicist of a starship and a Jesuit. He is holding problem make up one’s minding if he should maintain his religion. He is besides a really intelligent adult male that published many scientific articles in the Astrophysical Journal and in the Royal Astronomical Society Notices. He besides seems to resemble the Greek philosopher Socrates ; he inquiries everything and he does non accept new thoughts easy. His chief end is to research a star that exploded. the Phoenix Nebula. As the narrative progresses the supporter regains his religion. From the beginning of the narrative when he inquiries if the rood still stands for something to the terminal of the narrative when he accepts that God does what He does for a ground.
The adversaries in the narrative are nature and the ship crew. The chief end of the adversaries is to do the supporter give up his religion in God. The ship crew is level for the most portion and their chief occupation is to run the ship and to convert the supporter that God does non be. The ship crew is filled with physicians and scientists and most of them are atheists. Nature causes an array of catastrophes to happen such as the detonation of the Phoenix Nebula and this makes the protagonist inquiry his religion. The adversaries do non alter through out the narrative.
The narrative takes topographic point around the twelvemonth 2500 in a starship that is going through infinite. Space is some what symbolic for scientific discipline. and scientific discipline normally contradicts faith. therefore the scene is another adversary seeking to do the supporter lose his religion. The chief struggles of the narrative are of the type adult male verses self. adult male verses group. and adult male poetries nature. The supporter is no longer certainly if he should maintain his religion in God. The first event that causes the supporter to oppugn his religion is when he witnesses the detonation of a star. the Phoenix Nebula. The supporter is holding problem make up one’s minding how God. something that he believes in so strongly. could make something every bit rough as destroy a star and therefore all its environing planets with any life that might hold lived at that place. The starship so reaches the Phoenix Nebula galaxy and the crew notices that one of the planets. which resembles Pluto in our galaxy. is still left because it was further off from the star. When the starship lands on this cryptic planet they find a vault with all the properties of a civilisation that one time inhabited this planet.
The supporter can non understand why God would destruct their galaxy. he says. “they were non evil…to be destroyed so wholly in the full flower of accomplishment. go forthing no subsisters – how could that be reconciled with the clemency of God? ” At this point the supporter decides that he had excessively much. and merely as he is about to give up his religion there is a turning point. which is besides the high point of the narrative. The supporter comes to a realisation that God does non hold to warrant His actions to adult male and that God destroys merely as he creates. The rapprochement is that the supporter accepts this new position of God and he one time once more regains his religion. The supporter will likely make up one’s mind that seeing the devastation of civilisations is excessively much for him to bare and he will eventually retire from being an astrophysicist and alternatively he will devout his full clip to faith.
Most of the symbols in the narrative trade with faith and religion in God. The rood hanging in the protagonist’s cabin room resembles God and all the religion that the supporter has in Him. The supporter looks at the rood and he wonders if it truly means anything any more. This event is when the supporter first inquiries his religion. Two more symbols in the narrative that represent religion are the Ruben engravings of Loyola. which is a good known paining of Loyola by a celebrated creative person by the name of Paul Ruben. The other symbol is Exercitia Spiritualia. which is a book written by Loyola that Jesuits usage for counsel. The supporter uses both of these symbols to make up one’s mind if his religion is deserving maintaining. In the terminal of the narrative a symbol of a star that passes of Bethlehem is mentioned ; this refers to the star of Bethlehem. which has long been a symbol of Christianity or of God “creating. ” This is what causes the supporter to recover his religion since God is “creating” as opposed to destructing here.
Through out the whole narrative the supporter inquiries his religion. He has a difficult clip understanding how God. something he believes in with all his passion. could make something so pitiless as destroy a whole galaxy and with it a whole civilisation. The supporter so comes to a realisation that God does both good and evil. and hence religion should be kept in God whether or non good things are go oning. “The Star” is a quality narrative for the most portion that has withstood the trial of clip. The narrative has a sense of suspense ; it truly makes you inquire what will go on next. For illustration. as you read the narrative you wonder what will the crew happen on the cryptic planet. The narrative has good balance as it excellently ties in two different political orientations: faith and scientific discipline.
The narrative leaps from the protagonist’s inner believing to action and back to the interior thought. The narrative nonly entertains. but besides teaches us lessons in uranology and in faith. The reader is able to larn about the solar system and how God works. The narrative is reliable for the most portion because it makes you feel like you are truly in the starship five hundred old ages into the hereafter. However. the narrative mentions the Mark VI computing machine ; this is a computing machine that was used in the fiftiess. The mentioning of this computing machine causes the reader to experience that they are winging at light velocity in the twelvemonth 2500. while utilizing a 1950s computing machine.